Brief assessment of motor function: Content validity and reliability of the fine motor scale

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 315-325

  Parks, Rebecca ^a,e   Cintas, Holly Lea ^a   Chaffin, Maisie Chou ^b,c   Gerber, Lynn ^a,d  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b YESHIVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BELLEVUE HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^d GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MSC 1604 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Child development; Childhood disability; Content validity; Motor performance; Motor skills; Rehabilitation; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTENT VALIDITY; FEMALE; FINE MOTOR SCALE; HUMAN; HYPOPITUITARISM; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PEDIATRICS; PROTEUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SMITH LEMLI OPITZ SYNDROME; SMITH MAGENIS SYNDROME; VIDEOTAPE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CLASSIFICATION; HANDICAPPED CHILD; INFANT; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS SCREENING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOMOTOR DISORDER; REPRODUCIBILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DISABLED CHILDREN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MOTOR SKILLS; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 38949202418     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181588616     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Case-Smith J, Heaphy T, Marr D, et al. Fine motor and functional performance outcomes in preschool children. Am J Occup Ther. 1998;52:788-796.
2. Case-Smith J. Grasp, release and bimanual skills in the first two years of life. In: Henderson A, Pehoski C, ed. Hand Function in the Child. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995:113-135.
3. Henderson A. Self-care and hand skill. In: Henderson A, Pehoski C, ed. Hand Function in the Child. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995:164-183.
4. Pehoski C, Henderson A, Tickle-Degnen L. In-hand manipulation in young children: translation movements. Am J Occup Ther. 1997;51:719-728.
5. Exner CE. In-hand manipulation skills in normal young children. Occup Ther Pract. 1990;1:63-72.
6. Russell DJ, Ward M, Law M. Test-retest reliability of the Fine Motor Scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales in children with cerebral-palsy. Occup Ther J Res. 1994;14:178-182.
7. Hemgren E, Persson K. Motor performance and behaviour in preterm and full-term 3- year-old children. Child Care Health Dev. 2002;28:219-226.
8. Goyen TA, Lui K. Longitudinal motor development of "apparently normal" high-risk infants at 18 months, 3 and 5 years. Early Hum Dev. 2002;70:103-115.
9. Singh G, Athreya BH, Fries JF, et al. Measurement of health-status in children with juvenile rheumatoid-arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37:1761-1769.
10. Stamm TA, Machold KP, Eberl G, et al. Using Moberg Picking-Up Test to measure fine motor hand function in patients with inflammatory joint disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1963.
11. Hermann W, Caca K, Eggers B, et al. Genotype correlation with fine motor symptoms in patients with Wilson's disease. Eur Neurol. 2002;48:97-101.
12. Hermsdorfer J, Hagl E, Nowak DA, et al. Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:915-929.
13. Binder LM, Kelly MP, Villanueva MR, et al. Motivation and neuropsychological test performance following mild head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25:420-430.
14. Johnk K, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Stolze H, et al. Assessment of sensorimotor functions after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood - methodological aspects. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1999;14:143-152.
15. Wachtel RC, McGrath C, Houck DL, et al. Fine motor testing in children - not fine. Pediatr AIDS HIV Infect: Fetus Adolesc. 1994;5:86-88.
16. Merlo MCG, Hofer H, Gekle W, et al. Risperidone, 2 mg/day vs. 4 mg/day, in first-episode, acutely psychotic patients: treatment efficacy and effects on fine motor functioning. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:885-891.
17. Contreras-Vidal JL, Teulings HL, Stelmach GE. Elderly subjects are impaired in spatial coordination in fine motor control. Acta Psychol. 1998;100:25-35.
18. Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Bravo G, et al. The Purdue Pegboard Test - normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disabil Rehabil. 1995;17:217-224.
19. Smith CD, Umberger GH, Manning EL, et al. Critical decline in fine motor hand movements in human aging. Neurology. 1999;53:1458-1461.
20. Krampe RT. Aging, expertise and fine motor movement. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:769-776.
21. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales [manual]. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2000.
22. Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards [manual]. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources; 1983.
23. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1978.
24. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, et al. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50:311-319.
25. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, et al. Adult norms for the 9-hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res. 1985;5:24-38.
26. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, et al. Investigation of a new motor-assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65:175-180.
27. Tiffin J. Purdue Pegboard Examiner Manual. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates; 1968.
28. Smith HB. Smith hand function evaluation. Am J Occup Ther. 1973;27:244-251.
29. Gallus J, Mathiowetz V. Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:108-111.
30. Gebhard AR, Ottenbacher KJ, Lane SJ. Interrater reliability of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Fine Motor Scale. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48:976-981.
31. Hassan MM. Validity and reliability for the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Short Form as applied in the United Arab Emirates culture. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;92:157-166.
32. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor-assessment scale for stroke patients - concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:195-197.
33. Smith YA, Hong ES, Presson C. Normative and validation studies of the Nine-hole Peg Test with children. Percept Mot Skills. 2000;90:823-843.
34. Stokes NA, Deitz JL, Crowe TK. The Peabody Developmental Fine Motor Scale - an interrater reliability study. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44:334-340.
35. Vlieland TPMV, vanderWijk TP, Jolie IMM, et al. Determinants of hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:835-840.
36. Hardin M. Assessment of hand function and fine motor coordination in the geriatric population. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2002;18:18-27.
37. Cintas HL, Siegel KL, Furst GP, et al. Brief assessment of motor function - reliability and concurrent validity of the Gross Motor Scale. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:33-41.
38. Cintas HL. Cross cultural similarities and differences in development and the impact of parental expectations on motor behavior. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1995;7:101-111.
39. Darrah J, Hodge M, Magill-Evans J, et al. Stability of serial assessments of motor and communication abilities in typically developing infants - implications for screening. Early Hum Dev. 2003;72:97-110.
40. Reuben DB, Siu AL. An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990;38:1105-1112.
41. Binder EF, Miller JP, Ball LJ. Development of a test of physical performance for the nursing home setting. Gerontologist. 2001;41:671-679.
42. Benson J, Clark F. A guide for instrument development and validation. Am J Occup Ther. 1982;36:789-800.
43. American Psychological Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1985.
44. American Physical Therapy Association. Standards for Tests and Measurements in Physical Therapy Practice. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 1991.
45. Dunn WW. Validity. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1989;9:149 -168.
46. Exner CE. Content validity of the in-hand manipulation test. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47:505-513.
47. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Faas RM. A content validity study of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1991;3:177-184.
48. Harris SR, Daniels LE. Content validity of the Harris infant neuromotor test. Phys Ther. 1996;76:727-737.
49. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
50. Dennis JL, Swinth Y. Pencil grasp and children's handwriting legibility during different-length writing tasks. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:175-183.
51. Bergmann KP. Incidence of atypical pencil grasps among nondysfunctional adults. Am J Occup Ther. 1990;44:736-740.