Postscript: Rejoinder to Brandstätter et al. (2008)

Psychological Review

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 260-262

  Birnbaum, Michael ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 39049158290     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.260     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Birnbaum M.H. The devil rides again: Correlation as an index of fit. Psychological Bulletin 79 (1973) 239-242
2. Birnbaum M.H. Reply to the Devil's advocates: Don't confound model testing and measurement. Psychological Bulletin 81 (1974) 854-859
3. Birnbaum M.H. Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet. Psychological Science 10 (1999) 399-407
4. Birnbaum M.H. Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: An experimental dissection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 48 2 (2004) 87-106
5. Birnbaum M.H. Tests of rank-dependent utility and cumulative prospect theory in gambles represented by natural frequencies: Effects of format, event framing, and branch splitting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 95 (2004) 40-65
6. Birnbaum M.H. A comparison of five models that predict violations of first-order stochastic dominance in risky decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 31 (2005) 263-287
7. Birnbaum M.H. Evidence against prospect theories in gambles with positive, negative, and mixed consequences. Journal of Economic Psychology 27 (2006) 737-761
8. Birnbaum, M. H. (2007). Testing heuristic models of decision making: Priority dominance, dimension integration, and dimension interaction. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Birnbaum M.H. Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review 115 (2008) 253-262
10. Birnbaum M.H., and Chavez A. Tests of theories of decision making: Violations of branch independence and distribution independence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71 2 (1997) 161-194
11. Birnbaum M.H., and Gutierrez R.J. Testing for intransitivity of preferences predicted by a lexicographic semiorder. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 (2007) 97-112
12. Birnbaum M.H., and McIntosh W.R. Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 (1996) 91-110
13. Birnbaum M.H., and Navarrete J.B. Testing descriptive utility theories: Violations of stochastic dominance and cumulative independence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 17 (1998) 49-78
14. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., and Hertwig R. Risky choice with heuristics: Reply to Birnbaum (2008); Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, & Willemsen (2008); and Rieger & Wang (2008). Psychological Review (2008)
15. Erev, I., Roth, A. E., Slonim, R. L., & Barron, G. (2002). Combining a theoretical prediction with experimental evidence to yield a new prediction: An experimental design with a random sample of tasks. Unpublished manuscript, Columbia University and Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Techion, Haifa, Israel.
16. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979) 263-291