Correlated evolution between male ejaculate allocation and female remating behaviour in seed beetles (Bruchidae)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 471-479

  Katvala, M ^a   Ronn J L ^a   Arnqvist, G ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Accessory gland products; Callosobruchus; Coevolution; Mating system; Nuptial gifts; Polyandry; Sexual selection; Sperm allocation; Sperm competition; Zabrotes

Indexed keywords

BEETLE; COEVOLUTION; MATING BEHAVIOR; MATING SUCCESS; NUPTIAL GIFT; PHYLOGENETICS; POLYANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EJACULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TESTIS;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; EJACULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; TESTIS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

BRUCHINAE; CALLOSOBRUCHUS; COLEOPTERA; ZABROTES;

EID: 38849146526     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01494.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393 : 784 786.
2. Arnqvist, G. Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Arnqvist, G., Nilsson, T. Katvala, M. 2005. Mating rate and fitness in female bean weevils. Behav. Ecol. 16 : 123 127.
4. Autumn, K., Ryan, M.J. Wake, D.B. 2002. Integrating historical and mechanistic biology enhances the study of adaptation. Q. Rev. Biol. 77 : 383 408.
5. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E. Welsch, R.E. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley, New York.
6. Birkhead, T.R. Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.
7. Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57 : 717 745.
8. Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76 : 305 339.
9. Boshra, S.A. 1994. Effects of gamma radiation on reproduction, mating competitiveness and sperm activity of Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Qatar Univ. Sci. J. 14 : 298 302.
10. Brennan, P.L.R., Prum, R.O., McCracken, K.G., Sorenson, M.D., Wilson, R.E. Birkhead, T.R. 2007. Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in water fowl. PLoS ONE 5 : e418.
11. Briskie, J.V. Montgomerie, V.R. 1993. Patterns of sperm storage in relation to sperm competition in passerine birds. Condor 95 : 442 454.
12. Briskie, J.V., Montgomerie, V.R. Birkhead, T.R. 1997. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51 : 937 945.
13. Carvalho, P., Felizola Diniz-Filho, J.A. Bini, L.M. 2006. Factors influencing changes in trait correlations across species after using phylogenetic independent contrasts. Evol. Ecol. 20 : 591 602.
14. Dewsbury, D.A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119 : 601 610.
15. Dybas, L.K. Dybas, H.S. 1981. Coadaptation and taxonomic differentiation of sperm and spermathecae in featherwing beetles. Evolution 35 : 168 174.
16. Eady, P. 1991. Sperm competition in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): a comparison of two methods used to estimate paternity. Ecol. Entomol. 16 : 45 53.
17. Eady, P. 1995. Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus inseminate so many sperm? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36 : 25 32.
18. Edvardsson, M. 2007. Female Callosobruchus maculatus mate when they are thirsty: resource-rich ejaculates as mating effort in a beetle. Anim. Behav. 74 : 183 188.
19. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 : 1 15.
20. Felsenstein, J. 2005. Phylip (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.6. Distributed by the author at http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip. html. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
21. Fox, C.W. 1993. Multiple mating, lifetime fecundity and female mortality of the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol. 7 : 203 208.
22. Gage, M.J.G. 1994. Associations between body size, mating pattern, testis size and sperm lengths across butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 : 97 103.
23. Gage, M.J.G. 1995. Continuous variation in reproductive strategy as an adaptive response to population density in the moth Plodia interpunctella. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 261 : 25 30.
24. Galvani, A. Johnstone, R. 1998. Sperm allocation in an uncertain world. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44 : 161 168.
25. Garland, T., Harvey, P.H. Ives, A.R. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41 : 18 32.
26. Harvey, P.H. Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
27. Hosken, D.J. Ward, P.I. 2001. Experimental evidence for testes size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol. Lett. 4 : 10 13.
28. Ilango, K. Lane, R.P. 2000. Coadaptation of male aedeagal filaments and female spermathecal ducts of the old world Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). J. Med. Entomol. 37 : 653 659.
29. Karlsson, B. 1995. Resource allocation and mating strategies in butterflies. Evolution 49 : 955 961.
30. Koene, J.M. Schulenburg, H. 2003. Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails. BMC Evol. Biol. 5 : 25.
31. Losos, J.B. 1999. Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods. Anim. Behav. 58 : 1319 1324.
32. Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall, London.
33. Martins, E.P. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 : 296 299.
