Increasing the accuracy in locally divergence-preserving finite volume schemes for MHD

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 227, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 3405-3427

  Artebrant, Robert ^a   Torrilhon, Manuel ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Divergence constraint; Finite volume method; High order reconstruction; Magnetohydrodynamics

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

BASE SCHEME; DIVERGENCE CONSTRAINT; DIVERGENCE ERROR; FINITE VOLUME SCHEMES; FINITE-VOLUME METHOD; FOURTH-ORDER; HIGH-ORDER; HIGH-ORDER RECONSTRUCTION; HIGHER-ORDER; IDEAL MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS EQUATIONS;

FINITE VOLUME METHOD;

EID: 38749137709     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Artebrant R. Third order accurate non-polynomial reconstruction on rectangular and triangular meshes. J. Sci. Comput. 30 (2007) 193-221
2. R. Artebrant, Reconstruction techniques and finite volume schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, PhD Thesis, Numerical Analysis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 2006.
3. Artebrant R., and Schroll H.J. Limiter-free third order logarithmic reconstruction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2006) 359-381
4. Balsara D.S. Second-order-accurate schemes for magnetohydro-dynamics with divergence-free reconstruction. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 151 (2004) 149-184
5. Brackbill J.U., and Barnes D.C. The effect of nonzero ∇ · B = 0 on the numerical solution of the magnetohydrodynamic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 35 (1980) 426-430
6. Dai W., and Woodward P.R. A simple finite difference scheme for multidimensional magnetohydrodynamical equations. J. Comput. Phys. 142 (1998) 331-369
7. Dedner A., Kemm F., Kröner D., Munz C.-D., Schnitzer T., and Wesenberg M. Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys. 175 (2002) 645-673
8. Evans C.R., and Hawley J.F. Simulation of magnetohydrodynamic flows: a constrained transport method. Astrophys. J. 332 (1988) 659-677
9. Fedkiw R.P., Merriman B., and Osher S. Simplified discretization of systems of hyperbolic conservation laws containing advection equations. J. Comput. Phys. 157 (2000) 302-326
10. Gottlieb S., Shu C.-W., and Tadmor E. Strong stability-preserving high order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43 (2001) 89-112
11. Jiang G.-S., and Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1996) 202-228
12. Jiang G.-S., and Wu C.-C. A high order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 150 (1999) 561-594
13. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1992) 16-42
14. K.G. Powell, An approximate Riemann solver for magnetohydro-dynamics (That works in more than one dimension), ICASE Report 94-24, 1994.
15. Powell K.G., Roe P.L., Linde T.J., and Gombosi T.I. A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 154 (1999) 284-309
16. Shi J., Hu C., and Shu C.-W. A technique of treating negative weights in WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 175 (2002) 108-127
17. Spiteri R., and Ruuth S. A new class of optimal high-order strong-stability-preserving time discretization methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 40 (2004) 469-491
18. Torrilhon M. Locally divergence-preserving upwind finite volume schemes for magnetohydrodynamic equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26 (2005) 1166-1191
19. Torrilhon M., and Fey M. Constraint-preserving upwind methods for multidimensional advection equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 42 (2004) 1694-1728
20. Tóth G. The ∇ · B = 0 constraint in shock-capturing magnetohydrodynamics codes. J. Comput. Phys. 161 (2000) 605-652