The use and perceptions of routine health data: A qualitative study of four cancer network teams in England

Health Services Management Research

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 211-219

  Wilkinson, Dawn ^a   Michie, Susan ^a   McCarthy, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NEOPLASM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; STATISTICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ENGLAND; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 39049132383     PISSN: 09514848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/095148407782219058     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brittain JM, Macdougall J. Information as a resource in the National-health-service. Int J Inform Manage 1995;15:127-133
2. Wanless D. Securing Our Future Health: Taking a Long-Term View. London: HM Treasury, 2002
3. Department of Health NHS Executive. Information for Health. London: Department of Health NHS Executive, 1998
4. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, a Plan for Reform. London: Department of Health/HMSO, 2000
5. Lefkovitz PM. Beyond outcomes: benchmarking in behavioral healthcare. Behav Healthc Tom 2004;13:32-37
6. Mannion R, Davies HTO. Reporting health care performance: learning from the past, prospects for the future. J Eval Clin Pract 2002;8:215-228 (Pubitemid 34685898)
7. Mannion R, Davies H, Marshall M. Impact of star performance ratings in English acute hospital trusts. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10:18-24
8. Powell AE, Davies HTO, Thomson RG. Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Qua Saf Health Care 2003;12:122-128
9. Department of Health. Cancer Information Strategy. London: Department of Health, 2000
10. The Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services. London: Department of Health, 1995
11. Black N, Payne M. Directory of clinical databases: improving and promoting their use. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:348-352 (Pubitemid 37311003)
12. Hollingsworth B, Parkin D. Efficiency and productivity change in the English National Health Service: can data envelopment analysis provide a robust and useful measure? J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8:230-236
13. Exworthy M, Wilkinson EK, McColl A et al. The role of performance indicators in changing the autonomy of the general practice profession in the UK. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:1493-1504 (Pubitemid 36279483)
14. Mannion R, Goddard M. Impact of published clinical outcomes data: case study in NHS hospital trusts. BMJ 2001;323:260-263 (Pubitemid 32729112)
15. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage Publications, 2004
16. Pope C, Mays N. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:42-45
17. Addicott R, McGivern G, Ferlie E. Networks, organisational learning and knowledge management: NHS cancer networks. Public Money Manage 2006;26:87-94
18. Bloom Y, Figgs LW, Baker EA et al. Data uses, benefits, and barriers for the behavioural risk factor surveillance system: a qualitative study of users. J Public Health Manage Pract 2000;6:78-86
19. Ferlie E, Addicott R. The Introduction, Impact and Performance of Cancer Networks. London: School of Management CPSO, RHUL, 2004
20. Smith JA, Osborn M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith JA, ed. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage, 2003:51-80
21. Lakhani A, Coles J, Eayres D et al. Creative use of existing clinical and health outcomes data to assess NHS performance in England: Part 1 - performance indicators closely linked to clinical care. BMJ 2005;330:1426-1431 (Pubitemid 40874125)
22. Lakhani A, Coles J, Eayres D et al. Creative use of existing clinical and health outcomes data to assess NHS performance in England: Part 2 - More challenging aspects of monitoring. BMJ 2005;330:1486-1492 (Pubitemid 40897259)
23. Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D et al. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 2004;363:1147-1154 (Pubitemid 38452790)
24. Goddard M, Mannion R, Smith P. Enhancing performance in health care: a theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. Health Econ 2004;9:95-107 (Pubitemid 30148157)
25. Edwards N. Clinical networks. Advantages include flexibility, strength, speed, and focus on clinical issues. BMJ 2002;324:63
26. Ferlie E, Hawkins C, Kewell B. Managed networks within cancer services: an organisational perspective. In: R James, A Miles, eds. Managed Care Networks. London: Aesculapius Medical Press, 2002:1-13
27. Brittain JM, Norris AC. Delivery of health informatics education and training. Health Libr Rev 2000;17:117-128