Improving pathway compliance and clinician performance by using information technology

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 116, Issue , 2005, Pages 199-204

  Blaser, R ^a   Schnabel, M ^a   Heger, O ^a   Opitz, E ^a   Lenz, R ^a   Kuhn, K A ^b  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support systems; Clinical pathways; Systems integration; User acceptance

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; MEDICAL COMPUTING;

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; CLINICAL PATHWAYS; CLINICAL WORKFLOW; DECISION SUPPORTS; MEDICAL CENTER; PATIENT SPECIFIC; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; USER ACCEPTANCE;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

CLINICAL PATHWAY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; WORKFLOW;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; WORKFLOW;

EID: 33847158037     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, Lawthers AG, Localio AR, Barnes BA, Hebert L, Newhouse JP, Weiler PC, Hiatt H. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med 1991; 324(6):377-384.
2. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, Orav EJ, Zeena T, Williams EJ, Howard KM, Weiler PC, Brennan TA. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care 2000; 38(3):261-271.
3. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust 1995; 163(9):458-471.
4. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 1993;342:1317-22.
5. Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Brandt CA, Corb GJ. Computer-based guideline implementation systems: A systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6(2):104-114.
6. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120(2):135-142.
7. Elson RB, Connelly DP. Computerized decision support systems in primary care. Prim Care 1995; 22(2):365-384.
8. Zielstorff RD. Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles, and future prospects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(3):227-236.
9. Blaser R, Schnabel M, Mann D, Jancke P, Kuhn KA, Lenz R. Potential Prevention of Medical Errors in Casualty Surgery by Using Information Technology. In: Haddad HM, Papadopoulos GA, Omicini A, Wainwright RL, Liebrock LM, Palakal MJ, Andreou A, Pattichis C, eds. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2004). New York: ACM, 2004; pp. 285-290.
10. Kuhn KA, Lenz R, Elstner T, Siegele H, Moll R. Experiences with a generator tool for building clinical application modules. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42(1):37-44.
11. Lenz R, Elstner T, Siegele H, Kuhn KA. A practical approach to process support in health information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9(6):571-585.
12. Lenz R, Kuhn KA. Towards a Continuous Evolution and Adaptation of Information Systems in Healthcare. Int J Med Inf 2004; 73(1):75-89.
13. Anderson JG. Clearing the way for physicians' use of clinical information systems. Communications of the ACM 1997; 40(8):83-90.