Hip resurfacing: Mid-term results of the last-generation metal-on-metal devices

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 202-206

  Giannini, S ^a   Moroni, A ^a   Romagnoli, M ^a   Cadossi, M ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Femoral head; Hip resurfacing arthroplasty; Metal on metal; Osteoarthritis; Osteonecrosis

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM FRACTURE; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BLOOD VESSEL RUPTURE; BONE CYST; EPIPHYSIOLYSIS; FEMALE; FEMORAL NERVE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL IMPLANTATION; MOBILIZATION; NERVE PARALYSIS; OSTEOPENIA; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PERTHES DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SURGICAL INJURY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 38749086435     PISSN: 15909921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10195-007-0094-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Weber BG (1996) Experience with the Metasul total hip bearing system. Clin Orthop 329:S69-S77
2. Wagner M, Wagner H (1996) Preliminary results of uncemented metal-on-metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacement arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 329:S78-S88
3. Howie DW, Cornish BL, Vernon-Roberts B (1993) The viability of the femoral head after resurfacing hip arthroplasty in humans. Clin Orthop 291:171-184
4. Campbell P, Mirra J, Amstutz HC (2000) Viability of the femoral heads treated with resurfacing arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 15(1):120-122
5. Capello WN, Ireland PH, Tramell TR et al (1978) Conservative total hip arthroplasty: A procedure to conserve bone stock. Part 1 and Part 2. Clin Orthop 134:59-74
6. Dorr LD, Kane TJ 3rd, Conaty JP (1994) Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger: A 16 year follow up study. J Arthroplasty 9:453-456
7. Joshi ANB, Porter ML, Trail IA et al (1993) Long term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:616-623
8. Malchau P, Herberts P, Soderman P, Oden A (2000) Update and validation of results from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979-1998. In: Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons
9. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki K, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H (2004) Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:185-189
10. Loughead JM, Chesney D, Holland JP, McCaskie AW (2005) Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:163-166
11. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:177-184
12. Treacy RCB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB (2005) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:167-170
13. Amstutz HC, Beaulè PE, Frederick JD, Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: Two-to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:28-39
14. Millennium Research Group (2002) Global markets for hip reconstructive devices 2002. Millennium Research Group, Toronto
15. Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Girard J, Roy AG (2006) A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(8):997-1002
16. Shimmin AJ, Back D (2005) Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: A national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:463-464
17. Back DL, Young DA, Shimmin AJ (2005) How do serum cobalt and chromium levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop 438:177-181
18. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Salama A, Pradhan C, McMinn DJ (2006) The effect of the diameter of metal-on-metal bearings on systemic exposure to cobalt and chromium. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(4):443-448