Cellular dynamics and tissue interactions of the dura mater during head development

Birth Defects Research Part C - Embryo Today: Reviews

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 297-304

  Gagan, Jeffrey R ^a   Tholpady, Sunil S ^a   Ogle, Roy C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRE RECOMBINASE; STROMAL CELL DERIVED FACTOR 1; WNT1 PROTEIN;

BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL COMPOSITION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CEREBELLUM CORTEX; CRANIAL SUTURE; DENTATE GYRUS; DEVELOPMENT; DURA MATER; HEAD; HEMATOPOIETIC CELL; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INFANCY; INTERSTITIAL CELL OF CAJAL; MESENCHYME; MESODERM; MORPHOGENESIS; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NEURAL CREST; NEURAL CREST CELL; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOCLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOPLASMATIC ASTROCYTE; REVIEW; SKULL; SKULL DEVELOPMENT; STEM CELL; TISSUE INTERACTION; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; BETA-GALACTOSIDASE; BRAIN; CRANIAL SUTURES; CRANIOSYNOSTOSES; DURA MATER; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTORS; GENES, REPORTER; HEAD; INTEGRASES; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MUTATION; PARIETAL BONE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; WNT1 PROTEIN;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 38749144407     PISSN: 1542975X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdrc.20104     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Baker CV, Bronner-Fraser M. 1997. The origins of the neural crest. Part II: An evolutionary perspective. Mech Dev 69:13-29.
2. Berger O, Li G, Han SM, et al. 2007. Expression of SDF-1 and CXCR4 during reorganization of the postnatal dentate gyrus. Dev Neurosci 29:48-58.
3. Borrell V, Marín O. 2006. Meninges control tangential migration of hem-derived Cajal-Retzius cells via CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling. Nat Neurosci 9:1284-1293.
4. Bradley JP, Levine JP, McCarthy JG, et al. 1997. Studies in cranial suture biology: regional dura mater determines in vitro cranial suture fusion. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1091-1099 discussion; 1100-1102.
5. Chai Y, Jiang X, Ito Y, et al. 2000. Fate of the mammalian cranial neural crest during tooth and mandibular morphogenesis. Development 127: 1671-1679.
6. Cohen MM, Jr. 2006. The new bone biology: pathologic, molecular, and clinical correlates. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 140:2646-2706.
7. Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM, et al. 1993. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117:409-429.
8. Gans C, Northcutt R. 1983. Neural crest and the origin of vertebrates: a new head. Science 220:268-274.
9. Greenwald JA, Mehrara BJ, Spector JA, et al. 2000. Regional differentiation of cranial suture-associated dura mater in vivo and in vitro: implications for suture fusion and patency. J Bone Miner Res 15:2413-2430.
10. Hartmann D, Sievers J, Pehlemann FW, et al. 1992. Destruction of meningeal cells over the medial cerebral hemisphere of newborn hamsters prevents the formation of the infrapyramidal blade of the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol 320:33-61.
11. Iseki S, Wilkie AO, Morriss-Kay GM, et al. 1999. Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 have distinct differentiation- and proliferation-related roles in the developing mouse skull vault. Development 126:5611-5620.
12. Ishii M, Merrill A, Chan Y, et al. 2003. Msx2 and Twist cooperatively control the development of the neural crest-derived skeletogenic mesenchyme of the murine skull vault. Development 130:6131-6142.
13. Ito Y, Yeo JY, Chytil A, et al. 2003. Conditional inactivation of Tgfbr2 in cranial neural crest causes cleft palate and calvaria defects. Development 130: 5269-5280.
14. Itoh N, Ornitz DM. 2004. Evolution of the Fgf and Fgfr gene families. Trends Genet 20:563-569.
15. Jiang X, Rowitch D, Soriano P, et al. 2000. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development 127: 1607-1616.
16. Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, et al. 2002. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol 241:106-116.
17. Johnson DE, Williams LT. 1993. Structural and functional diversity in the FGF receptor multigene family. Adv Cancer Res 60:1-41.
18. Johnson D, Iseki S, Wilkie AO, et al. 2000. Expression patterns of Twist and Fgfr1, -2 and -3 in the developing mouse coronal suture suggest a key role for twist in suture initiation and biogenesis. Mech Dev 91:341-345.
19. Morriss-Kay GM. 2001. Derivation of the mammalian skull vault. J Anat 199(Pt 1-2.):143-151.
20. Morriss-Kay GM, Wilkie AO. 2005. Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies. J Anat 207:637-653.
21. Ogle RC, Tholpady SS, et al. 2004. Regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis. Cells Tissues Organs 176:54-66.
22. Opperman LA, Sweeney TM, Redmon J, et al. 1993. Tissue interactions with underlying dura mater inhibit osseous obliteration of developing cranial sutures. Dev Dyn 198:312-322.
23. Opperman LA, Passarelli RW, Morgan EP, et al. 1995. Cranial sutures require tissue interactions with dura mater to resist osseous obliteration in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 10:1978-1987.
24. Opperman LA, Rawlins JT. 2005. The extracellular matrix environment in suture morphogenesis and growth. Cells Tissues Organs 181:127-135.
25. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. 2001. Fibroblast growth factors. Genome Biol 2: REVIEWS3005.
26. Petrie C, Tholpady SS, Ogle R, Botchwey E. 2007. Proliferative capacity and osteogenic potential of novel dura mater stem cells on poly-lactic-co- glycolic acid. J Biomed Mater Res A. E pub ahead of print.
27. Reiss K, Mentlein R, Sievers J, et al. 2002 Stromal cell-derived factor 1 is secreted by meningeal cells and acts as chemotactic factor on neuronal stem cells of the cerebellar external granular layer. Neuroscience 115:295-305.
28. Sarkar S, Petiot A, Copp A, et al. 2001. FGF2 promotes skeletogenic differentiation of cranial neural crest cells. Development 128:2143-2152.
29. Supèr H, Martínez A, Soriano E, et al. 1997. Degeneration of Cajal-Retzius cells in the developing cerebral cortex of the mouse after ablation of meningeal cells by 6-hydroxydopamine. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 98:15-20.
30. Tholpady SS, Freyman TF, Chachra D, et al. 2007. Tensional forces influence gene expression and sutural state of rat calvariae in vitro. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 120:601-611; discussion 612-603.
31. Twigg SR, Kan R, Babbs C, et al. 2004. Mutations of ephrin-B1 (EFNB1), a marker of tissue boundary formation, cause craniofrontonasal syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8652-8657.
32. Warren SM, Brunet LJ, Harland RM, et al. 2003a. The BMP antagonist noggin regulates cranial suture fusion. Nature 422:625-629.
33. Warren SM, Greenwald JA, Nacamuli RP, et al. 2003b. Regional dura mater differentially regulates osteoblast gene expression. J Craniofacial Surg 14:363-370.
34. Wilkie AO, Tang Z, Elanko N, et al. 2000. Functional haploinsufficiency of the human homeobox gene MSX2 causes defects in skull ossification. Nat Genet 24:387-390.
35. Wilkie AO. 2005. Bad bones, absent smell, selfish testes: the pleiotropic consequences of human FGF receptor mutations. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 16:187-203.
36. Yoshida T, Phylactou LA, Uney JB, et al. 2005. Twist is required for establishment of the mouse coronal suture. J Anat 206:437-444.
37. Zhu Y, Yu T, et al. 2003. Role of the chemokine SDF-1 as the meningeal attractant for embryonic cerebellar neurons. Nat Neurosci 5:719-720.