Topology matters: Network topology affects outcomes from community ecology neutral models (DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.11.002);Topology matters: Network topology affects outcomes from community ecology neutral models

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 165-171

  White, Denis ^a   Kiester, A Ross ^b  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b Biodiversity Futures Consulting   (United States)

Author keywords

Community ecology; Neutral model; Population biology; Simulation model; Topology

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TOPOLOGY;

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; NETWORK TOPOLOGY; NEUTRAL MODEL; POPULATION BIOLOGY; SIMULATION MODEL;

ECOLOGY;

ABUNDANCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; LIFE HISTORY THEORY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; TOPOLOGY;

EID: 39549116093     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.06.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Adler P.B. Neutral models fail to reproduce observed species-area and species-time relationships in Kansas grasslands. Ecology 85 5 (2004) 1265-1272
2. Bell G. The distribution and abundance in neutral communities. The American Naturalist 155 5 (2000) 606-617
3. Bell G. Neutral macroecology. Science 293 28 (2001) 2413-2418
4. Bell G. The interpretation of biological surveys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 270 (2003) 2531-2542
5. Bell G. The co-distribution of species in relation to the neutral theory of community ecology. Ecology 86 7 (2005) 1757-1770
6. Birch C.P.D. Diagonal and orthogonal neighbours in grid-based simulations: Buffon's stick after 200 years. Ecological Modelling 192 (2006) 637-644
7. Bithell M., and Macmillan W.D. Escape from the cell: Spatially explicit modelling with and without grids. Ecological Modelling 200 (2007) 59-78
8. Brown J.H. Toward a general theory of biodiversity. Evolution 55 10 (2001) 2137-2138
9. Chase J.M. Towards a really unified theory for metacommunities. Functional Ecology 19 (2005) 182-186
10. Chave J. Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecology Letters 7 (2004) 241-253
11. Chave J., Muller-Landau H.C., and Levin S.A. Comparing classical community models: Theoretical consequences for patterns of diversity. The American Naturalist 159 1 (2002) 1-23
12. Cioffi-Revilla C. Invariance and universality in social agent-based simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 Suppl. 3 (2002) 7314-7316
13. Condit R., Pitman N., Leigh Jr. E.G., Chave J., Terborgh J., Foster R.B., et al. Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295 25 (2002) 666-669
14. Conway J.H., and Sloane N.J.A. Sphere packings, lattices and groups. 3rd ed. (1999), Springer-Verlag, New York
15. Enquist B.J., Sanderson J., and Weiser M.D. Modeling macroscopic patterns in ecology. Science 295 8 (2002) 1835-1836
16. Etienne R.S., and Olff H. A novel genealogical approach to neutral biodiversity theory. Ecology Letters 7 (2004) 170-175
17. Flache A., and Hegselmann R. Do irregular grids make a difference? Relaxing the spatial regularity assumption in cellular models of social dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4 4 (2001)
18. Frisch U., Hasslacher B., and Pomeau Y. Lattice-gas automata for the Navier-Stokes equations. Physical Review Letters 56 14 (1986) 1505-1508
19. Gilbert B., and Lechowicz M.J. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101 20 (2004) 7651-7656
20. He F. Deriving a neutral model of species abundance from fundamental mechanisms of population dynamics. Functional Ecology 19 (2005) 187-193
21. Hubbell S.P. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography (2001), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
22. Hubbell S.P. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Functional Ecology 19 (2005) 166-172
23. Keller, J. K., Heimbuch, D., & Richmond, M. (1979). Optimization of grid cell shape for analysis of wildlife habitat. Paper presented at the proceedings of the thirteenth international symposium on remote sensing of environment, Ann Arbor.
24. Lande R. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76 1 (1996) 5-13
25. Magurran A.E. Ecological diversity and its measurement (1988), Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
26. Magurran A.E. Species abundance distributions: Pattern or process?. Functional Ecology 19 (2005) 177-181
27. McGill B.J. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 422 24 (2003) 881-885
28. McGill B., and Collins C. A unified theory for macroecology based on spatial patterns of abundance. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5 (2003) 469-492
29. McKane A.J., Alonso D., and Solé R.V. Analytic solution of Hubbell's model of local community dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology 65 (2004) 67-73
30. Murray Jr. B.G. Dispersal in vertebrates. Ecology 48 6 (1967) 975-978
31. Nee S. The neutral theory of biodiversity; do the numbers add up?. Functional Ecology 19 (2005) 173-176
32. Nee S., and Stone G. The end of the beginning for neutral theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18 9 (2003) 433-434
33. Olea R.A. Sampling design optimization for spatial functions. Mathematical Geology 16 4 (1984) 369-392
34. Stauffer D., and Aharony A. Introduction to percolation theory. 2nd ed. (1992), Taylor & Francis, London
35. Toffoli T., and Margolus N. Cellular automata machines (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
36. Vallade M., and Houchmandzadeh B. Analytical solution of a neutral model of biodiversity. Physical Review E 68 061902 (2003) 1-5
37. Volkov I., Banavar J.R., Hubbell S.P., and Maritan A. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424 28 (2003) 1035-1037
38. Wolfram Mathworld (2006). Percolation threshold. Accessed 18.01.06.
39. Yu D.W., Terborgh J.W., and Potts M.D. Can high tree species richness be explained by Hubbell's null model?. Ecology Letters 1 (1998) 193-199