Surface topography and vectors: A new measure for the three dimensional quantification of scoliotic deformity

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 123, Issue , 2006, Pages 449-455

  Goldberg, C J ^a   Grove, D ^b   Moore, D P ^a   Fogarty, E E ^a   Dowling, F E ^a  

^a OUR LADY S CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Scoliosis; Surface topography; Three dimensional measurement

Indexed keywords

COSMETICS; DEFORMATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; TOPOGRAPHY;

ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING; ASYMMETRY; PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS; SCOLIOSIS; SCOLIOTIC DEFORMITIES; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL DISPLACEMENTS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENTS;

SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BACK; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SCOLIOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; BACK; CHILD; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 38949114083     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Cobb JR. (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. AAOS. 7:261-275.
2. Carman D. L. Browne RH. Birch JG. (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. J.Bone &Joint Surg. 72(A):328-333.
3. Morrissey RT. Goldsmith GS. Hall EC. Kehl D. Cowie G. (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J.Bone &Joint Surg. 72(A):320-327.
4. Thulbourne T. Gillespie R. (1976) The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J.Bone &Joint Surg. 58-B(1):64-71.
5. Carr AJ. Jefferson RJ. Turner-Smith AR. Beavis A. (1991) An analysis of normal back shape measured by ISIS scanning. Spine. 16(6):656-659.
6. Curran P. Groves D. (1990) Assessing spinal deformities. Image Processing, Capture, Management and Analysis. 2:14-16.
7. Denton TE. Randall FM. Deinlein DA. (1992) The use of instant Moiré photographs to reduce exposure from scoliosis radiographs. Spine. 17(5):509-512
8. Theologies TEN. Jefferson RJ. Simpson HARD. Turner-Smith AR. Fairbanks JCT. (1993) Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 18(7):909-912.
9. Goldberg CJ. Kaliszer M. Moore DP. Fogarty EE. Dowling FE. (2001) Surface topography, Cobb angles and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine. 26:E55-63.
10. Lyon R. Liu XC. Thometz JG. Nelson ER. Logan B. (2004) Reproducibility of spinal back-contour measurements taken with Raster stereography in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The American Journal of Orthopaedics. February 2004. 67-70.
11. Sake SA. Wick A. Marinade S. Mehta MH. (1995) Reproducibility and reliability of the Quantec Surface Imaging System in the assessment of spinal deformity. Proceedings of the 2nd. International Symposium on Three Dimensional Scoliotic Deformities combined with the 8th. International Symposium on Surface Topography and Spinal Deformity. Three dimensional analysis of spinal deformity. Ed. D'Amico et al. IONS Press. 441-445.
12. Thometz JG. Liu XC. Lyon R. Harris GF. (2000) Variability in three-dimensional measurements of back contour with Raster stereography in normal subjects. J.Pediatr. Orthop. 20:54-58.
13. Thometz JG. Lamdam R. Liu XC. Lyon R. (2000) Relationship between Quantec measurement and Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J.Pediatr. Orthop. 20:512-516
14. Remington RD. Schork MA. (1970) Statistics with applications to the biological and health sciences, p. 188. Eaglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.