Food and trust in Australia: Building a picture

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 237-245

  Coveney, John ^a  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Food choice; Food safety; Qualitative research; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATERING SERVICE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD QUALITY; FOOD SAFETY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD LABELING; FOOD POISONING; FOOD SUPPLY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SOUTH AUSTRALIA; TRUST;

EID: 38949163657     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980007000250     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Chronic Diseases and Associated Risk Factors in Australia, 2001. Canberra: AIHW, 2002.
2. Murcott A, ed. The Nation's Diet: The Social Science of Food Choice. London: Longman, 1998.
3. Baum F. The New Public Health: The Australian Experience. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1998.
4. Lang T, Heasman M. The Food Wars, Public Health and the Battle for Mouths Minds and Markets. London: Earthscan Publication, 2004.
5. Coveney J. Food security and sustainability: are we selling ourselves short? Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 9: S97-100.
6. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. ACCC watches new labelling of GM foods [online], 18 January 2002. Available at http://www.accc.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/87952. Accessed 29 March 2007.
7. Beers M. Haemolytic-uraemic syndrome: of sausages and legislation. Australian New Zealand Journal of Public Health 1996; 20(5): 462-6.
8. Anon. Listeria widow searches for answers. Adelaide Advertiser, 30 December 2005; 2.
9. Prescott V, Campbell P, Moore A, Matles J, Rothenburg ME, Foster PS, et al. Transgenic expression of bean alpha-amylase inhibitor in peas results in altered structure and immunogenicity. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2005; 53(23): 9023-30.
10. Sjoberg L. Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis 2001; 21(1): 189-98.
11. Williams P, Stirling E, Keynes N. Food fears: a national survey on the attitudes of Australian adults about the safety and quality of food. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2004; 13(1): 32-9.
12. Lang T. The complexities of globalisation: the UK as a case study of tensions within the food system and the challenge to food policy. Agriculture and Human Values 1999; 16(2): 169-85.
13. Cade J, Calvert C, Barrett J. How could the BSE crisis affect nutrient intake? Comparison of beef and non-beef eating meat eaters from the UK Women's Cohort Study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1998; 52(5): 151-2.
14. Lea E, Worsley A. Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite 2001; 36(2): 127-36.
15. Masood E. UK panel formed to rebuild trust in government science advice. Nature 1999; 397(6719): 458.
16. Coulson NS. Source of food safety information: whom do adolescents trust? Appetite 2002; 38(3): 199-200.
17. Food Commission. Cause or Compromise?: A Survey into Marketing Partnerships between Food Companies and Health Charities or Medical Associations. London: The Food Commission, 2002.
18. Coombes R. Public distrusts government health campaigns, experts say. British Medical Journal 2005; 331(7508): 70.
19. Anon. Trust food labels. Adelaide Advertiser, 19 January 2002; 51.
20. Hansen J, Holm L, Frewer L, Robinson P, Sandoe P. Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 2003; 41(2): 111-21.
21. MacIntyre S, Reilly J, Miller D, Eldridge J, eds. Food Choice, Media Scares, and Health: The Role of the Media. Harlow: Longman, 1998.
22. Starr G, Langley A, Taylor A. Environmental Health Risk Perceptions in Australia: A Research Report to the enHealth Council. Adelaide: Centre for Population Studies in Epidemiology, South Australian Department of Human Services, 2000.
23. Lupton DA. Lay discourses and beliefs related to food risks: an Australian perspective. Sociology of Health and Illness 2005; 27(4): 448-67.
24. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods, 2nd ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2005.
25. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal 1995; 311(6997): 109-12.
26. Coveney J. Food, Morals and Meaning: The Pleasure and Anxiety of Eating. London: Routledge, 2006.
27. Fischler C. Food, self and identity. Social Science Information 1988; 27(2): 275-92.
28. Freudenburg W. Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perception. Journal of Social Issues 1993; 71(4): 909-32.
29. Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Analysis 1993; 13(6): 675-82.
30. Frewer L, Lassen J, Kettlitz B, Scholderer J, Beekman V, Berdal KG. Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2004; 42(7): 1181-93.
31. Poppes C, Kjaernes U. Trust in Food in Europe. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research, 2003.
32. Lang T. Food industrialisation and food power: implications for food governance. Development Policy Review 2003; 21(5-6): 555-68.
33. Oakley A. Interviewing women - a contradiction in terms. In: Roberts H, ed. Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
34. Sirieix L, Schaer B. Buying Organic Food in France: Shopping Habits and Trust [online], 19 December 2005. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/p/ wpa/wuwpot/0512010.html. Accessed 30 May 2007.
35. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Nutrition, Health and Related Claims. Canberra: FSANZ, 2005.
36. Zimmet P, James P. The unstoppable Australian obesity and diabetes juggernaut: What should politicians do? Medical Journal of Australia 2006; 185(4): 187-8.
37. Beard T, Nowson C, Riley M. Traffic-light food labels (letter). Medical Journal of Australia 2007; 1(1): 19.
38. Rothstein H. Escaping the regulatory net: why regulatory reform can fail consumers. Law and Policy 2005; 27(4): 520-48.