Scientists' perceptions of the social and political implications of their research

Scientometrics

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 207-221

  Small, Henry ^a   Kushmerick, Ann ^a   Benson, Doug ^a  

^a THOMSON SCIENTIFIC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38949112919     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-0213-1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Barns, I. J., Wilson, S. A. (1996). Scientists and the broader community. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 6(2-3): 142-148.
2. Bernal, J.D. (1965), Science in History, Vol. 3, The Natural Sciences in Our Time. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
3. Brooks, H. (1968), Government of Science. (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), Chapter 3.
4. Cohen, J. (1968), Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scale disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70: 213-220.
5. Corrado, M., Pooni, K., Hartfree, Y. (2000), Role of Scientists in Public Debate. Report for the Wellcome Trust by Market and Opinion Research International (MORI). (London: The Wellcome Trust).
6. Garfield, E. (1981), Citation Classics: four years of the human side of science. Current Contents, 22 (1 June 1981): 5-16. Reprinted in: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 5 (Philadelphia: ISI Press), pp. 123-134.
7. Murphy, K., Topel, R. (2003), Diminishing returns? The costs and benefits of improving health. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3): S108-S128.
8. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., Olivastro, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3): 317-330.
9. National Science Board (1993), Science & Engineering Indicators - 1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Chapter 7.
10. Perreault, W. D., Leigh, L. E. (1989), Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(2): 135-148.
11. Price, D. J. De Solla (1976), Extrinsic value theory for basic and applied research. Policy Studies Journal, 5(2): 160-168.
12. Small, H. (2004), Why authors think their papers are highly cited. Scientometrics, 60(3): 305-316.
13. Small, H. (2006), Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3): 595-610.
14. Weinberg, A. M. (1963), Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva, 1(2): 159-171.