Use of comparative data for integrated cancer services

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Wilkinson, Dawn L ^a   McCarthy, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER CENTER; CANCER REGISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEOPLASM; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEPHONE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CANCER CARE FACILITIES; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; ENGLAND; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT TEAMS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS; TELEPHONE; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 39049171836     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-204     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. The NHS Cancer plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. UK Department of Health, London, Department of Health 2000
2. Manual for cancer services. UK Department of Health, London, Department of Health 2004
3. NHS Cancer Information Strategy. UK Department of Health, London, Department of Health 2000
4. Assessing quality using administrative data. LI Iezzoni, Annals of Internal Medicine 1997 127 666 674 9382378
5. Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. B Jarman S Gault B Alves A Hider S Dolan A Cook B Hurwitz LI Iezzoni, British Medical Journal 1999 318 1515 20 10356004
6. Uses of performance metrics in clinical and managerial networks. P Guven-Uslu, Public Money and Management 2006 26 95 100 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006. 00507.x
7. Impact of published clinical outcomes data: case study in NHS hospital trusts. R Mannion M Goddard, British Medical Journal 2001 323 260 63 11485954 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.260
8. Attitudes to the public release of comparative information on the quality of general practice care: qualitative study. MN Marshall J Hiscock B Sibbald, British Medical Journal 2002 325 1278 12458248 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1278
9. The organizational context and use of routine data for cancer service management. D Wilkinson E Ferlie R Addicott M McCarthy, Submitted to Public Money and Management 2007
10. The use and perceptions of routine health data: a qualitative study of four cancer network teams in England. D Wilkinson S Michie M McCarthy, Health Serv Manage Res 2007 20 4 211 219 10.1258/095148407782219058 17958966
11. Networks, Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: NHS Cancer Networks. R Addicott G McGivern E Ferlie, Public Money and Management 2005 26 87 94 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00506.x
12. Data uses, benefits, and barriers for the behavioral risk factor surveillance system: a qualitative study of users. Y Bloom LW Figgs EA Baker K Dugbatey CA Stanwyck RC Brownson, J Public Health Manage Pract 2000 6 1 78 86
13. Measures of quality in cancer services. Scientific summary. London. M McCarthy, NHS National Institute for Health Research 2003 http://www.sdo.lshtm. ac.uk/sdo652003.html
14. National Cancer Services Analysis Team Cancer networks by PCT. 2006 http://www.canceruk.net/natcansat/location.htm
15. Manual of Cancer Services. Department of Health, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Policyandguidance/Healthandsocialcaretopics/Cancer/index.htm
16. Enhancing performance in health care: A theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. M Goddard R Mannion P Smith, Health Economics 2000 9 95 107 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200003)9:2<95::AID-HEC488>3.0.CO;2-A 10721012
17. Do English NHS waiting times targets distort treatment priorities in orthopaedics? J Appleby S Boyle N Devlin M Harley A Harrison R Thorlby, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2005 10 167 72 10.1258/1355819054339022
18. Nothing in - nothing out: Barriers to the use of performance data in social service programs. TE Carrilio T Packard JD Clapp, Administration in Social Work 2003 27 61 75 10.1300/J147v27n04_05
19. The role of performance indicators in changing the autonomy of the general practice profession in the UK. M Exworthy EK Wilkinson A McColl M Moore P Roderick H Smith J Gabbay, Social Science and Medicine 2003 56 1493 504 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00151-X