Apparent mutational hotspots and long distance linkage disequilibrium resulting from a bottleneck

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 541-550

  Tenaillon, M I ^a,b   Austerlitz, F ^c   Tenaillon, O ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^d INSERM   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Coalescence; Demography; Polymorphism aggregation; Recombination

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; APPARENT COMPETITION; DEMOGRAPHY; MUTATION; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION BOTTLENECK;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; MUTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 38849164368     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01490.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, A.M. Hudson, R.R. 2004. Maximum-likelihood estimation of demographic parameters using the frequency spectrum of unlinked single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Genetics 168 : 1699 1712.
2. Andolfatto, P. 2005. Adaptative evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila. Nature 437 : 1149 1152.
3. Andolfatto, P. Przeworski, M. 2000. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics 156 : 257 268.
4. Andolfatto, P. Przeworski, M. 2001. Regions of lower crossing over harbour more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158 : 657 665.
5. Aquadro, C.F., Bauer DuMont, V. Reed, F.A. 2001. Genome-wide variation in the human and fruitfly: a comparison. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11 : 627 634.
6. Bachtrog, D. Andolfatto, P. 2006. Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 174 : 2045 2059.
7. Baudry, E., Kerdelhue, C., Innan, H. Stephan, W. 2001. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158 : 1725 1735.
8. Dooner, H.K. Martinez-Ferez, I.M. 1997. Recombination occurs uniformly within the bronze gene, a meiotic recombination hotspot in the maize genome. Plant Cell 9 : 1633 1646.
9. Fay, J.C. Benavides, J.A. 2005. Hypervariable noncoding sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170 : 1575 1587.
10. Fay, J.C. Wu, C.I. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155 : 1405 1413.
11. Frisse, L., Hudson, R.R., Bartoszewicz, A., Wall, J.D., Donfack, J. Di Rienzo, A. 2001. Gene conversion and different population histories may explain the contrast between polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium levels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69 : 831 843.
12. Fu, Y.-X. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics 147 : 915 925.
13. Fu, Y.-X. Li, W.-H. 1993. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133 : 693 709.
14. Fu, H., Zheng, Z. Dooner, H.K. 2002. Recombination rates between adjacent genic and retrotransposon regions in maize vary by 2 orders of magnitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 99 : 1082 1087.
15. Goss, P.J.E. Lewontin, R.C. 1996. Detecting heterogeneity of substitution along DNA and protein sequences. Genetics 143 : 589 602.
16. Haag-Liautard, C., Dorris, M., Maside, X., Macaskill, S., Halligan, D.L., Charlesworth, B. Keightley, P. 2007. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445 : 82 85.
17. Haddrill, P.R., Thornton, K.R., Charlesworth, B. Andolfatto, P. 2005. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genome Res. 15 : 790 799.
18. Harding, R.M. McVean, G. 2004. A structured ancestral population for the evolution of modern humans. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14 : 667 674.
19. Hellmann, I., Ebersberger, I., Ptak, S.E., Paabo, S. Przeworski, M. 2003. A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72 : 1527 1535.
20. Hellmann, I., Prufer, K., Ji, H., Zody, M.C., Paabo, S. Ptak, S.E. 2005. Why do human diversity levels vary at a megabase scale? Genome Res. 15 : 1222 1231.
21. Hill, W.G. Robertson, A. 1968. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 38 : 226 231.
22. Hill, W.G. Weir, B.S. 1994. Maximum-likelihood estimation of gene location by linkage disequilibrium. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 54 : 705 714.
23. Hoede, C., Denamur, E. Tenaillon, O. 2006. Selection acts on DNA secondary structures to decrease transcriptional mutagenesis. PLoS Genet. 2 : 1697 1701.
24. Hudson, R.R. 1983. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 23 : 183 201.
25. Hudson, R.R. 2003. Linkage disequilibrium and recombination. In : Handbook of Statistical Genetics (D. J. Balding, M. Bishop C. Cannings, eds pp. 662 680. John Wiley & Sons, Sussex.
26. Hudson, R.R. Kaplan, N.L. 1985. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111 : 147 164.
27. Hwang, D.G. Green, P. 2004. Bayesian markov chain monte carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 101 : 13994 14001.
