Little frog and toad: Interaction of orthography and phonology in Polish spelling

Reading and Writing

Volumn 16, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 61-80

  Kaminska, Zofia ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Lexicon; Orthography; Phonology; Priming; Spelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 3943048617     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021746122724     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Allerup, P. & Elbro, C. (1998). Comparing differences in accuracy across conditions or individuals: An argument for the use of log odds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 409-424.
2. Barry, C. & De Bastiani, P. (1997). Lexical priming of nonword spelling in the regular orthography of Italian. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 499-517.
3. Barry, C. & Seymour, P.H.K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 5-40.
4. Barry, C. (1994). Spelling routes (or roots or rutes). In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 27-49). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Baxter, D. & Warrington, E.K. (1985). Category specific phonological dysgraphia. Neuropsychologia, 23, 653-666.
6. Beauvois, M.F. & Dérouesné, J. (1981). Lexical or orthographic agraphia. Brain, 104, 21-49.
7. Brown, A.S. & Loosemore, R.P.W. (1994). Computational approaches to normal and impaired spelling. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling. Theory, process and intervention (pp. 319-335). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Burden, V. (1989). A comparison of priming effects on the nonword spelling performance of good and poor spellers. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 43-65.
9. Campbell, R. (1983). Writing nonwords to dictation. Brain and Language, 19, 153-178.
10. Chua, F.K. (1999). Phonological recoding in Chinese logograph recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 876-891.
11. Coltheart, M. & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
12. Cuetos, F. (1993). Writing processes in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 17-28.
13. DeFrancis, J. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
14. Dixon, M. & Kaminska, Z. (1994). Casting a spell with witches and broomsticks: Direct and associative influences on nonword orthography. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 383-398.
15. Ellis, A.W. (1993). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis (pp. 59-73). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
16. Grover-Stripp, M. & Bellin, W. (1983). A comparative study of syntagmatic associations among Polish and English adults. Linguistics, 21, 419-433.
17. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic alphabet (1999). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: UK.
18. Hatfield, F.M. & Patterson, K.E. (1983). Phonological spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 459-489.
19. Kurcz, I. (1967). Polskie normy powszechności skojarzeń swobodnych. [Polish free-association norms.] Studia Psychologiczne, 7, 130-255.
20. Lukatela, G. & Turvey, M.T. (1994). Visual access is initially phonological: Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
21. McNamara, T.P. (1992). Theories of priming: 1. Associative distance and time lag. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 1173-1190.
22. Morton, J. (1980). The logogen model and orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 117-134). London: Academic Press.
23. Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
24. Olson, A. & Cararnazza, A. (1994) Representation and connectionist models: The NETspell experience. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling. Theory, process and intervention (pp. 337-363). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
25. Patterson, K.E. & Shewell, C. (1987). Speak and spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. In M. Coltheart, G. Sartori & R. Job (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language (pp. 273-299). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S. & Patterson, K.S. (1995). Understanding normal and impaired word reading in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
27. Sakuma, N., Sasanuma, S., Tatsumi, I.F. & Masaki, S. (1998). Orthography and phonology in reading Japanese kanji words: Evidence from the semantic decision task with homophones. Memory & Cognition, 26, 75-87.
28. Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, J.L. (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
29. Seymour, P.H.K. & Dargie, A. (1990). Associative priming and orthographic choice in nonword spelling. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 395-410.
30. Shallice, T. (1981). Phonological agraphia and the lexical route in writing. Brain, 104, 413-429.
31. Shallice, T., Glasspool, D.W. & Houghton, G. (1995). Can neuropsychological evidence inform connectionist modelling? Analyses of spelling. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 195-225.
32. Stone, G.O., Vanhoy, M.D. & Van Orden, G.C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feed-forward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
33. Tan, L.H. & Perfetti, C.A. (1999). Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 382-393.
34. Taraban, R. & McClelland, J.L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
35. Tittenbrun, K. & Tittenbrun, M. (1994). Slownik ortograficzny [An orthographic dictionary.] (pp. 365-366). Warsaw: Kastor-Codex.
36. Treiman, R. & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
37. Treiman, R., Mullennix, L., Bijeljac-Babic, R. & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
38. Turvey, M.T., Feldman, L.B. & Lukatela, G. (1984). The Serbo-Croatian orthography constrains the reader to a phonologically analytic strategy. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics (pp. 81-89). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
39. Van Orden G.C. & Goldinger, S.D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
40. Van Orden, G.C., Bosman, A.M.T., Goldinger, S.D. & Farrar, W.T. (1997). A recurrent network account of reading, spelling and dyslexia. In J.W. Donahoe & V.P. Dorsel (Eds.), Neural network models of cognition: Biobehavioural foundations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
41. Zhang, S., Perfetti, C.A., & Yang, H. (1999). Whole-word, frequency-general phonology in semantic processing of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 858-875.