Predicting local colonization and extinction dynamics from coarser-scale surveys

Ecography

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 61-72

  Moody Weis, Jennifer ^a,b   Antonovics, Janis ^c   Alexander, Helen M ^a   Pilson, Diana ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b WILLIAM JEWELL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; COLONIZATION; EXTINCTION; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTION; SURVEY;

HELIANTHUS; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; SILENE; SILENE LATIFOLIA;

EID: 39549105880     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2008.0906-7590.05282.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alexander, H. M. Schrag, A. M. 2003. Role of soil seed banks and newly dispersed seeds in population dynamics of the annual sunflower, Helianthus annuus J. Ecol. 91 : 987 998.
2. Antonovics, J. 2004. Long-term study of a plant-pathogen metapopulation Hanksi, I. Gaggiotti, O. E. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier 471 488.
3. Antonovics, J. et al. 1994. Ecological genetics of metapopulations: the Silene - Ustilago plant-pathogen system Real, L. A. Ecological genetics. Princeton Univ. Press 146 170.
4. Antonovics, J. et al. 1998. Genetics and the spatial ecology of species interactions: the Silene - Ustilago system Tilman, D. Kareiva, P. Spatial ecology. Princeton Univ. Press 156 180.
5. Avnir, D. et al. 1998. Is the geometry of nature fractal Science 279 : 39 40.
6. Bolker, B. M. 2004. Continuous-space models for population dynamics Hanksi, I. Gaggiotti, O. E. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier 45 69.
7. Conlisk, E. et al. 2007. The impossibility of estimating a negative binomial clustering parameter from presence-absence data: a comment on He and Gaston Am. Nat. 170 : 651 654.
8. Cousens, R. et al. 2004. Are the spatial patterns of weeds scale-invariant? Oikos 107 : 251 264.
9. Crawley, M. J. Brown, S. L. 1995. Seed limitation and the dynamics of feral oilseed rape on the M25 motorway Proc. R. Soc. B 259 : 49 54.
10. Englund, G. Hambäck, P. A. 2004. Scale dependence of emigration rates Ecology 85 : 320 327.
11. Englund, G. et al. 2001. Application of a model of scale dependence to quantify scale domains in open predation experiments Oikos 92 : 501 514.
12. Freckleton, R. P. Watkinson, A. R. 2002. Large-scale spatial dynamics of plants: metapopulations, regional ensembles, and patchy populations J. Ecol. 90 : 419 434.
13. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford Univ. Press.
14. Gonzato, G. et al. 1998. Practical application of fractal analysis: problems and solutions Geophys. J. Int. 132 : 275 282.
15. Gonzato, G. et al. 2000. Measuring the fractal dimensions of ideal and actual objects: implications for application in geology and geophysics Geophys. J. Int. 142 : 108 116.
16. Halley, J. M. et al. 2004. Uses and abuses of fractal methodology in ecology Ecol. Lett. 7 : 254 271.
17. Hamburger, D. et al. 1996. Apparent fractality emerging from models of random distributions Phys. Rev. E 53 : 3342 3358.
18. Hanski, I. Gaggiotti, O. E. 2004. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier.
19. Hartley, S. et al. 2004. Coherence and discontinuity in the scaling of species' distribution patterns Proc. R. Soc. B 271 : 81 88.
20. Hayes, J. P. Shonkwiler, J. S. 2006. Allometry, antilog transformations, and the perils of prediction on the original scale Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 79 : 665 674.
21. He, F. Gaston, K. J. 2000. Estimating species abundances from occurrence Am. Nat. 56 : 553 559.
22. He, F. Gaston, K. J. 2007. Estimating abundance from occurrence: an undetermined problem Am. Nat. 170 : 655 659.
23. Inouye, B. D. 2005. Scaling up from local competition to regional co-existence across two scales of spatial heterogeneity: insect larvae in the fruits of Apeiba membranacea Oecologia 145 : 188 196.
24. Kallimanis, A. S. et al. 2002. Accuracy of fractal dimension estimates for small samples of ecological distributions Landscape Ecol. 17 : 281 297.
25. Kunin, W. E. 1998. Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales Science 281 : 1513 1515.
26. Kunin, W. E. et al. 2000. Scaling down: on the challenge of estimating abundance from occurrence patterns Am. Nat. 156 : 560 566.
27. Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology Ecology 73 : 1943 1967.
28. May, R. M. 1989. Levels of organization in ecology Cherrett, J. M. Ecological concepts: the contribution of ecology to understanding the natural world. Blackwell 339 361.
29. Menéndez, R. Thomas, C. D. 2000. Metapopulation structure depends on spatial scale in the host-specific moth Wheeleria spilodactylus (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) J. Anim. Ecol. 69 : 935 951.
30. Moody-Weis, J. Alexander, H. M. 2007. Mechanisms and consequences of seed bank formation in wild sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) J. Ecol. 95 : 851 864.
31. Pocock, M. J. O. et al. 2006. Ecological correlates of range structure in rare and scarce British plants J. Ecol. 94 : 581 596.
32. Prince, S. D. et al. 1985. The geographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) II. Characteristics of populations near its distributional limit in Britain J. Ecol. 73 : 39 48.
33. Purrington, C. B. Schmitt, J. 1995. Sexual dimorphism of dormancy and survivorship in buried seeds of Silene latifolia J. Ecol. 83 : 795 800.
34. Rastetter, E. B. et al. 1992. Aggregating fine-scale ecological knowledge to model coarser-scale attributes of ecosystems Ecol. Appl. 2 : 55 70.
35. Reinhardt, K. et al. 2005. Low dispersal ability and habitat specificity promote extinctions in rare, but not in widespread species: the Orthoptera of Germany Ecography 28 : 593 602.
36. Schulze, R. 2000. Transcending scales of space and time in impact studies of climate and climate change on agrohydrological responses Agricult. Ecosyst. Environ. 82 : 185 212.
37. Silvertown, J. Antonovics, J. 2001. Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context. Blackwell.
38. Steele, M. A. Forrester, G. E. 2005. Small-scale field experiments accurately scale up to predict density dependence in reef fish populations at large scales Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 13513 13516.
39. Sugihara, G. May, R. M. 1990. Applications of fractals in ecology Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 : 79 86.
40. Teo-Sherrell, C. P. A. et al. 1996. Fates of weed seeds in soil: a seeded core method of study J. Appl. Ecol. 33 : 1107 1113.
41. Thrall, P. H. Antonovics, J. 1995. Theoretical and empirical studies of metapopulations: population and genetic dynamics of the Silene - Ustilago system Can. J. Bot. (Suppl.) 73 : 1249 1258.
42. Tosh, C. A. et al. 2004. Estimating the abundances of large herbivores in the Kruger National Park using presence-absence data Anim. Conserv. 7 : 55 61.
43. Urban, D. L. 2005. Modeling ecological processes across scales Ecology 86 : 1996 2006.
44. Wiens, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology Funct. Ecol. 3 : 385 397.
45. Wimberly, M. C. 2006. Species dynamics in disturbed landscapes: when does a shifting habitat mosaic enhance connectivity Landscape Ecol. 21 : 35 46.
46. Withers, M. A. Meentemeyer, V. 1999. Concepts of scale in landscape ecology Klopatck, J. M. Gardner, R. H. Landscape ecological analysis. Springer 205 251.
47. Witte, J.-P. M. Torfs, P. J. J. F. 2003. Scale dependency and fractal dimension of rarity Ecography 26 : 60 68.