Effect of age on clinical and radiographic outcomes and adverse events following 1-level lumbar arthroplasty after a minimum 2-year follow-up

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 101-107

  Guyer, Richard D ^a   Geisler, Fred H ^b   Blumenthal, Scott L ^a   McAfee, Paul C ^c   Mullin, Bradford B ^d  

^a TEXAS BACK INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Illinois Neuro Spine Center   (United States)

^c St Joseph's Hospital   (United States)

^d Mount Carmel East Hospital Campus ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Age effect; Arthroplasty; Investigational Device Exemption clinical trial; Patient selection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BURNING FEET SYNDROME; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL STUDY; COMORBIDITY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE RELATED INJURY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DURA MATER TEAR; EPIDURAL HEMATOMA; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION STUDY; LEG PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; NERVE ROOT INJURY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OPERATION DURATION; OSTEOPENIA; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROGNOSIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROGRADE EJACULATION; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE SURGERY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VEIN INJURY; VEIN THROMBOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DEVICE APPROVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SPINAL DISEASES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38949134583     PISSN: 15475654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/2/101     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Blumenthal SL, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, et al: Aprospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ(TM) artificial disc versus lumbar fusion part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565-1575, 2005
2. Buttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H: [An alternative treatment strategy in lumbar intervertebral disk damage using an SB Charité modular type intervertebral disk endoprosthesis.] Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 125:1-6, 1987
3. David T: Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients. Spine 32:661-666, 2007
4. Geisler FH: Surgical technique of lumbar artificial disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc. Neurosurgery 56 (1 Suppl): 46-57, 2005
5. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, et al: Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143-154, 2004
6. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, Ahern JW, Dowdle JD: The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion. History, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective, multicenter trial. Spine 23:1267-1279, 1998
7. Lehto MU, Honkanen P: Factors influencing the outcome of operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 137:25-28, 1995
8. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el-H, Skalli W, Lavaste F: Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord 18:353-359, 2005
9. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Bullis D, Betz RR, Baldus C, Schoenecker PL: Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord 5:433-442, 1992
10. Mayer T, Gatchel RJ, Evans T: Effect of age on outcomes of tertiary rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders. Spine 26:1378-1384, 2001
11. McAfee PC, Boden SD, Brantigan JW, Fraser RD, Kuslich SD, Oxland TR, et al: Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions. Spine 26:320-334, 2001
12. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple GA, Adams KA, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583, 2005
13. Naderi S, Ozgen S, Pamir MN, Ozek MM, Erzen C: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting prognosis. Neurosurgery 43:43-50, 1998
14. Raffo CS, Lauerman WC: Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade. Spine 31:99-103, 2006
15. Rinella A, Bridwell K, Kim Y, Rudzki J, Edwards C, Roh M, et al: Late complications of adult idiopathic scoliosis primary fusions to L4 and above: the effect of age and distal fusion level. Spine 29:318-325, 2004
16. Upadhyay SS, Saji MJ, Sell P, Hsu LC, Yau AC: The effect of age on the change in deformity after anterior debridement surgery for tuberculosis of the spine. Spine 21:2356-2362, 1996