ERP components activated by the "GO!" and "WITHHOLD!" conflict in the random Sustained Attention to Response Task

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 57-64

  Zordan, Lara ^a   Sarlo, Michela ^a   Stablum, Franca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Go No Go task; LRP; Motor inhibition; N2; P3; Sustained attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 38649139134     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bitter W., Sussman E., Deacon D., Cowan N., and Vaughan J.R. Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 835-838
2. Coles M.G.H. Modern mind brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 26 (1989) 251-269
3. De Jong R., Coles M.G.H., and Logan G.D. In search of the point of no return. The control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16 1 (1990) 164-182
4. De Jong R., Coles M.G.H., Logan G.D., and Gratton G. Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 3 (1995) 498-511
5. Dockree P.M., Kelly S.P., Robertson I.H., Reilly R.B., and Foxe J.J. Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behaviour: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage 27 (2005) 587-601
6. Falkenstein M., Koshlykova N.A., Kiroj V.N., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/No-Go tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 96 (1995) 36-43
7. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/No-Go tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica 101 (1999) 267-291
8. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., and Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: Variation with modality, age and time-on-task. Journal of Psychophysiology 16 (2002) 167-175
9. Fallgatter A.J., and Strik W.K. Right frontal activation during the continuous performance test assessed with near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy subjects. Neuroscience Letters 223 (1997) 89-92
10. Fallgatter A.J., and Strik W.K. The NoGo-anteriorization as a neurophysiological standard-index for cognitive response control. International Journal of Psychophysiology 32 (1999) 233-238
11. Fassbender C., Murphy K., Foxe J.J., Wylie G.R., Javitt D.C., Robertson I.H., et al. A topography of executive functions and their interactions revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research 20 (2004) 132-143
12. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Murphy K., Roche R.A.P., and Stein E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behaviour: Inhibition, error detection and correction. NeuroImage 17 (2002) 1820-1829
13. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Kaufman J., and Stein E.A. A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring. NeuroImage 20 (2003) 1132-1139
14. Kawashima R., Satoh K., Itoh H., Ono S., Furumoto S., Gotoh R., et al. Functional anatomy of Go/No-Go discrimination and response selection-a PET study in man. Brain Research 728 (1996) 79-89
15. Manly T., Owen A.M., McAvinue L., Datta A., Lewis G.H., Scott S.K., et al. Enhancing the sensitivity of a sustained attention task to frontal damage. Convergent clinical and functional imaging evidence. Neurocase 4 9 (2003) 340-349
16. Pliszka S.R., Liotti M., and Woldorff M.G. Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response inhibition mechanism. Biological Psychiatry 48 (2000) 238-246
17. Potts G.F. An ERP index of task relevance of visual stimuli. Brain and Cognition 56 (2004) 5-13
18. Robertson I.H., Manly T., Andrade J., Baddeley B.T., and Yiend J. "Oops!" Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 24 5 (1997) 636-647
19. Roche R.A.P., Garavan H., Foxe J.J., and O'Mara S.M. Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition. Experimental Brain Research 160 1 (2005) 60-70
20. Rosvold H.E., Mirsky A.F., Sarason I., Bransome Jr. E.D., and Beck L.K. A continuous performance test of brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology 20 (1956) 343-350
21. Schneider W., Eschman A., and Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide (2002), Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh, PA
22. Semlitsch H.V., Anderer P., Schuster P., and Presslich O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23 (1986) 695-703
23. Spencer K.M., Dien J., and Donchin E. A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 409-414