Proteus: A lecturer-friendly adaptive tutoring system

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 533-554

  Sessink, Olivier D T ^a   Beeftink, Hendrik H ^a   Tramper, Johannes ^a   Hartog, Rob J M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749094936     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, J.R. (1995). Learning and memory. An integrated approach., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Armani, J. (2005). VIDET. A visual authoring tool for adaptive websites tailored to non-programmer teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 36-52.
3. Aroyo, L., & Mizoguchi, R. (2004). Towards evolutional authoring support systems. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 15(4), 365-387.
4. Beaumont I., Brusilavsky, P. (1995). Adaptive hypermedia: From ideas to real systems. In H. Maurer (Ed.), Educational multimedia and hypermedia 1995(pp. 93-98). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
5. Bra, P. De, Aerts, A., Smits, D., & Stash, N. (2002). AHA! Version 2.0, more adaptation flexibility for authors. In M. Driscoll & T. C. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning 2002 (pp. 240-246), Montreal, Canada. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
6. Bra, P. De, & Ruiter, J.P. (2001) AHA! Adaptive hypermedia for all. Proceedings of the AACE WebNet Conference (pp. 262-268), Orlando, FL. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
7. Brusilovsky, P. (1994). The construction and application of student models in intelligent tutoring systems. Computer and System Sciences International, 32(1), 70-89.
8. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J., & Schwarz, E. (1997). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia on the world wide web. Proceedings of INTERACT97, The 6th IFIP World Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 278-285), Sydney, Australia. New York: Chapman & Hall.
9. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J., & Schwarz, E.W. (1998). Web-based education for all: A tool for development adaptive courseware. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1-7), 291-300.
10. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(11), 87-110.
11. Calvi, L., & De Bra, P. (1997) Using dynamic hypertext to create mufti-purpose textbooks, In T. Müldner & T. C. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA - Word Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 130-135), Calgary, Canada. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
12. Cheniti-Belcadhi, L., Braham, R., Henze, N., & Nejdl, W. (2004, October). A generic framework for assessment in adaptive educational hypermedia, Paper presented at the IADIS WWW / Internet 2004 Conference, Madrid, Spain.
13. Conati, C., Gertner, A., & Van Lehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Modeling and User-Adaptive, Interaction, 12(4), 371-417.
14. Dagger, D., Wade, V., & Conlan, O. (2005). Personalisation for all: Making adaptive course composition easy. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 9-25.
15. Esposito, F., Licchelli, O., & Semeraro, G. (2004). Discovering student models in e-learning systems. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(1) 47-57.
16. Henze, N., & Nejdl, W. (1999, September). Bayesian modeling for adaptive hypermedia systems. Paper presented at the GI-Workshop Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung in interaktiven Softwaresystemen, Magdeburg, Germany.
17. IMS (2004). Question and Test Interoperabilo (QTI) specification. Retrieved June 13, 2007, from http://www.imsglobal.org/question/
18. Kay, J., & Kummerfeld, R.J. (1994, October). An individualised course for the C programming language. Paper presented at the Second International WWW Conference, Chicago, IL.
19. Kester, L., Kirschner, P.A., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., & Baumer, A. (2001). Just-in-time information presentation and the acquistion of comples cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behaviour, 17, 373-391.
20. Kulhavy, R., & Stock, W. (1989). Feedback in written Instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308.
21. Merriënboer, J. J. G. van (1997). Training complex cognidve skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22. Mizoguchi, R., & Bourdeau, J. (2000). Using ontological engineering to overcome common AI-ED problems. Intemadonal Journal on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 1-12.
23. Murray, T. (1999). Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: An analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 98-129.
24. Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2002). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. In H. M. Niegemann, R. Brünken, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195), Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
25. Pivec, M., & Baumann, K. (2004). The role of adaptation and personalisation in classroom-based learning and in e-learning. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 10(1) 73-89.
26. Sessink, O.D.T., Beeftink, H.H., & Hartog, R.J.M. (2005). Database functionality for learning objects. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 2, 337-357.
27. Vassileva, J. (1997, August). Dynamic course generation on the WWW. In B. d. Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Proceedings of AI-ED'97, 8th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 498-505), Kobe, Japan. Amsterdam: IOS.