Composite behavior of hybrid FRP-concrete bridge decks on steel girders

Composite Structures

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-43

  Alnahhal, Wael ^a   Aref, Amjad ^b   Alampalli, Sreenivas ^c  

^a CH2M HILL   (United States)

^b State University of New York   (United States)

^c U S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge deck; Composite structures; Concrete; Effective flange width; Finite element analysis; FRP composites

Indexed keywords

BENDING STRENGTH; COMPOSITE BRIDGES; CONCRETE BRIDGES; FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STEEL BRIDGES;

EFFECTIVE FLANGE WIDTH; FLEXURAL LOADING; STEEL GIRDERS;

BRIDGE DECKS;

BRIDGE; CONCRETE; FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; LOADING (TESTING); STEEL;

EID: 38949119770     PISSN: 02638223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 2nd ed. (1998), AASHTO, Washington (DC)
2. Alnahhal WI. Structural characteristics and failure prediction of hybrid FRP-concrete bridge superstructure and deck systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo; 2007.
3. Alnahhal W., Chiewanichakorn M., Aref A., and Alampalli S. Temporal thermal behavior and damage simulations of FRP deck. J Bridge Eng, ASCE 11 4 (2006) 452-465
4. Aref A.J., Chiewanichakorn M., Chen S.S., and Ahn I.-S. Effective width definitions for negative moment regions of composite bridges. J Bridge Eng, ASCE 12 3 (2007) 339-349
5. Aref AJ. A novel fiber reinforced composite bridge structural system. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign; 1997.
6. Ashby M.F. Overview no. 92-materials and shape. Acta Metallur Mater 39 6 (1991) 1025-1039
7. Bakeri PA, Sunder SS. Concepts for hybrid FRP bridge deck systems, serviceability and durability of construction materials. In: Proceedings of the first materials engineering congress, vol. 2. Denver, Colorado: ASCE; August 13-15, 1990. p. 1006-15.
8. In: Busel J.P. (Ed). Product selection guide: FRP composite products for bridge applications. 1st ed. (2000), The Market Development Alliance of the FRP Composites Industry, Harrison (NY)
9. Chen S.S., Aref A.J., Chiewanichakorn M., and Ahn I.-S. Development of effective flange width design criteria. J Bridge Eng, ASCE 12 3 (2007) 325-338
10. Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration. Status of the nation's highways, bridges and transit: conditions and performance-report to congress, 2003. [October 03. 03].
11. Elkelish S., and Robinson H. Effective widths of composite beams with ribbed metal deck. Can J Civil Eng 13 5 (1986) 575-582
12. Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. ABAQUS/standard user's manual, version 6.3. Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc.; 2002.
13. Keelor D.C., Luo V., Earls C.J., and Yulismana W. Service load effective compression flange width in FRP deck systems acting compositely with steel stringers. J Compos Construct, Am Soc Civil Eng 8 4 (2004) 289-297
14. Keller T., and Gurtler H. Quasi-static and fatigue performance of a cellular FRP bridge deck adhesively bonded to steel girders. Compos Struct 70 4 (2005) 484-496
15. Keller T., and Gurtler H. Composite action and adhesive bond between fiber-reinforced polymer bridge decks and main girders. J Compos Construct 9 4 (2005) 360-368
16. Kim H., Hwang Y., Park K., Lee Y., and Kim S. Fiber reinforced plastic deck profile for I-girder bridges. Compos Struct 67 4 (2005) 411-416
17. Kitane Y., and Aref A. Static and fatigue testing of hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer-concrete bridge superstructure. J Compos Construct 8 2 (2004) 182-190
18. Lesko J.J., Hayes M.D., Schniepp T.J., and Case S.W. Characterization and durability of FRP structural shapes and materials. Compos Construct: A Real (2001) 110-120
19. Market Development Alliance of the FRP Composites Industry. Industry overview: overview of the FRP composites industry-a historical perspective. Market Development Alliance of the FRP Composites Industry, 2002. [Dec.03.02].
20. Meggers D. Fiber reinforced polymer bridge decks-The Kansas experience. Rep. Prepared for the Kansas Department of Transportation (CD-ROM), Topeka, Kan, 2000.
21. Mirmiran A., Shahawy M., and Beitleman T. Slenderness limit for hybrid FRP-concrete columns. J Compos Construct 5 1 (2001) 26-34
22. Moffatt K.R., and Dowling P.J. British shear lag rules for composite girders. J Struct Eng 104 7 (1978) 1123-1130
23. Moon FL., Eckel DA., and Gillespie JW. Shear stud connection for the development of composite action between steel girders and fiber reinforced polymer bridge decks. J Struct Eng 128 6 (2002) 762-770
24. Park KT, Hwang HY, Kim HY, Lee YH, Kim SM. Deck-to-Girder Connections for GFRP Bridge Decks. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on the advanced composite materials in bridges and structures. Calgary, Alberta; July 20-23, 2004. Montreal: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. p. 9.
25. Reising R., Shahrooz B., Hunt V., Neumann A., Helmicki A., and Hastak M. Close look at construction issues and performance of four fiber-reinforced polymer composite bridge decks. J Compos Construct 8 1 (2004) 33-42
26. Righman J., Barth K., and Davalos J. Development of an efficient connector system for fiber reinforced polymer bridge decks to steel girders. J Compos Construct 8 4 (2004) 279-288
27. Seible F, Karbhari VM, Burgueño R, Seaberg E. Modular advanced composite bridge systems for short and medium span bridges. Developments in short and medium span bridge engineering '98. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on short and medium span bridges. Canadian Society of Civil Engineers: Calgary (Canada), CD-ROM; 1998. p. 431-41.
28. Zetterberg T., Astrom B.T., Backund J., and Burman M. On design of joints between composite profiles for bridge deck applications. Compos Struct 51 (2001) 83-91
29. Zhou A., and Keller T. Joining techniques for fiber reinforced polymer composite bridge deck systems. Compos Struct 69 3 (2005) 336-345