IT support for clinical pathways-lessons learned

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 124, Issue , 2006, Pages 645-650

  Lenz, R ^a   Blaser, R ^a   Beyer, M ^a   Heger, O ^a   Biber, C ^b   Baumlein M ^b   Schnabel, M ^b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

clinical pathways MeSH ; information systems MeSH ; interaction design; process alignment

Indexed keywords

MESH GENERATION;

CLINICAL PATHWAYS; INTERACTION DESIGN; INTERACTION MECHANISMS; IT INFRASTRUCTURES; ITERATIVE DESIGN; ITERATIVE IMPROVEMENTS; NUMBER OF ITERATIONS; REUSABLE COMPONENTS;

ITERATIVE METHODS;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PATHWAY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; GERMANY; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; GERMANY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS;

EID: 39049195525     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human. Building a Safer Health System. Washington D. C.: National Academy Press, 2000
2. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120(2): 135-142
3. Elson RB, Connelly DP. Computerized decision support systems in primary care. Prim Care 1995; 22(2): 365-384
4. Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6(2): 104-114
5. Sauer C. Deciding the future for IS failures: not the choice you might think. In: Curie W., Galliers R (Eds. ). Rethinking management information systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 279-309
6. Berg M, Aarts J, van der LJ. ICT in health care: Sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(4): 297-301
7. Lenz R, Büssecker F, Herlofsen H, Hinrichs F, Zeiler T, Kuhn KA. Demand-driven evolution of ITsystems in healthcare-a case study for improving interdisciplinary processes. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44(1): 4-10
8. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Organizational issues = change. Int J Med Inf 2003; 69(2-3): 197-203
9. Redfern S, Christian S. Achieving change in health care practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2003; 9(2): 225-238
10. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R, Fournier L. Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people. Int J Med Inf 2003; 69(2-3): 235-250
11. Lenz R, Kuhn KA. A strategic approach for business-IT alignment in health information systems. In: Meersman R, Tari Z, Schmidt DC (Eds. ): On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE; Springer Verlag, 2003: 178-195
12. Lenz R, Kuhn KA. Towards a continuous evolution and adaptation of information systems in healthcare. Int J Med Inf 2004; 73(1): 75-89
13. Kuhn KA, Lenz R, Elstner T, Siegele H, Moll R. Experiences with a generator tool for building clinical application modules. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(1): 37-44
14. Lenz R, Elstner T, Siegele H, Kuhn KA. A practical approach to process support in health information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9(6): 571-585
15. Beck K. Extreme Programming. München: Addison-Wesley, 2000
16. Blaser R, Schnabel M, Heger O, et. al. Improving Pathway Compliance and Clinician Performance by Using Information Technology. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 199-204
17. Poon AD, Fagan LM. PEN-Ivory: the design and evaluation of a pen-based computer system for structured data entry. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994;:447-51.: 447-451
18. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. Interaction Design-Beyond Human Computer Interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2002
19. Austin JL. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962
20. Searle JR. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.