Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis

Scoliosis

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Kotwicki, Tomasz ^a   Kinel, Edyta ^a   Stryla, Wanda ^a   Szulc, Andrzej ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949166720     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17487161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-2-18     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Weiss HR Negrini S Rigo M Kotwicki T Hawes MC Grivas TB Maruyama T Landauer F Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines) Scoliosis 2006 1:5. 8 May 2006 1479370 16759357 10.1186/ 1748-7161-1-5
2. Suzuki N Inami K Ono T Kohno K Asher MA Analysis of Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI) in Scoliosis Stud Health Technol Inform 1999, 59:81-4.
3. Bunnell WP An objective criterion for scoliosis screening J Bone Joint Surg 1984 66-A:1381-7.
4. Cobb JR Outline for the study of scoliosis AAOS 1948, 7:261-75.
5. Bunnell WP Selective screening for scoliosis Clin Orthop 2005, 434:40-45. 15864030
6. Grivas TB Vasiliadis ES Mihas C Savidou O The effect of growth on the correlation between the spinal and rib cage deformity: Implications on idiopathic scoliosis pathogenesis Scoliosis 2007, 2:11. 2040132 17868459 10.1186/1748-7161-2-11
7. Kotwicki T Frydryk K Lorkowska M Krawczynski A Szulc A Intraobserver and interobserver variability of the assessment of trunk rotation with Bunnell scoliometer in children with idiopathic scoliosis Pol J Physiotherapy 2006, 6:111-6.
8. Stokes IA Armstrong JG Moreland MS Spinal deformity and back surface asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis J Orthop Res 1988, 6:129-37. 10.1002/ jor.1100060117 3334733
9. James JIP Scoliosis Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 1976
10. Minguez MF Buendia M Cibrian RM Salvador R Laguia M Martin A Gomar F Quantifier variables of the back surface deformity obtained with a noninvasive structured light method: Evaluation of their usefulness in idiopathic scoliosis diagnosis Eur Spine J 2007, 16:73-82. 10.1007/ s00586-006-0079-y 16609858
11. Thulborne T Gillespie R The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurements, analysis and response to treatment J Bone Joint Surg 1976, 58-B:64-71.
12. Ono T Trunk deformity in scoliosis studied by surface measurement Nippon Seikeigeka 1995, 69:915-26.
13. Grosso C Negrini S Boniolo A Negrini A The validity of clinical examination in adolescent spinal deformities Stud Health Technol Inform 2002, 91:123-5 15462010
14. Goldberg CJ Kaliszer M Moore DP Fogarty EE Dowling FE Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis Spine 2001, 26:E55-E63. 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00005 11224901
15. Goldberg CJ Groves D Moore DP Fogarty EE Dowling FE Surface topography and vectors: A new measure for the three-dimensional quantification of scoliotic deformity Stud Health Technol Inform 2006, 123:449-55. 17108467
16. Grivas TB Dangas S Polyzois BD Samelis P The double rib contour sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: Aetiologic implications for scoliosis Stud Health Technol Inform 2002, 88:38-43. 15456003
17. D'Amato CR Griggs S McCoy B Nighttime bracing with providence brace in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis Spine 2001, 26:2006-12. 10.1097/00007632-200109150-00014 11547201
18. Olafsson Y Saraste H Soderlund V Hoffsten M Boston brace in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis J Pediatr Orthop 1995, 15:524-7. 7560048
19. Yrjonen T Ylikoski M Schlenzka D Poussa M Results of brace treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys compared with girls: A retrospective study of 102 patients treated with the Boston brace Eur Spine J 2007, 16:393-7. 10.1007/s00586-006-0167-z 16909249
20. Coillard C Leroux MA Zabjek KF Rivard CH SpineCor - a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Post-treatment results Eur Spine J 2003. 12;141-8. 12709852
21. Emans JB Kaelin A Bancel P Hall JE Miller ME The Boston bracing system for idiopathic scoliosis. Follow-up results in 295 patients Spine 1986, 11:792-801. 10.1097/00007632-198610000-00009 3810295
22. Katz DE Durrani AA Factors that influence outcome in bracing large curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Spine 2001, 26:2354-61 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00012 11679821
23. Richards BS Bernstein RM d'Amato CR Thompson GH Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies Spine 2005, 30:206875. 10.1097/01.brs.0000178819.90239.d0 16166897
24. Rigo M 3D correction of trunk deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis using Cheneau brace Stud Health Technol Inform 1999, 59:362-5.
25. Rigo M Radiological and cosmetic improvement 2 years after brace weaning - a case report Ped Rehab 2003, 6:195-9. 10.1080/13638490310001636826
26. Grivas TB Vasiliadis E Koufopoulos G Triantafyllopoulos G Savvidou O Mouzakis V The scoliotcs' surface deformitychanges treated with Dynamic Derotation Brace 14th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques IMAST, Bahamas 2007, July 11-14, e-poster 686.
27. Nachemson AL Peterson LE Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis J Bone Joint Surg 1995, 77-A:815-22.
28. Pham VM Herbaux B Schill A Thevenon A Evaluation of the Cheneau brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Ann Readapt Med Phys 2007, 50:125-133. 17174434
29. Weiss HR Clinical improvement and radiological progression in a girl with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated conservatively - case report Scoliosis 2006, 1:13. 26 July 2006 1559640 16872503 10.1186/ 1748-7161-1-13
30. Weinstein SL Dolan LA Spratt KF Peterson KK Spoonamore MJ Ponseti IV Health and function of patients with untreated idiopathic scoliosis. A 50-year natural history study JAMA 2003, 289:559-67. 10.1001/ jama.289.5.559 12578488