Perceived vulnerability to disease is positively related to the strength of preferences for apparent health in faces

Journal of Evolutionary Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 131-139

  Welling, L L M ^a   Conway, C A ^a   Debruine, L M ^a   Jones, B C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disgust; Facial attractiveness; Health; Illness; Individual differences; Vulnerability to disease

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749116535     PISSN: 17892082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/JEP.2007.1012     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cornwell, R. E., Boothroyd, L. G., Burt, D. M., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Pitman, R. M., Whiten, S. and Perrett, D. I. (2004): Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 271, 635640.
2. Debruine, L. M. (2004): Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 271, 20852090.
3. Fessler, D. M. T., Eng, S. J. and Navarrete C. D. (2005): Elevated disgust sensitivity in the first trimester of pregnancy: Evidence supporting the compensatory prophylaxis hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 344351.
4. Fessler, D. M. (2002): Reproductive immunosuppression and diet. Current Anthropology, 43, 1961.
5. Flaxman, S. M. and Sherman, P. W. (2000): Morning sickness: A mechanism for protecting mother and embryo. Quarterly Review of Biology, 75, 113148.
6. Gilbert, S. F. (2000): Developmental Biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
7. Grammer, K. and Thornhill, R. (1994): Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comprehensive Psychology, 108, 233242.
8. Haidt, J., McCauley, C. and Rozin, P. (1994): Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701713.
9. Henderson, J. J. A and Anglin, J. M. (2003): Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 5, 351356.
10. Hogg, M. A. and Graham, M. V. (1995): Social Psychology: An Introduction. London: Prentice Hall.
11. Hnekopp, J. (2006): Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 199209.
12. Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. and Grammer, K. (2001): Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for a hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 251267.
13. Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., Cornwell, R. E., Feinberg, D. R., Tiddeman, B. P., Whiten, S., Pitman, R. M., Hillier, S. G., Burt, D. M., Stirrat, M. R., Law Smith, M. J. and Moore, F. R. (2005): Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 347354.
14. Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H. and Johnson, R. M. (1998): Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science, 1, 813.
15. Law Smith, M. J., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., Boothroyd, L. G., Durrani, S. J., Stirrat, M. R., Whiten, S., Pitman, R. M. and Hillier, S. G. (2006): Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 10, 16.
16. Mason, M. F., Tatkow, E. P. and Macrae, C. N. (2005): The look of love: Gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science, 3, 236239.
17. Navarrete, C. D. and Fessler, D. M. T. (2006): Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: the effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 270282.
18. Park, J. H., Faulkner, J. and Schaller, M. (2003): Evolved disease-avoidant processes and contemporary antisocial behavior: Prejudicial attitudes and avoidance of people with physical disabilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2, 6587.
19. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K. and Minamisawa, R. (1999): Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741742.
20. Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A. and Mckay, R. (2001): Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 3146.
21. Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Jones, B. C., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V. and Petrie, M. (2005a): MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans. Biology Letters, 4, 400403.
22. Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., Gosling, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Carter, V. S., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S. and Petrie, M. (2005b): MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 213226.
23. Roujeau, J. C. (2001): Clinical criteria and risk factors. Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie, 128, 376381.
24. Rowland, D. A. and Perrett, D. I. (1995): Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 5, 7076.
25. Tiddeman, B., Burt, M. and Perrett, D. (2001): Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 1, 4250.