Participatory assessment: Negotiating engagement in a technical communication program

Technical Communication

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 424-439

  Salvo, Michael J ^a   Ren, Jingfang ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949160020     PISSN: 00493155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, P. V. 1995. Evaluating technical communication programs: New stakeholders, diverse goals. Technical communication 42:628-33.
2. Bullinger, H.-J., J. Ziegler, and W. Bauer. 2002. Intuitive human-computer interaction - toward a user-friendly information society. International journal of human-computer interaction 14 (1):1-23.
3. Haraway, D. J. 1997. Modest_witness@second_millennium. femaleman©_meets_ oncoMouse™: Feminism and technoscience. New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Hart-Davidson, W. 2001. On writing, technical communication, and information technology: The core competencies of technical communication. Technical communication 48:145-155.
5. Iowa State University Extension. 2004. Methodology brief: Focus group fundamentals. Iowa State University, http://www.extension.iastate.edu/ publications/pm1969b.pdf.
6. Johnson, R. R. 2004. (Deeply) sustainable programs, sustainable cultures, sustainable selves. Strategies for professional status, vol. 2 of Power and legitimacy in technical communication, ed. Teresa Kynell-Hunt and Gerald Savage, 101-122. Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
7. Johnson-Eilola, J., and S. A. Selber. 2001. Sketching a framework for graduate education in technical communication. Technical communication quarterly 10:403-437.
8. Latour, B. 1999. Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Rickert, T., and M. J. Salvo. 2006. The distributed Gesamptkunstwerk: Sound, worlding, and new media culture. Computers and composition 23:296-316.
10. Salvo, M. J. 2001. Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical communication quarterly 10:773-790.
11. Scriven, M. 1966. The methodology of evaluation. Lafayette, IN: Social Science Education Consortium.
12. Selber, S. 2004. Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Serres, M. 1982. The parasite. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Spinuzzi, C. 2005. The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication 52:163-174.
15. Witte, S. P., and L. Faigley. 1983. Evaluating college writing programs. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Writing Program Administration Board of Consultant Evaluators. 1980. Writing program evaluation: An outline for self-study. Writing program administration 4:23-28.
17. Yates, J. 1989. Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.