34. Martins, E.P. 2004. Compare, version 4.6b. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Distributed by the author at http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
35. Messina, F.J. 1991. Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competition ability. Oecologia 85 : 447 455.
36. Minder, A.M., Hosken, D.J. Ward, P.I. 2005. Co-evolution of male and female reproductive characters across the Scathophagidae (Diptera). J. Evol. Biol. 18 : 60 69.
37. Morrow, E.H. Gage, M.J.G. 2000. The evolution of sperm length in moths. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 : 307 313.
38. Parker, G.A. 1998. The evolution of ejaculates. In : Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T. R. Birkhead A. P. Møller, eds pp. 3 54. Academic Press, London.
39. Parker, G.A. Ball, M.A. 2005. Sperm competition, mating rate and the evolution of testis and ejaculate sizes: a population model. Biol. Lett. 1 : 235 238.
40. Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. Gage, M.J.G. 1996. Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263 : 1291 1297.
41. Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. Gage, M.J.G. 1997. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264 : 1793 1802.
42. Pitnick, S., Markow, T. Spicer, G.S. 1999. Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53 : 1804 1822.
43. Pitnick, S., Miller, G.T., Reagan, J. Holland, B. 2001. Males' evolutionary response to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 1071 1080.
44. Pitnick, S., Miller, G.T., Schneider, K. Markow, T.A. 2003. Ejaculate - female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 : 1507 1512.
45. Presgraves, D.C., Baker, R.H. Wilkinson, G.S. 1999. Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 : 1041 1047.
46. Rasband, W.S. 2006. ImageJ. US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Available at: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.
47. Reinhold, K., Kurtz, J. Engqvist, L. 2002. Cryptic male choice: sperm allocation strategies when female quality varies. J. Evol. Biol. 15 : 201 209.
48. Rohlf, F.J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55 : 2143 2160.
49. Rönn, J., Katvala, M. Arnqvist, G. 2006. The costs of mating and egg production in Callosobruchus seed beetles. Anim. Behav. 72 : 335 342.
50. Rönn, J., Katvala, M. Arnqvist, G. 2007. Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104 : 10921 10925.
51. Rönn, J., Katvala, M. Arnqvist, G. 2008. Interspecific variation in ejaculate allocation and associated effects on female fitness in seed beetles. J. Evol. Biol. doi :.
52. Rowe, L. Arnqvist, G. 2002. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56 : 754 767.
53. Rugman-Jones, P.F. Eady, P.E. 2007. Conspecific sperm precedence in Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Coleoptera : Bruchidae): mechanisms and consequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 274 : 983 988.
54. Savalli, U.M. Fox, C.W. 1999. The effect of male mating history on paternal investment, fecundity and female remating in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct. Ecol. 13 : 169 177.
55. Simmons, L.W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
56. Simmons, L.W. Siva-Jothy, M.T. 1998. Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In : Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T. R. Birkhead A. P. Møller, eds pp. 341 432. Academic Press, London.
57. Simmons, L.W., Teale, R.J., Maier, M., Standish, R.J., Bailey, W.J. Withers, P.C. 1992. Some costs of reproduction for male bushcrickets, Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae): allocating resources to mate attraction and nuptial feeding. Behav. Ecol. 31 : 57 62.
58. Svärd, L. Wiklund, C. 1989. Mass and production rate of ejaculates in relation to monandry polyandry in butterflies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24 : 395 402.
59. Takakura, K.-I. 1999. Active female courtship behaviour and male nutritional contribution to female fecundity in Bruchidius dorsalis (Fahraeus) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Res. Popul. Ecol. 41 : 269 273.
60. Takakura, K.-I. 2001. Courtship-role-reversal in the bean weevil, Bruchidius dorsalis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): interplay between male-male competition and cryptic female choice. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 36 : 311 316.
61. Takakura, K.-I. 2004. The nutritional contribution of males affects the feeding behaviour and spatial distribution of females in a Bruchid beetle, Bruchidius dorsalis. J. Ethol. 22 : 37 42.
62. Tuda, M., Rönn, J., Buranapanichpan, S., Wasano, N. Arnqvist, G. 2006. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): traits associated with stored-product pest status. Mol. Evol. 15 : 3541 3551.
63. Vahed, K. 2006. Larger ejaculate volumes are associated with a lower degree of polyandry across bushcricket taxa. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 273 : 2387 2394.
64. Wedell, N., Gage, M.J.G. Parker, G.A. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17 : 313 320.
65. Williams, P.D., Day, T. Cameron, E. 2005. The evolution of sperm-allocation strategies and the degree of sperm competition. Evolution 59 : 492 499.