Stability and kinetic properties of C5-domain from myosin binding protein candits mutants

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1403-1411

  Guardiani, Carlo ^a   Cecconi, Fabio ^b   Livi, Roberto ^c  

^a INFN SEZIONE DI FIRENZE   (Italy)

^b INFM   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEIN; MYOSIN BINDING PROTEIN C; MYOSIN-BINDING PROTEIN C; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CARRIER PROTEINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY;

EID: 38949163021     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.106625     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Winegrad, S. 2000. Myosin binding protein C, a potential regulator of cardiac contractility. Circ. Res. 86:6-7.
2. Mogensen, J., I. C. Klausen, A. K. Pedersen, H. Egeblad, P. Bross, T. A. Kruse, N. Gregersen, P. S. Hansen, U. Baandrup, and A. D. Boørglum. 1999. α-Cardiac actin is a novel disease gene in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J. Clin. Invest. 103:R39-R43.
3. Charron, P., O. Dubourg, M. Desnos, R. Isnard, R. Hagege, G. Bonne, L. Carrier, F. Tesón, J. B. Bouhour, J.-C. Buzzi, J. Feingold, K. Schwartz, and M. Komajda. 1998. Genotype-phenotype correlations in familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A comparison between mutations in the cardiac protein-C and the β-myosin heavy chain genes. Eur. Heart J. 19:139-145.
4. Daehmlow, S., J. Erdmann, T. Knueppel, C. Gille, C. Froemmel, M. Hummel, R. Hetzer, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek. 2002. Novel mutations in sarcomeric protein genes in dilated cardiomyopathy. Biophys. Res. Comm. 298:116-120.
5. Flashman, E., C. Redwood, J. Moolman-Smook, and H. Watkins. 2004. Cardiac myosin binding protein C: its role in physiology and disease. Circ. Res. 94:1279-1289.
6. Moolman-Smook, J., E. Flashman, W. de Lange, Z. L. Li, V. Corfield, C. Redwood, and H. Watkins. 2002. Identification of novel interactions between domains of myosin binding protein-C that are modulated by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy missense mutations. Circ. Res. 91:704-711.
7. Kunst, G., K. R. Kress, M. Gruen, D. Uttenweiler, M. Gautel, and R. H. A. Fink. 2000. Myosin binding protein C, a phosphorylation- dependent force regulator in muscle that controls the attachment of myosin heads by its interaction with myosin S2. Circ. Res. 86:51-58.
8. Idowu, S. M., M. Gautel, S. J. Perkins, and M. Pfuhl. 2003. Structure, stability and dynamics of the central domain of cardiac myosin binding protein C (MyBP-C): implications for multidomain assembly and causes for cardiomyopathy. J. Mol. Biol. 329:745-761.
9. 2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 259: 15587-15596.
10. Morner, S., P. Richard, E. Kazzam, U. Hellman, B. Hainque, K. Schwartz, and A. Waldenstrom. 2003. Identification of the genotypes causing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in northern Sweden. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 35:841-849.
11. Riddle, D. S., V. P. Grantcharova, J. V. Santiago, E. Alm, I. Ruczinski, and D. Baker. 1999. Experiment and theory highlight role of native state topology in SH3 folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:1016-1024.
12. Chiti, F., N. Taddei, P. M. White, M. Bucciantini, F. Magherini, M. Stefani, and C. M. Dobson. 1999. Mutational analysis of acylphospha- tase suggests the importance of topology and contact order in protein folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:1005-1009.
13. Clementi, C., H. Nymeyer, and J. N. Onuchic. 2000. Topological and energetic factors: what determines the structural details of the transition state ensemble and "en-route" intermediates for protein folding? J.Mol. Biol. 298:937-953.
14. Cecconi, F., C. Micheletti, P. Carloni, and A. Maritan. 2001. The structural basis of antiviral drug resistance and role of folding pathways in HIV-1 protease. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 43:365-372.
15. Micheletti, C., F. Cecconi, A. Flammini, and A. Maritan. 2002. Crucial stages of protein folding through a solvable model: predicting target sites for enzyme-inhibiting drugs. Protein Sci. 11:1878-1887.
16. Hoang, T. X., and M. Cieplak. 2000. Sequencing of folding events in Go-type proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 113:8319-8328.
17. Cecconi, F., C. Guardiani, and R. Livi. 2006. Testing simplified protein models of the hPin1 WW domain. Biophys. J. 91:694-704.
18. Clarke, J., E. Cota, S. B. Fowler, and S. Hamill. 1999. Folding studies of immunoglobulin-like β-sandwich proteins suggest that they share a common folding pathway. Structure. 7:1145-1153.
19. Matysiak, S., and C. Clementi. 2004. Optimal combination of theory and experiment for the characterization of the protein folding landscape of S6: how far can a minimalist model go? J. Mol. Biol. 343:235-248.
20. Serrano, L., J. Kellis, P. Cann, A. Matouschek, and A. R. Fersht. 1992. The folding of an enzyme. II. Substructure of Barnase and the contribution of different interactions to protein stability. J. Mol. Biol. 224:783-804.
21. Kurochkina, N., and B. Lee. 1995. Hydrophobic potential by pairwise surface area sum. Protein Eng. 8:437-442.
22. Sung, S. 1999. Monte Carlo simulations of β-hairpin folding at constant temperature. Biophys. J. 76:164-175.
23. Zhou, H., and Y. Zhou. 2004. 2004. Quantifying the effect of burial of amino acid residues on protein stability. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 54:315-322.
24. Miyazawa, S., and R. L. Jernigan. 1985. Estimation of effective inter- residue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules. 18:534-552.
25. Cieplak, M., and J. I. Sulkowska. 2005. Thermal unfolding of proteins. J. Chem. Phys. 123:194908-1-4.
26. Caflisch, A., and M. Karplus. 1994. Molecular dynamics studies of protein and peptide folding and unfolding. In The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction. K. M. Merz Jr. and S. M. Le Grand, editors. Birkhauser, Boston.
27. Finkelstein, A. V. 1997. Can protein unfolding simulate protein folding? Protein Eng. 10:843-845.
28. Dinner, A. R., and M. Karplus. 1999. Is protein unfolding the reverse of protein folding? A lattice simulation analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 292:403419.
29. Stoycheva, A. D., C. L. Brooks III, and J. N. Onuchic. 2004. Gatekeepers in the ribosomal protein S6: thermodynamics, kinetics, and folding pathways revealed by a minimalist protein model. J. Mol. Biol. 340:571-585.
30. Humphrey, W., A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. 1996. VMD-visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14:33-38.
31. Sutto, L., G. Tiana, and R. A. Broglia. 2006. Sequence of events in folding mechanism: beyond the Gō model. Protein Sci. 15:1638-1652.
32. Guardiani, C., F. Cecconi, and R. Livi. 2007. Computational analysis of folding and mutation properties of C5 domain of myosin binding protein C. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. doi 10.1002/prot.21621.
33. Romero, P., Z. Obradovic, C. R. Kissinger, J. E. Villafranca, E. Garner, S. Guilliot, and A. K. Dunker. 1998. Thousands of proteins likely to have long disordered regions. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 3:437-448.
34. Uversky, V. N., J. R. Gillespie, and A. L. Fink. 2000. Why are ''natively unfolded'' proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 41:415-427.