28. Karlin, S. Taylor, H.M. 1981. A Second Course in Stochastic Processes. Academic press, New York.
29. Lercher, M.J. Hurst, L.D. 2002. Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination. Trends Genet. 18 : 337 340.
30. Li, N. Stephens, M. 2003. Modelling linkage disequilibrium and identifying recombination hotspots using single-nucleotide polymorphism data. Genetics 165 : 2213 2233.
31. Marth, G., Schuler, G., Yeh, R., Davenport, R., Agarwala, R., Church, D., Wheelan, S., Baker, J., Ward, M., Kholodov, M., Phan, L., Czabarka, E., Murvai, J., Cutler, D., Wooding, S., Rogers, A., Chakravarti, A., Harpending, H.C., Kwok, P.Y.R., Sherry, S.T. 2003. Sequence variations in the public human genome data reflect a bottlenecked population history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 100 : 376 381.
32. McVean, G. 2002. A genealogical interpretation of linkage disequilibrium. Genetics 162 : 987 991.
33. Nachman, M.W. 2001. Single nucleotide polymorphisms and recombination in humans. Trends Genet. 17 : 481 485.
34. Payseur, B.A. Nachman, M.W. 2002. Gene density and human nucleotide polymorphism. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19 : 336 340.
35. Petes, T.D. 2001. Meiotic recombination hot spots and cold spots. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 : 360 369.
36. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. Vetterling, W.T. 1992. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Przeworski, M., Hudson, R.R. Di Rienzo, A. 2000. Adjusting the focus on human variation. Trends Genet. 16 : 296 302.
38. Reich, D.E., Shaffner, S.F., Daly, M.J., McVean, G., Mullikin, J.C., Higgins, J.M., Richter, D.J., Lander, E.S. Altshuler, D. 2002. Human genome sequence variation and the influence of gene history, mutation and recombination. Nat. Genet. 32 : 135 142.
39. Sachidanandam, R., Weissman, D., Schmidt, S.C., Kakol, J.M., Stein, L.D., Marth, G., Sherry, S., Mullikin, J.C., Mortimore, B.J., Willey, D.L., Hunt, S.E., Cole, C.G., Coggill, P.C., Rice, C.M., Ning, Z., Rogers, J., Bentley, D.R., Kwok, P.Y., Mardis, E.R., Yeh, R.T., Schultz, B., Cook, L., Davenport, R., Dante, M., Fulton, L., Hillier, L., Waterston, R.H., McPherson, J.D., Gilman, B., Schaffner, S., Van Etten, W.J., Reich, D., Higgins, J.M., Daly, M.J., Blumenstiel, B., Baldwin, J., Stange-Thomann, N., Zody, M.C., Linton, L., Lander, E.S. Altshuler, D. 2001. A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 409 : 928 933.
40. Surralles, J., Ramirez, M.J., Marcos, R., Natarajan, A.T. Mullenders, L.H. 2002. Clusters of transcription-coupled repair in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99 : 10572 10574.
41. Tajima, F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123 : 585 595.
42. Tenaillon, M.I., Sawkins, M.C., Long, A.D., Gaut, R.L., Doebley, J.F. Gaut, B.S. 2001. Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp mays L.). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98 : 9161 9166.
43. Tenaillon, M.I., Sawkins, M.C., Anderson, L.K., Stack, S.M., Doebley, J. Gaut, B.S. 2002. Patterns of diversity and recombination along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.). Genetics 162 : 1401 1413.
44. Tenaillon, M.I., U'Ren, J., Tenaillon, O. Gaut, B.S. 2004. Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 : 1214 1225.
45. Thornton, K. Andolfatto, P. 2006. Approximate bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe bottleneck in a Netherlands population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172 : 1607 1619.
46. Voight, B.F., Adams, A.M., Frisse, L.A., Qian, Y., Hudson, R.R. Di Rienzo, A. 2005. Interrogating multiple aspects of variation in a full resequencing data set to infer human population size changes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 : 18508 18513.
47. Wall, J.D., Andolfatto, P. Przeworski, M. 2002. Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 162 : 203 216.
48. Wang, N., Akey, J.M., Zhang, K., Chakraborty, R. Jin, L. 2002. Distribution of recombination crossovers and the origin of haplotype blocks: the interplay of population history, recombination and mutation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71 : 1227 1234.
49. Wolfe, K.H., Sharp, P.M. Li, W.-H. 1989. Mutations differ among regions of the mammalian genome. Nature 337 : 283 285.
50. Wright, S.I., Bi, I.V., Schroeder, S.G., Yamasaki, M., Doebley, J.F., McMullen, M.D. Gaut, B.S. 2005. The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308 : 1310 1314.
51. Yamasaki, M., Tenaillon, M.I., Bi, I.V., Schroeder, S.G., Sanchez-Villeda, H., Doebley, J.F., Gaut, B.S. McMullen, M.D. 2005. A large-scale screen for artificial selection in maize identifies candidate agronomic loci for domestication and crop improvement. Plant Cell 17 : 2859 2872.