The impact of haptic learning in telemanipulator-assisted surgery

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 402-406

  Jacobs, Stephan ^a   Holzhey, David ^a   Strauss, Gero ^b   Burgert, Oliver ^c   Falk, Volkmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery ICCAS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Learning curve; Surgical training; Telemanipulator assisted surgery

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TELEMANIPULATOR; TELEMANIPULATOR ASSISTED SURGERY; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS; SURGERY; TELEMETRY; VIDEORECORDING;

EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, STRUCTURAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SURGERY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TELEMETRY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 38849183568     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180f60c23     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hashizume M, Konishi K, Tsutsumi N, et al. A new era of robotic surgery assisted by computer-enhanced surgical system. Surgery. 2002;131:s330.
2. Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:54.
3. Feygin D, Keehner M, Tendick F. Haptic Guidance: Experimental Evaluation of a Haptic Training Method for a Perceptual Motor Skill. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, part of IEEE Virtual Reality. Orlando, FL, 2002:40-47.
4. Gillespie RB, O'Modhrain S, Tang P, et al. "The Virtual Teacher," ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition. Anaheim, CA; 1998.
5. O'Malley MK, Gupta A, Gen M, et al. Shared control in haptic systems for performance, enhancement and training. J Dynamic Syst, Measure Control. 2006;128:75-85.
6. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. Total endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg. 2000;17:38-45.
7. Moore MJ, Bennett CL. The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg. 1995;170:55-59.
8. Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, et al. Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:217-222.
9. Verner L, Oleynikov D, Holtmann S, et al. Measurements of the level of surgical expertise using flight path analysis from da Vinci(TM) Robotic surgical system. Med Meets Virtual Reality. 2003;11:373-378.
10. Rosen J, Hannaford B, Richards C, et al. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001;48:579-591.
11. Rosen J, Solazzo M, Hannaford B, et al. Objective evaluation of laparoscopic skills based on haptic information and tool/tissue interactions. Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7:49-61.
12. Payandeh S, Lomax AJ, Dill J, et al. On defining metrics for assessing laparoscopic surgical skills in a virtual training environment. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: 10. Newport Beach, CA, 2002.
13. Szabo Z, Hunter J, Berci G, et al. Analysis of surgical movements during suturing in laparoscopy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994;2:55-61; discussion 463-464.
14. Falk V, McLoughlin J, Guthart G, et al. Dexterity enhancement in endoscopic surgery by a computer-controlled mechanical wrist. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol. 1999;8:235-242.
15. Falk V, Mintz D, Grünenfelder J, et al. Influence of three-dimensional vision on surgical telemanipulator performance. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1282-1288.
16. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458-463; discussion 463-464.
17. Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:549-554.
18. Strayer MP, Krause KR, Dalstrom DJ, et al. Computer Enhanced Robotic Telesurgery Versus Standard Laparoscopy: Performance on a Skills Test (Abstract). St Louis, MO: Annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES); 2001.
19. Buchmann P, Dinçler S. Learning curve-calculation and value in laparoscopic surgery; Therapeutische Umschau, Seite 2005:69-75, Band 62 Heft 2 © Verlag Hans Huber, Bern.
20. Chitwood WR, Nifong LW, Chapman WHH, et al. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg. 2001;234:475-484; discussion 484-486.
21. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, et al. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg. 1998;133:957-961.
22. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson M. In human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 1999.