In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera® crowns

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 025-032

  Rahmé, Habib V ^a,b   Tehini, Georges E ^a,c   Adib, Salim M ^b   Ardo, Albert S ^b   Rifai, Khaldoun T ^c  

^a Department of Fixed Prosthodontics ^*

^b SAINT JOSEPH UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

^c LEBANESE UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

Additional silicone; All Ceram crown; Dental cement; Gap space; Glass ionomer; Marginal fit; Procera crown; Replica technique; RT

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; GLASS IONOMER; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; INCISOR; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; INCISOR; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); POLYVINYLS; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SILOXANES;

EID: 39449139427     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinical perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10:563-78.
2. Felton DA, Kenoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:357-64.
3. Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil. 1986 Sep;13(5):423-32.
4. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting Cement Solubility as function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:436-42.
5. Goldman M, Laosonthorn P, White RR. Microleakage-full crowns and the dental pulp. J Endod. 1992 Oct;18(10):473-5.
6. Zitzmann NU, Galindo ML, Hagmann E, Marinello CP. Clinical evaluation of Procera® AllCeram crowns in the anterior and posterior regions. Int J Prosthodont 2007 May-Jun;20(3):239-41.
7. Walter MH, Wolf BH, Wolf AE, Boening KW. Six-year clinical performance of all-ceramic crowns with alumina cores. Int J Prosthodont 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):162-3.
8. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F, Russo S, De Simone G. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 86 Procera AllCeram anterior single crowns on natural and implant-supported abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S95-103.
9. Wood KC, Berzins DW, Luo Q, Thompson GA, Toth JM, Nagy WW. Resistance to fracture of two all-ceramic crown materials following endodontic access. J Prosthet Dent 2006 Jan;95(1):33-41.
10. May KB, Russel MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Precision of fit: The Procera® All Ceram crown J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:394-404.
11. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32:441-7.
12. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera® Crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10:478-84.
13. Quintas AF, Oliveira F, Bottino MA. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92:250-7.
14. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH. Clinical fit of Procera® All Ceram Crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:419-24.
15. Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera® All Ceram crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 2005; 32:526-30.
16. Coli P, Karlsson S. Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17:59-64.
17. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent. 2001; 26:367-74.
18. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:587-92.
19. Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:244-8.
20. Karlsson S. The fit of Procera® titanium crowns. An in vitro and clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:129-34.
21. Grey NJ, Piddock V, Wilson MA. In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. J Dent 1993; 21:185.
22. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113:174-9.
23. Oden A, Andersson M, Krystek-Ondracek I, Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera® All Ceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:450-6.
24. Hobkirk JA. Grinding technique, surface texture and strength of vitreous carbon and high purity alumina. J Dent 1977; 5:219-26.
25. Xu HHK, Jahnmir S. Simple technique for observing subsurface damage in machining of ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1994; 77:1388-90.
26. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay system. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 201-16.
27. Jemt T, Rubenstein JE, Carlsson L, Lang BR. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:314-25.
28. Abbate MF, Tjan AHL, Fox WM. Comparison of the marginal fit of various ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:527-31.
29. Brukl C, Philip G. The fit of molded all-ceramic, twin fail, and conventional ceramic crowns. J. Prosthet Dent 1987; 58:408-13.
30. Vahidi F, Egloff E, Panno F. Evaluation of marginal adaptation of all ceramic crowns and metal ceranic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:426-31.
31. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Suilk WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:405-8.
32. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Dec;66(6):747-53.
33. White SN, Kipnis V. Effect of adhesive luting agents on the marginal seating of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:28-31.