David against Goliath? Group size and bystander effects in virtual knowledge sharing

Human Relations

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 271-295

  Voelpel, Sven C ^a,b   Eckhoff, Robert A ^b   F̈rster, Jens ^c  

^a WISE Research Group (For Wisdom Innovation Strategy Energy)

^b JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

^c Universiteit Van

Author keywords

Bystander effect; Group size; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Online communities; Quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949136478     PISSN: 00187267     EISSN: 1741282X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018726707087787     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Adrianson, L. & Hjelmquist, E. Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behavior & Information Technology, 1991, 10, 281 - 96.
2. Ardichvili, A., Page, V. & Wentling, T. Motivations and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2003, 7 (1). 64 - 77.
3. Argote, L., McEvily, B. & Reagons, R. Introduction to the special issue on managing knowledge in organizations: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Management Science, 2003, 49 (4). v-viii.
4. Barron, G. & Yechiam, E. Private e-mail requests and the diffusion of responsibility. Computers in Human Behavior, 2002, 18, 507 - 20.
5. Besanko, D., Dranove, D. & Shanley, M. The economics of strategy. New York: Wiley, 1996.
6. Bickman, L. The effect of another bystander's ability to help on bystander intervention in an emergency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7 (3). 367 - 79.
7. Briggs, N., Piliavin, J.A., Lorentzen, D. & Becker, G.A. On willingness to be a bone marrow donor. Transfusion, 1986, 26, 324 - 30.
8. Buckman, R. Building a knowledge driven organization. New York: McGraw Hill, 2004.
9. Cabrera,. & Cabrera, E. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 2002, 23 (5). 687 - 710.
10. Cialdini, R. Influence: Science and practice. Needham Heights, IL: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
11. Ciborra, C.U. & Patriota, G. Groupware and teamwork in R&D: Limits to learning and innovation. R&D Management, 1998, 28 (1). 1 - 10.
12. Darley, J.M. & Latan, B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 8 (4). 377 - 83.
13. Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
14. Davenport, T., Prusak, L. & Wilson, J. What's the big idea? Creating and capitalizing on the best new management thinking. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
15. Dovidio, E., Piliavin, J.A., Gaertner, S., Schroeder, D.A. & Clark, R.D. The arousal: Cost-reward model and the process of bystander intervention: A review of the evidence. In M.S. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial behavior. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1991, pp. 86 - 118.
16. Dubrovsky, V.J., Kiesler, S. & Sethna, B.N. The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 1991, 6, 119 - 46.
17. Fritzsche, B., Finkelstein, M. & Penner, L. To help or not to help: Capturing individuals' decision policies. Social Behavior and Personality, 2000, 28 (6). 561 - 78.
18. Garcia, S., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. & Darley, J. Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83 (4). 843 - 53.
19. Grandori, A. & Kogut, B. Dialogue on organization and knowledge. Organization Science, 2002, 13 (3). 224 - 31.
20. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N. & Tierney, T. What's your strategy for managing knowledge ? Harvard Business Review, 1999, 77 (2). 106 - 16.
21. Helfat, C. Guest editor's introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (10 / 11). 955 - 9.
22. Hudson, J. & Bruckman, A. The bystander effect: A lens for understanding patterns of participation. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2004, 13 (2). 165 - 95.
23. Hurley, D. & Allen, B.P. The effect of the number of people present in nonemergency situation. Journal of Social Psychology, 1974, 92, 27 - 9.
24. Huysman, M.H. & De Wit, D. Knowledge sharing in practice. Dordrecht / Boston, MA / Lancaster: Kluwer Academic, 2002.
25. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T.W. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 1984, 39, 1123 - 34.
26. Kulkarni, U.R., Ravindran, S. & Freeze, R. A knowledge management success model: Theoretical development and empirical validation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007, 23 (3). 309 - 47.
27. Latan, B. & Darley, J.M. The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
28. Latan, B. & Darley, J.M. Help in a crisis: Bystander response to an emergency. Morris-town, NJ: General Learning Press, 1976.
29. Latan, B. & Nida, S. Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89 (2). 308 - 24.
30. Latan, B., Williams, K.D. & Harkins, S. Many hands make light work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37 (6). 822 - 32.
31. Levin, P. & Isen, A. Further studies on the effect of feeling good on helping. Sociometry, 1975, 38 (1). 141 - 7.
32. Levy, P., Lundgren, D., Ansel, M., Fell, D., Fink, B. & McGrath, J.E. Bystander effect in demand-without-threat situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24 (2). 166 - 71.
33. Lewis, C., Thompson, L.F., Wuensch, K.L., Grossnickle, W. & Cope, J. The importance of recipient list size and priority signs on electronic helping behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 2004, 20, 633 - 44.
