Study characteristics of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the Southeastern Section of the American Urological Association (1996-2005)

Journal of Urology

Volumn 179, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 667-672

  Fesperman, Susan F ^a   West, C Shawn ^a   Bischoff, Carl J ^a   Algood, Chester B ^a   Vieweg, Johannes ^a   Dahm, Philipp ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Congresses statistics numerical data; Peer review, research; Research design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUTHOR; CHILD UROLOGY; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META ANALYSIS; MICTURITION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ONCOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; UROLOGY; BIBLIOMETRICS; DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PUBLICATION; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING AS TOPIC; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES; UROLOGY;

EID: 38849089524     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.070     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Eloubeidi MA, Wade SB and Provenzale D: Factors associated with acceptance and full publication of GI endoscopic research originally published in abstract form. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:275.
2. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Cook DJ et al: Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A: 158.
3. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C and Young G: Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998;280:254.
4. Ng L, Hersey K and Fleshner N: Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2004;94:79.
5. Smith WA, Cancel QV, Tseng TY, Sultan S, Vieweg J and Dahm P: Factors associated with the full publication of studies presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. J Urol 2007;177:1084.
6. Borawski KM, Norris RD, Fesperman SF, Vieweg J, Preminger GM and Dahm P: Levels of evidence in the urological literature. J Urol 2007;178:1429.
7. Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Peterson BL, Preminger GM and Dahm P: Clinical research and statistical methods in the urology literature. J Urol 2005;174:1374.
8. Dahm P and Preminger GM: Introducing levels of evidence to publications in urology. BJU Int 2007;100:246.
9. Fitzpatrick JM: Evidence-based medicine 'up front'. BJU Int 2006;97:1141.
10. Graduate medical education. JAMA 1997;278:775.
11. Brotherton SE and Etzel SI: Graduate medical education, 2005-2006. JAMA 2006;296:1154.
12. Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, Henault LE, Chang Y, Starr R et al: The "gender gap" in authorship of academic medical literature-a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006;355:281.
13. Rao AR, Beatty JD, Laniado M, Motiwala HG and Karim OM: Publication rate of abstracts presented at the British Association of Urological Surgeons Annual Meeting. BJU Int 2006;97:306.
14. Hoag CC, Elterman DS and Macneily AE: Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol 2006;176:2624.
15. Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, De Sio M and Damiano R: Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol 2007;51:833.
16. Autorino R, Quarto G, Sio MD, Lima E, Quarto E, Damiano R et al: Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of Endourology: are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? J Endourol 2006;20:996.