The influence of trunk modelling in 3D biomechanical analysis of simple and complex lifting tasks

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 449-461

  Larivière, Christian ^a   Gagnon, Denis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Body segment parameters; Errors; L5 S1 joint; Lifting; Linked segment model; Tridimensional analysis; Trunk modelling; Trunk partitioning

Indexed keywords

JOINTS (ANATOMY); MATERIALS HANDLING; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; SUBJECTIVE TESTING;

BODY SEGMENTS; INVERSE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; TRUNK PARTITIONING;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; DYNAMOMETRY; FORCE TRANSDUCER; HIP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHOULDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRUNK;

ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; BACK; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; LIFTING; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0344849491     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00009-1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE, Rajulu SL, Allread WG, Fathallah FA, Fergusson SA. The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. Spine 1993;18:617-28.
2. Gagnon D, Gagnon M. The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. J Biomech 1992;25:891-901.
3. Gagnon M, Plamondon A, Gravel D. Pivoting with the load an alternative for protecting the back in asymmetrical lifting. Spine 1993;18:1515-524.
4. Kingma I, de Looze MP, Toussaint HM, Klijnsma HG, Bruijnen TBM. Validation of a full body 3-D dynamic linked segment model. Human Movement Science 1996;15:833-60.
5. de Looze MP, Kingma I, Thunnissen W, Van Wijk MJ, Toussaint HM. The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities. Ergonomics 1994;37:1495-502.
6. Straker LM, Stevenson MG, Twomey LT, Smith LM. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 3. Biomechanical measures. Ergonomics 1997;40:708-28.
7. Kingma I, Toussaint HM, de Looze MP, Van Dieen JH. Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model. J Biomech 1996;29:693-704.
8. Erdmann WS. Geometric and inertial data of the trunk in adult males. J Biomech 1997;30:679-88.
9. Chandler RF, Clauser CE., McConville JT, Reynolds HM, Young JW. Investigation of the inertial properties of the human body. Technical Report, DOT HS-801-430, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1975.
10. Clauser CE, McConville JT, Young JW. Weight, volume, and centre of mass of segments of the human body. AMRL Technical Report, TR-69-70, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1969.
11. Dempster WT. Space requirements of the seated operator. Geometrical, kinetic, and mechanical aspects of the body with special reference to the limbs. WADC Technical Report, 55-159, 1955.
12. McConville JT, Churchill TD, Kaleps I, Clauser CE, Cuzzi J. Anthropometric relationships of body and body segment moments of inertia. Technical Report, AFAMRL-TR-80-119, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1980.
13. Plagenhoef S. Anatomical data for analyzing human motion. Research Quarterly 1983;54:169-78.
14. Zatsiorsky VM, Seluyanov VN, Chugunova LG. Methods of determining mass-inertial characteristics of human body segments. In: Chernyi GC, Rediger SA, editors. Advances in science and technology in the USSR, contemporary problems in biomechanics. Boca Raton, MA:CRC Press, 1990.
15. Pearsall DJ, Reid JG, Ross R. Inertial properties of the human trunk of males determined from magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1994;22:692-706.
16. Liu YK, Wickstrom JK. Estimation of the inertial property distribution of the human torso from segmented cadaveric data. Perspective in Biomedical Engineering 1973:203-13.
17. Hanavan EP. A mathematical model of the human body. AMRL Technical Report, TR-64-102. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 1964.
18. Hatze H. A mathematical model for the computational determination of parameter values of anthropomorphic segments. J Biomech 1980;13:833-43.
19. Jensen RK. Estimation of the biomechanical properties of three body types using a photogrammetric method. J Biomech 1978;11:349-58.
20. Yeadon MR. The simulation of aerial movement- II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body. J Biomech 1990;23:67-74.
21. Hinrichs RN. Adjustments to the segment center of mass proportions of Clauser et al. (1969). J Biomech 1990;23:949-51.
22. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1990.
23. Parks JL. Jr. An electromyographic and mechanical analysis of selected abdominal exercises. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1959.
24. de Looze MP, Kingma I, Bussmann JBJ, Toussaint HM. Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. Clin Biomech 1992;7:161-69.
25. Plamondon A, Gagnon M, Desjardins P. Validation of two 3-D segments models to calculate the net reaction forces and moments at the L5/S1 joint in lifting. Clin Biomech 1996;11:101-10.
26. de Leva P. Validity and accuracy of four methods for locating the center of mass of young male and female athletes. In Proceedings of International Society of Biomechanics XIVth Congress, ISB'93, Imprimerie Laballery, Paris, France 1993:318-19.
27. de Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 1996;29:1223-230.
28. Larivière C, Gagnon D. Comparison between two dynamic methods to estimate triaxial net reaction moments at the L5/S1 joint during lifting. Clin Biomech 1998;13:36-47.
29. Larivière C, Gagnon D. The L5/S1 joint moment sensitivity to measurement errors in dynamic 3D multisegment lifting models. Accepted for publication in Human Movement Science, 1999.
30. Cappozzo A, Catani F, Della Croce U, Leardini A. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 1995;10:171-78.
31. Liu YK, Laborde JM, Van Buskirk WC. Inertial properties of a segmented cadaver trunk: their implications in acceleration injuries. Aerospace Medicine 1971:650-57.
32. Plagenhoef S. Patterns of human motion. A cinematographic analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
33. Hof AL. An explicit expression for the moment in multibody systems. J Biomech 1992;25:1209-211.
34. O'Connor PD, Robinson ME, Shirley FR, MacMillan M. The effect of marker placement deviations on spinal range of motion determined by video motion analysis. Phys Ther 1993:478-83.
35. Cole GK, Nigg BM, Ronsky JL, Yeadon MR. Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: A standardization proposal. J Biomech Eng 1993;115:344-49.
36. Jager M, Luttmann A. Biomechanical analysis and assessment of lumbar stress during load lifting using a dynamic 19-segment human model. Ergonomics 1989;32:93-112.