Objective evaluation of expert performance during human robotic surgical procedures

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 307-312

  Judkins, Timothy N ^a   Oleynikov, Dmitry ^b   Stergiou, Nick ^c,d  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Nissan fundoplication; Operating room; Performance; Quantitative; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

LAPAROSCOPY; OPERATING ROOMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

FUNDOPLICATION; GRIP FORCE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURES; NISSAN FUNDOPLICATION; OBJECTIVE EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE; QUANTITATIVE; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TASK PERFORMANCE;

NEEDLES;

EID: 38749132343     PISSN: 18632483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-007-0067-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skill: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60:39-45
2. Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M (2004) Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 18(1):63-67
3. Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Soper NJ, Damiano RJ, Klingensmith ME (2002) The effect of robotic assistance on learning curves for basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 183(6):702-707
4. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18(5):790-795
5. Mack MJ (2001) Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. J Am Med Assoc 285(5):568-572
6. Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W (2003) A performance study comparing manual and robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 17(10):1595-1599
7. Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N (2005) Real-time augmented feedback benefits robotic laparoscopic training. Stud Health Technol Inform 119:243-248
8. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller J, Steiner CP, Hahn JF (1998) Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 133:957-961
9. DeUgarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB (2003) Robotic surgery and resident training. Surg Endosc 17:960-963
10. Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17(11):1744-1748
11. Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N (2006) Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 20(1):96-103
12. Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2003) Robot-assisted laparoscopic intestinal anastomosis. Surg Endosc V17(2):236-241
13. Lomanto D, Cheah W-K, So JB, Goh PM (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A pilot study. Arch Surg 136(10):1106-1108
14. Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, and Stergiou N (2007) Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks. Surg Endosc (in press)
15. Judkins TN, Oleynikov D, and Stergiou N (2007) Enhanced robotic surgical training using augmented visual feedback. Surg Innov (in press)
16. Jacobsen G, Elli F, Horgan S (2004) Robotic surgery update. Surg Endosc 18:1186-1191
17. Perez A, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, Brooks DC, Whang EE (2003) What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery? Surg Endosc 17(5):811
18. D'Annibale AMD, Fiscon VMD, Trevisan PMD, Pozzobon MMD, Gianfreda VMD, Sovernigo GMD, Morpurgo EMD, Orsini CMD, Del Monte DMD (2004) The da vinci robot in right adrenalectomy: considerations on technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14(1):38-41
19. Gray A (ed) (1997) Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces with mathematica. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton
20. Weisstein EW (2006) Curvature. [cited 2006 August]. Available from: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Curvature.html
21. Campbell MJ, Gardner MJ (1988) Calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analyses. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296(6634):1454-1456
22. Bates BT (1996) Single-subject methodology: an alternative approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28(5):631-638
23. Dufek JD, Bates BT (1991) Biomechanical factors associated with injury during landing in jump sports. Sports Med 12(5):326-337
24. Bates BT, James CR, Dufek JD (2004) Single-subject analysis. In: Stergiou N (ed) Innovative analysis of human movement. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 3-28
25. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomizes, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458-464