34. Mahnke, V. The economies of knowledge-sharing: Production and organization cost considerations Copenhagen Business School Working Paper, 1998.
35. Markey, P.M. Bystander intervention in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000, 16, 183 - 8.
36. Markus, M.L. Toward a 'critical mass' theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C.W. Steinfield (Eds), Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1990, pp. 194 - 218.
37. Marwell, G. & Ames, R.E. Experiments on the provision of public goods: I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. The American Journal of Sociology, 1979, 84, 1335 - 60.
38. Marwell, G. & Oliver, P. The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
39. McEvily, B., Das, S. & McCabe, K. Avoiding competence substitution through knowledge sharing. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25 (2). 294 - 311.
40. Miller, D. & Shamsie, J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (3). 519 - 43.
41. Misavage, R. & Richardson, J.T. The focusing of responsibility: An alternative hypothesis in help-demanding situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1974, 4 (1). 5 - 15.
42. Nonaka, I. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 1991, 69 (6). 96 - 104.
43. Nonaka, I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 1994, 5 (1). 14 - 38.
44. Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
45. Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G. & Voelpel, S. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 2006, 27 (8). 1179 - 208.
46. Ofek, E. & Sarvary, M. Leveraging the customer base: Creating competitive advantage through knowledge management. Management Science, 2001, 47 (11). 1441 - 56.
47. Oliver, P., Marwell, G. & Teixeira, R. A theory of critical mass: Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91, 522 - 56.
48. Orbell, J.M., Van de Kragt, A.J. & Dawes, R.M. Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54, 811 - 19.
49. Piliavin, J.A. & Callero, P.L. Giving blood: The development of an altruistic identity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
50. Piliavin, J.A., Dovidio, J.R., Gaertner, S.L. & Clark, R.D., III. Emergency intervention. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
51. Preece, J. Empathetic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting With Computers, 1999, 12, 63 - 77.
52. Preece, J. Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester: Wiley, 2000.
53. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D.T. & Lightdale, J.R. Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994, 20, 484 - 93.
54. Probst, G., Raub, S. & Romhardt, K. Managing knowledge: Building blocks for success. Chichester: Wiley, 2000.
55. Putnam, R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
56. Rosenthal, A.M. Thirty-eight witnesses: The Kitty Genovese case. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1964 / 1999.
57. Ross, A., Abraham, S. & Braband, J. Effect of increased responsibility on bystander intervention: II. The cue value of a blind person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25 (2). 254 - 8.
58. Sharratt, M. & Usoro, A. Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal on Knowledge Management, 2003, 1 (2). 187 - 96.
59. Smith, J.D. & Shaffer, D.R. Self-consciousness, self-reported altruism, and helping behaviour. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1986, 14, 215.
60. Spender, J. & Grant, R. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17, 5 - 9.
61. Straus, S.G. & McGrath, J.E. Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, 79, 87 - 97.
62. Swan, J. & Scarbrough, H. Case studies in knowledge management. London: Chartered Institute for Personnel & Development, 1999.
63. Szulanski, G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, 17, 27 - 43.
64. Tiwana, A. Knowledge management toolkit: The practical techniques for building a knowledge management system Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
65. Toi, M. & Batson, C.D. More evidence that empathy is a source of altruistic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 281 - 92.
66. Voelpel, S. The mobile company: An advanced organizational model for accelerating knowledge, innovation and value creation. St Gallen, Switzerland: IFPM, 2003.
67. Voelpel, S. & Davenport, T. Siemens takes four steps - Establishment of a global knowledge sharing system. Harvard Business Review (China), 2004, 3 (9). 128 - 37.
68. Voelpel, S. & Han, Z. Managing knowledge sharing in China: The case of Siemens ShareNet. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2005, 9 (3). 51 - 63.
69. Voelpel, S., Dous, M. & Davenport, T. Five steps to creating a global knowledge-sharing system: Siemens Share-Net. Academy of Management Executive, 2005, 19 (2). 9 - 32.
70. Von Krogh, G. The communal resource and information systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2002, 11, 85 - 107.
71. Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. & Nonaka, I. Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
72. Williams, K., Harkins, S.G. & Latan, B. Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 303 - 11.
73. Yechiam, E. & Barron, G. Learning to ignore online help requests. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 2003, 9, 327 - 39.