Reporting health care performance: Learning from the past, prospects for the future

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 215-228

  Mannion, Russell ^a   Davies, Huw T O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical indicators; International lessons; Public dissemination; Report cards; US experience

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; JOB PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DATA COLLECTION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036280239     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00331.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Clinical indicators and their role in management
2. The doctor as double agent
3. Dicing with death rates
4. How Pennsylvania hospitals have responded to publicly released reports on coronary artery bypass graft surgery
5. What do managers and physicians prefer as indicators of clinical outcome?
6. Beyond health outcomes: The advantages of measuring process
7. Performance management using health outcomes: In search of instrumentality
8. Public release of performance data and quality improvement: Internal responses to external data by US health care providers
9. Interpreting health outcomes
10. Performance indicators in health care: Guiding lights or wreckers' lanterns?
11. Trust in performance indicators
12. Clinical governance: Striking a balance between checking and trusting
13. The rise of oversight and the decline of mutuality
14. Public disclosure of performance data. Does the public get what the public wants?
15. UK and US health care systems: Divided by more than a common language
16. Managing patient trust in managed care
17. Rolling down the runway: The challenges ahead for quality report cards
18. Public release of performance data: A progress report from the front
19. Enhancing performance in health care: A theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information
20. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State
21. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York state
22. Will quality report cards help consumers?
23. Can Medicare beneficiaries make informed choices?
24. Choosing a health plan: Do large employers use the data?
25. Identifying poor-quality hospitals: Can hospital mortality rates detect quality problems for medical diagnoses?
26. The risks of risk adjustment
27. Severity measurement methods and judging hospital death rates for pneumonia
28. The facts about FACCT (Foundation for Accountability)
29. Measuring what matters to the public
30. External evaluation of health care in Italy
31. Public disclosure of performance data: Learning from the US experience
32. Public reporting of performance: Lessons from the USA
33. What do we expect to gain from the public release of performance data? A review of the evidence
34. Choosing and evaluating clinical performance measures
35. Changing medical organization and the erosion of trust
36. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians
37. Accountability for health sector performance: What does the New Zealand public want?
38. Use of public performance reports: A survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery
39. Physicians as double agents: Maintaining trust in an era of multiple accountabilities
40. On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector
41. Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector
42. Maryland Hospital Quality Indicator Project in the United Kingdom: An approach for promoting continuous quality improvement
43. Consumers and hospital use: The HCFA 'death list