The paradox of technological capabilities: A study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R and D operations

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 291-303

  Song, Jaeyong ^a,c   Shin, Jongtae ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Absorptive capacity; Knowledge sourcing; Overseas R D; Relative capabilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 39649096103     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400348     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ahuja, G. 2000. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 317-343.
2. Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. 1991. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3): 251-259.
3. Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter special issue): 155-165.
4. Almeida, P., & Phene, A. 2004. Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9): 847-864.
5. Almeida, P., Song, J. Y., & Grant, R. M. 2002. Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organization Science, 13(2): 147-161.
6. Asakawa, K. 2001. Organizational tension in international R&D management: The case of Japanese firms. Research Policy, 30(5): 735-757.
7. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Cantwell, J. A. 1989. Technological innovation and multinational corporations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
9. Cantwell, J. A., & Janne, O. 1999. Technological globalization and innovative centres: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Research Policy, 28(2): 19-144.
10. Caves, R. E. 1971. International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38(149): 1-27.
11. Chung, W., & Alcacer, J. 2002. Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science, 48(12): 1534-1554.
12. Chung, W., & Song, J. Y. 2004. Sequential investment, firm motives, and agglomeration of Japanese electronics firms in the United States. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 13(3): 539-560.
13. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
14. Darr, E. D., & Kurtzberg, T. R. 2000. An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1): 28-44.
15. Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3): 147-162.
16. Dunning, J. H. 1993. Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
17. Florida, R. 1997. The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26(1): 85-103.
18. Flyer, F., & Shaver, M. 2003. Location choices under agglomeration externalities and strategic interaction. In J. A. C. Baum & O. Sorensen (Eds), Geography and strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 20, 193-213. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19. Frost, T. S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2): 101-123.
20. Furman, J., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. 2002. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31 (6): 899-933.
21. Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1): 101-128.
22. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2000. Market value and patent citations: A first look. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
23. Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1 ): 82-111.
24. Hedlund, G. 1986. The hypermodern MNC - A heterarchy? Human Resource Management, 25(1): 9-35.
25. Hymer, S. H. 1960. The international operation of national firms: A study of direct investment. PhD Dissertation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
26. Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. 2002. Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. 1991. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 577-599.
28. Kortum, S., & Lerner, J. 1999. What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Research Policy, 28(1): 1-22.
29. Kuemmerle, W. 1999. The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1 ): 1-24.
30. Lane, J. P., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461-477.
31. Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32. March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science, 2(1): 71-87.
33. Mitchell, W., Baum, J. A. C., Banaszak-Holl, J., Berta, W. B., & Bowman, D. 2000. Opportunity and constraint: Chain-to-component transfer learning in multiunit chains of US nursing homes, 1991-1997. In N. Bontis & C. W. Choo (Eds), Strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge: 555-574. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Mowery, D., Oxley, J., & Silverman, B. 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5): 507-523.
35. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. 1987. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16(2-4): 143-155.
36. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
37. Penner-Hahn, J., & Shaver, J.M. 2005. Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 121-140.
38. Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. 1995. A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5): 1224-1260.
39. Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6): 751-766.
40. Shan, W., & Song, J. Y. 1997. Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 267-284.
41. Singh, J. 2004. Multinational firms and knowledge diffusion: Evidence using patent citation data. INSEAD working paper 2004-75.
42. Singh, J. 2005. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5): 756-770.
43. Song, J. Y., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. 2003. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate inter-firm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4): 351-365.
44. Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Summer special issue): 21-38.
45. Zahra, S., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 185-203.
46. Ziedonis, R. H. 2004. Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science, 50(6): 804-820.