A visual sign of lateral acceleration for steering assistance

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 145-157

  Milleville Pennel, Isabelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Perception of lateral acceleration; Steering assistance; Visual and kinaesthetic information

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; USER INTERFACES; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

KINAESTHETIC INFORMATION; LATERAL ACCELERATION; LOAD TRANSFER; STEERING ASSISTANCE;

STEERING;

EID: 38749093717     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alais D., and Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 14 (2004) 257-262
2. Baumberger B., Isableu B., and Flückiger M. The visual control of stability in children and adults: postural readjustments in a ground optical flow. Experimental Brain Research 159 (2004) 33-46
3. Brandt T., Wist E.R., and Dichgans L. Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation. Perception and Psychophysics 17 (1975) 497-503
4. Coello Y., Milleville-Pennel I., and Orliaguet J.P. Weighted visuo-proprioceptive interaction in video-assisted pointing task explains spatial inaccuracy with rotated visual display. Neuroscience Letters 369 (2004) 214-218
5. Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (2002) 429-433
6. Fourneret P., and Jeannerod M. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 36 (1998) 1133-1140
7. Freides D. Human information processing and sensory modality: cross-modal functions, information complexity, memory and deficit. Psychological Bulletin 81 (1974) 284-310
8. Freitas P.B., and Barela J.A. Postural control as a function of self and object-motion perception. Neuroscience Letters 369 (2004) 64-68
9. Grondin S., and Rousseau R. Judging the relative duration of multimodal empty time intervals. Perception and Psychophysics 9 (1991) 245-256
10. Heino A., Van der Molen H.H., and Wilde G.J. Differences in risk experience between sensation avoiders and sensation seekers. Personality and Individual Differences 20 (1996) 71-79
11. Humphreys G.W., Duncan J., and Treisman A. Attention, Space and Action (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford
12. Isableu B., Ohlmann T., Crémieux J., and Amblard B. How dynamic visual field dependance-independance interacts with the visual contribution to postural control. Human Movement Science 17 (1997) 367-391
13. Isableu B., Ohlmann T., Crémieux J., and Amblard B. Differential approach to strategies of segmental stabilisation in postural control. Experimental Brain Research 150 (2003) 208-221
14. Kawatika T., Kuno S., Miyake Y., and Watanabe S. Body sway induced by depth linear vection in reference to central and peripheral visual field. Japanese Journal of Physiology 50 (2000) 315-321
15. Kemeny A., and Panerai F. Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 31-37
16. Kinney J.A., and Luria S.M. Conflicting visual and kinesthetic stimulation. Perception and Psychophysics 8 (1970) 189-192
17. Kirsner K., Speelman C., Maybery M., O'Brien-Malone, Anderson M., and MacLeod C. Implicit and Explicit Mental Process (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
18. Land M.F., and Horwood J. The relation between head and eye movements during driving. In: Gale A.G., Brown I.D., Haslegrave C.M., and Taylor S.P. (Eds). Vision in Vehicules-V (1996), Elsevier, Amsterdam 153-160
19. Lee D.N., and Lishman J.R. Visual proprioceptive control of stance. Journal of Human Movement Studies 1 (1975) 87-95
20. Lewkowicz D.J. The development of temporal and spatial intermodal perception. In: Aschersleben G., Bachmann T., and Müsseler J. (Eds). Cognitive Contribution to the Perception of Spatial and Temporal Events (1999), Elsevier, Amsterdam 396-425
21. Luyat M., Olhmann T., and Barraud P.A. Subjective vertical and postural activity. Acta Psychologica 95 (1997) 181-193
22. Mergner T., Schweigart G., Müller M., Hlavacka F., and Becker W. Visual contributions to human self-motion perception during horizontal body rotation. Archives Italiennes de Biologie 138 (2000) 139-166
23. Milleville-Pennel, I., Jolly, E., Hoc, J.M. The use of hazard road signs to improve the perception of severe bends. Accident Analysis and Prevention, in press.
24. Morein-Zamir S., Soto-Faraco S., and Kingstone A. Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research 17 (2003) 154-163
25. Pashler H.E. The Psychology of Attention (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
26. Reymond G., Kemeny A., Droulez J., and Berthoz A. Role of lateral acceleration in curve driving: driver model and experiments on a real vehicle and driving simulator. Human Factors 43 (2001) 483-495
27. Reymond G., Droulez J., and Kemeny A. Visuovestibular perception of self-motion modelled as a dynamic optimisation process. Biological Cybernetic 87 (2002) 301-314
28. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., and Kingstone A. Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 330-345
29. Stoffregen T.A. Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance 11 (1985) 554-565
30. Stoffregen T.A. The role of optical velocity in the control of stance. Perception and Psychophysics 39 (1986) 355-360
31. Van Beers R.J., Haggard P., and Wolpert D.M. The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of Neurophysiology 91 (2004) 1050-1063
32. Wilde G.J. Risk homeostasis theory: an overview. Injury Prevention 4 (1998) 89-91
33. Witkin H.A., and Ash S.E. Studies in space orientation. IV. Further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (1948) 762-782
34. Zikovitz D.C., and Harris L.R. Head tilt during driving. Ergonomics 42 (1999) 740-746