Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: Evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes

International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 143-150

  IJsselmuiden, A J J ^b   Tangelder, G J ^b   Cotton, J M ^b   Vaijifdar, B ^b   Kiemeneij, F ^b   Slagboom, T ^b   Vd Wieken, R ^b   Serruys, P W ^b   Laarman, G J ^a  

^a ONZE LIEVE VROUWE GASTHUIS   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coronary intervention; Direct stenting; Ischemic heart disease; Percutaneous coronary intervervention (PCI); Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; CORONARY STENT; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESTENOSIS; REVIEW; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); STENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0141427717     PISSN: 14628848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14628840310017807     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Windeckers S, Meyer BJ, Bonzel T, et al. Interventional cardiology in Europe 1994. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 40-54.
2. Leon MB, Popma JJ, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM. An overview of US coronary stent trials. Semin Intervent Cardiol 1996; 1: 247-54.
3. Belli G, Ellis SG, Topol EJ. Stenting for ischemic heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1997; 40: 159-82.
4. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al, Benestent Study Group. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-95.
5. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. Stent Restenosis Study I. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
6. Suwaidi JA, Berger PB, Holmes DR. Coronary artery stents. Clin Cardiol 2000; 284: 1828-34.
7. Figulla HR, Mudra H, Reifart N, Werner GS. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation: a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 43: 245-52; discussion 253.
8. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Hoop dreams: stents without restenosis. Circulation 1996; 6: 1199-202.
9. Rogers C, Parikh S, Seifert P, Edelman ER. Endogenous cell seeding: remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996; 94: 2909-14.
10. Rogers C, Edelman ER. Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 2995-3001.
11. Wong SC, Baim DS, Schatz RA, et al, Palmaz-Schatz Stent Study Group. Immediate results and late outcomes after stent implantation in saphenous vein graft lesions: the multicenter US Palmaz-Schatz stent experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 704-12.
12. Holmes DR, Jr. Technical aspects. In: Vliestra RE HDJ, eds, Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis 1987: 35-48.
13. Wong P, Wong C, Cheng C, et al. Early clinical experience with the Multi-Link coronary stent. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39: 413-19.
14. Carozza JP, Hermiller JB, Linnemeier TJ, et al. Quantitative coronary angiographic and intravascular ultrasound assessment of a new nonarticulated stent: report from the advanced cardiovascular systems Multilink stent pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 50-56.
15. Oemsrawsingh PV, Schalij MJ, Srimahachota S, Jukema JW, Bruscheke AV. Clinical and angiographic outcome of stent implantation without predilatation using the Jostent Flex stent. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 187-93.
16. Ormiston JA, Ruygrok PN, Webster MWI, et al. Mechanical properties of five long stents compared. J Invas Cardiol 1998; 10: 35A.
17. Hoffmann M, Werner GS, Ferrari M, Richartz BM, Figulla HR. Direct coronary stent implantation without predilatation - a new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design. Z Kardiol 1999; 88: 123-32.
18. Danzi GB, Capuano C, Fiocca L, et al. Stent implantation without predilatation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 1250-53: A8.
19. Ormiston JA, Webster MWI, Ruygrok PN, et al, on behalf of the NIR Future Trial Investigators. A randomized study of direct coronary stent delivery compared with stenting after predilatation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50: 377-81.
20. Chevalier B. Select Lesion Indication for Direct Stenting (SLIDE). Presentation during the Guidant Symposium at the Paris Course on Revascularization, 26 May 2000: (www.directstent.org) (abstr).
21. Baim DS, Flatley M, Caputo R et al. Comparison of PRE-Dilatation vs. Direct Stenting In Coronary Treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 1364-69.
22. Carrié D, Khalifé K, Citron B, et al. Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilation in patients with stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 693-98.
23. Laarman GJ, Muthusamy TS, Swart H, et al. Direct coronary stent implantation. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50: 443-48.
