Efficacy of three rotary NiTi instruments in removing gutta-percha from root canals

International Endodontic Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 191-196

  Tasdemir T ^a   Er, K ^a   Yildirim, T ^a   Celik D ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Gutta percha; Root canal retreatment; Rotary instruments

Indexed keywords

GUTTA PERCHA; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RETREATMENT; TOOTH PULP;

DENTAL HIGH-SPEED EQUIPMENT; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; NICKEL; RETREATMENT; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM;

EID: 38749113963     PISSN: 01432885     EISSN: 13652591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01335.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barletta FB, Rahde NM, Limongi O, Moura AA, Zanesco C, Mazocatto G (2007) In vitro comparative analysis of 2 mechanical techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. Journal of Canadian Dental Association 73, 65 65e.
2. Barrieshi-Nusair KM (2002) Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files. Journal of Endodontics 28, 454 6.
3. Betti LV, Bramante CM (2001) Quantec SC rotary instruments versus hand files for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 34, 514 9.
4. de Carvalho Maciel AC, Zaccaro Scelza MF (2006) Efficacy of automated versus hand instrumentation during root canal retreatment: an ex vivo study. International Endodontic Journal 39, 779 84.
5. Ferreira JJ, Rhodes JS, Pitt Ford TR (2001) The efficacy of gutta-percha removal using profiles. International Endodontic Journal 34, 267 74.
6. Foschi F, Nucci C, Montebugnoli L et al. (2004) SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal 37, 832 9.
7. Hülsmann M, Bluhm V (2004) Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 37, 468 76.
8. Hülsmann M, Stotz S (1997) Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 30, 227 33.
9. Imura N, Kato AS, Hata G-I, Uemura M, Toda T, Weine F (2000) A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 33, 361 6.
10. Kaplowitz GJ (1990) Evaluation of gutta-percha solvents. Journal of Endodontics 16, 539 40.
11. Kosti E, Lambrianidis T, Economides N, Neofitou C (2006) Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer. International Endodontic Journal 39, 48 54.
12. Masiero AV, Barletta FB (2005) Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 38, 2 7.
13. de Oliveira DP, Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira FB (2006) Comparison between gutta-percha and resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. Journal of Endodontics 32, 362 4.
14. Robertson D, Leeb J, McKee M, Brewer E (1980) A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. Journal of Endodontics 6, 421 4.
15. Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH (2007) Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal retreatment. Journal of Endodontics 33, 38 41.
16. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T (2006a) Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. International Endodontic Journal 39, 196 202.
17. Schäfer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T (2006b) Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. International Endodontic Journal 39, 203 12.
18. Schirrmeister JF, Meyer KM, Hermanns P, Altenburger MJ, Wrbas KT (2006a) Effectiveness of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing a new synthetic polymer-based root canal obturation material (epiphany) during retreatment. International Endodontic Journal 39, 150 6.
19. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E (2006b) Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. Journal of Endodontics 32, 469 72.
20. Schirrmeister JF, Hermanns P, Meyer KM, Goetz F, Hellwig E (2006c) Detectability of residual epiphany and gutta-percha after root canal retreatment using a dental operating microscope and radiographs - an ex vivo study. International Endodontic Journal 39, 558 65.
21. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Schneider FH, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E (2006d) Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing guttapercha in curved root canals during retreatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 101, 542 7.
22. Schneider SW (1971) A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, and Oral Pathology 32, 271 5.
23. Siqueira JF Jr. (2001) Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail (literature review). International Endodontic Journal 34, 1 10.
24. Stabholz A, Friedman S (1988) Endodontic retreatment case selection and technique part-2: treatment planning for retreatment. Journal of Endodontics 14, 607 14.
25. Tamse A, Unger U, Metzger Z, Rosenberg M (1986) Gutta-percha solvents: a comparative study. Journal of Endodontics 12, 337 9.
26. Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S (2005) A comparative study of endoflare-hero shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. International Endodontic Journal 38, 610 6.
27. Wilcox L (1995) Endodontic retreatment with halothane versus chloroform solvent. Journal of Endodontics 21, 305 7.
28. Yared GM, Dagher FEB, Machtou P (2001) Failure of ProFile instruments used with high and low torque motors. International Endodontic Journal 34, 471 5.
29. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Banegas G (2006) Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study. International Endodontic Journal 39, 521 6.