Trunk density profile estimates from dual X-ray absorptiometry

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 861-867

  Wicke, Jason ^a   Dumas, Geneviève A ^b   Costigan, Patrick A ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE   (United States)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Body segment parameters; Density; DXA; Geometric modeling

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DISCRETE FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

BODY SEGMENT PARAMETERS; DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DXA); GEOMETRIC MODELING; TRUNK DENSITY FUNCTION;

JOINT PROSTHESES;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY DENSITY; BODY FAT; BODY MASS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; TRUNK;

ABDOMEN; ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY COMPOSITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; THORAX;

EID: 39649097613     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ackland T.R., Henson P., and Bailey D. The uniform density assumption: Its effect upon the estimation of body segment inertial parameters. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 4 (1988) 146-155
2. Andrews J.J., and Mish S.P. Methods for investigating the sensitivity of joint resultants to body segment parameter variations. Journal of Biomechanics 29 (1996) 651-654
3. Desjardins P., Plamondon A., and Gagnon M. Sensitivity analysis of segment models to estimate the net reaction moments at the L5/S1 joint in lifting. Medical Engineering & Physics 20 (1998) 153-158
4. Durkin, J.L., 1998. The prediction of body segment parameters using geometric modeling and dual photon absorptiometry. M.Sc. Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton.
5. Durkin J.L., and Dowling J.J. Analysis of body segment parameter differences between four human populations and the estimation errors of four popular mathematical models. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 125 (2003) 515-522
6. Erdmann W.S. Geometric and inertial data of the trunk in adult males. Journal of Biomechanics 30 (1997) 679-688
7. Jensen R.K. Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. Journal of Biomechanics 11 (1978) 349-358
8. Larivière C., and Gagnon D. The influence of trunk modelling in 3D biomechanical analysis of simple and complex lifting tasks. Clinical Biomechanics 14 (1999) 449-461
9. McIlwain, J., 1998. Slicer (Computer Software). Author, Sudbury, Ont.
10. Nigg B.M. Inertial properties of the human or animal body. In: Nigg B.M., and Herzog W. (Eds). Biomechanics of the Musculo-Skeletal System. second ed (1999), Wiley, New York 376-399
11. Pearsall D.J., Reid J.G., and Ross R. Inertial properties of the human trunk of males determined from magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 22 (1994) 692-706
12. Pearsall D.J., Reid J.G., and Livingston L.A. Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 24 (1996) 198-210
13. Wei C., and Jensen R.K. The application of segment axial density profiles to a human body inertia model. Journal of Biomechanics 28 (1995) 103-108
14. Wicke, 2006. The development and assessment of a new geometric modelling technique. Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont., Canada.
15. Winter D.A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. second ed (1990), Wiley, New York pp. 51-64