Breast MRI in nonpalpable breast lesions: A randomized trial with diagnostic and therapeutic outcome - MONET - Study

Trials

Volumn 8, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Peters, Nicky H G M ^a   Borel Rinkes, Inne H M ^a   Mali, Willem P T M ^a   van den Bosch, Maurice A A J ^a   Storm, Remmert K ^b   Plaisier, Peter W ^b   de Boer, Erwin ^c   van Overbeeke, Adriaan J ^c   Peeters, Petra H M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ALBERT SCHWEITZER HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c MEANDER MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38949211432     PISSN: 17456215     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-40     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Jemal A Siegel R Ward E Murray T Xu J Smigal C Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 2006, 56:106-130. 16514137
2. Incidence of breast cancer in the Netherlands 1999/2000. Eleventh report of the Netherlands cancer registry. 2003 Edition1.0
3. National evaluation of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands 2002
4. Smith-Bindman R Chu PW Miglioretti DL Sickles EA Blanks R Ballard-Barbash R Bobo JK Lee NC Wallis MG Patnick J Kerlikowske K: Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA 2003, 290:2129-2137. 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129 14570948
5. Hrung JM Sonnad SS Schwartz JS Langlotz CP: Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: A diagnostic meta-analysis. Acad Radiol 1999, 6:387-397. 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80189-5 10410164
6. Peters NH Borel Rinkes IH Zuithoff NP Mali WP Moons KG Peeters PH: Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology 2008, 246(1):116-24. 18024435
7. Boetes C Mus RD Holland R Barentsz JO Strijk SP Wobbes T Hendriks JH Ruys SH; Breast tumors: Comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995, 197:743-747. 7480749
8. Hlawatsch A Teifke A Schmidt M Thelen M: Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002, 179:1493-1501. 12438043
9. Kacl GM Liu P Debatin JF Garzoli E Caduff RF Krestin GP: Detection of breast cancer with conventional mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 1998, 8:194-200. 10.1007/s003300050362 9477265
10. Malur S Wurdinger S Moritz A Michels W Schneider A: Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res 2001, 3:55-60. 13900 11250746 10.1186/bcr271
11. Mumtaz H Hall-Craggs MA Davidson T Walmsley K Thurell W Kissin MW Taylor I: Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997, 169:417-424. 9242745
12. Sardanelli F Giuseppetti GM Panizza P Bazzocchi M Fausto A Simonetti G Lattanzio V Del MA: Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004, 183:1149-1157. 15385322
13. Schelfout K Van GM Kersschot E Colpaert C Schelfhout AM Leyman P Verslegers I Biltjes I Van Den HJ Gillardin JP Tjalma W Van Der Auwera JC Buytaert P De SA: Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004, 30:501-507. 10.1016/ j.ejso.2004.02.003 15135477
14. Hwang ES Kinkel K Esserman LJ Lu Y Weidner N Hylton NM; Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol 2003, 10:381-388. 10.1245/ ASO.2003.03.085 12734086
15. Kristoffersen WM Aspelin P Sylvan M Bone B: Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms. Eur Radiol 2003, 13:1207-1212. 12764634
16. Amano G Ohuchi N Ishibashi T Ishida T Amari M Satomi S: Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000, 60:43-55. 10.1023/A:1006342711426 10845808
17. www.clinicaltrails.gov 2006 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT00302120?term=monet&rank=1
18. Ikeda DM Hylton NM Kinkel K Hochman MG Kuhl CK Kaiser WA Weinreb JC Smazal SF Degani H Viehweg P Barclay J Schnall MD: Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 13:889-895. 10.1002/jmri.1127 11382949
19. Fischer U KoEka L Grabbe E: Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999, 213:881-888. 10580970
20. Kuhl CK: MRI of breast tumors. Eur Radiol 2000, 10:46-58. 10.1007/ s003300050006 10663717
21. Hoorntje LE Peeters PH Mali WP Borel R.I. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?1498. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004, 86:165-170. 10.1023/ B:BREA.0000032984.56442.35 15319568
22. Fischer U Zachariae O Baum F von HD Funke M Liersch T: The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer1497. Eur Radiol 2004, 14:1725-1731. 15248080
23. Hoorntje LE: NonpalpabCe breast lesions: challenges in diagnosis and treatment Thesis Utrecht, The Netherlands 2003.
24. Intra M Zurrida S Maffini F Sonzogni A Trifiro G Gennari R Arnone P Bassani G Opazo A Paganelli G Viale G Veronesi U: Sentinel lymph node metastasis in microinvasive breast cancer1496. Ann Surg Oncol 2003, 10:1160-1165. 10.1245/ASO.2003.04.009 14654471
25. Verkooijen HM: Stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease. The COBRA study. Thesis Utrecht, The Netherlands 2000.
26. Estourgie SH: Excisional biopsy of breast lesions. Changes in the drainage pattern: A reproducibility study of lymphoscintigraphy Thesis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2004.
27. Bedrosian I Mick R Orel SG Schnall M Reynolds C Spitz FR Callans LS Buzby GP Rosato EF Fraker DL Czerniecki BJ: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 2003, 98:468-473. 10.1002/cncr.11490 12879462