24. Pentoussis D, Guerin Y, Funck F, et al. Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the Multilink stent. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1437-40.
25. Veselka J, Tesar D, Mates M, et al. Treatment of significant coronary stenoses using stents without preliminary balloon angioplasty: present status, results, perspectives. Vnitr Lek 1998; 44: 693-97.
26. Hernandez JM, Riesco Riesco JF, Rodriguez Entem F, Figueroa Olabarria A, Zueco Gil J, Colman T. A direct stent without predilatation. Our experience in 300 lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 1999; 52: 301-10.
27. Herz I, Assali A, Solodky A, et al. Effectiveness of coronary stent deployment without predilatation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 89-91: A8.
28. Hamon M, Richardeau Y, Lecluse E, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation in acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 1999; 138: 55-59.
29. Brigouri C, Sheiban I, De Gregorio J, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1910-15.
30. Chan AW, Carere RG, Solankhi N, Dodek A, Webb JG. Coronary stenting without predilatation in a broad spectrum of clinical and angiographic situations. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 75-79.
31. Wilson SH, Berger BP, Mathew V, et al. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 937-43.
32. Herz I, Assali A, Solodky A, et al. Coronary stent deployment without predilatation in acute myocardial infarction: a feasible, safe and effective technique. Angiology 1999; 50: 901-908.
33. Herz I, Assali A, Solodky A, et al. Coronary stenting without predilatation (SWOP): applicable technique in every day practice. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 49: 384-88.
34. Hernandez JM, Gomez I, Rodriguez-Entem F, Zueco J, Figueroa A, Colman T. Evaluation of direct stent implantation without predilatation by intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 2000; 85: 1028-30: A8.
35. Veselka J, Mates M, Tesar DB, Aschermann M, Urbanova T, Honek T. Direct stenting without predilatation: a new approach to coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis 2000; 11: 503-507.
36. Medina A, Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, et al. Primary stent treatment in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Rev Esp Cardiol 1997; 50: 63-68.
37. Bolte J, Diefenbach C, von Olshausen K. Coronary stent implantation without preliminary dilatation. Z Kardiol 1999; 87: 707-14.
38. Taylor AJ, Broughton A, Federman J, et al. Efficacy and safety of direct stenting in coronary angioplasty. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 560-65.
39. Hernandez JM, Gomez Consalez, Rodriquez entem F, et al. Intravascular ultrasonographic evaluation of direct stents implanted without predilatation. Comparison of results according to lesion types. Rev Esp Cardiol 2000; 53: 1335-41.
40. Herz I, Assali A, Adler A, et al. Coronary stent deployment without predilatation: prevention of complications of venous graft angioplasty. Angiology 1998; 49: 613-17.
41. Serruys PW, Hout B, Bonnier H, et al. Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II). Lancet 1998; 352: 673-81.
42. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assesment of the mechanisms and predictors of restenosis following coronary angioplasty. J Invas Cardiol 1997; 9: 303-14.
43. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Hong MK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound to discern device-specific effects and mechanisms of restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 18-22.
44. Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Baim DS. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 15-25.
45. Schwartz RS, Huber KG, Murphy JG, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 267-74.
46. Rogers C, Karnovsky MJ, Edelman ER. Inhibition of experimental neointimal hyperplasia and thrombosis depends on the type of vascular injury and the site of drug administration. Circulation 1993; 88: 1215-21.
47. Bonan R, Paiement P, Scortichini D, Cloutier MJ, Leung TK. Coronary restenosis in a swine model: evaluation of restenosis injury index. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1334-40.
48. Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KKL, et al. Economics of elective coronary revascularization: comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1052-59.
49. Cohen DJ, Breall JA, Ho KKL, et al. Evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of stenting as a treatment for symptomatic single vessel coronary disease: use of a decision-analytic model. Circulation 1994; 89: 1859-74.
50. Cotton JM, Kearney MT, Wainwright RJ. Shifting the balance: direct stenting, a novel approach to improve the cost effectiveness of intra-coronary stenting. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 170.