The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile (MSIP). Development and testing psychometric properties of an ICF-based health measure

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 261-274

  Wynia, Klaske ^a   Middel, Berrie ^a   van Dijk, Jitse ^a   de Ruiter, Han ^b   De Keyser, Jacques ^a   Reijneveld, Sijmen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b HANZE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Functional health outcome measurement; International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health; Multiple sclerosis; Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile; Psychometric properties

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXCRETION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LIFE STRESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IMPACT PROFILE; MUSCULOSKELETAL FUNCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 38649128470     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280701256868     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Olek, M. J. and Dawson, D. M. (2002) Multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Neurology in clinical practice, 2, Butterworth Heineman, New York
2. Dangond, F. (2005) Multiple sclerosis. Internet, Electronic Citation
3. Hartelius, L. and Svensson, P. (1994) Speech and swallowing symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. A survey. Folia Phoniatric Logopaed, 46, pp. 9-17.
4. Krupp, L. B. (2003) Fatigue in multiple sclerosis - Definition, pathophysiology and treatment. CNS Drugs, 17, pp. 225-234.
5. Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L. and Unverzagt, F. (1991) Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. 1. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology, 41, pp. 685-691.
6. World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health, ICF, World Health Organization, Geneva
7. Ustun, B., Chatterji, S. and Kostanjsek, N. (2004) Comments from WHO for the Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Special Supplement on ICF Core Sets. J Rehabil Med, 36, pp. 7-8.
8. Wynia, K., Middel, B., van Dijk, J. P., de Ruiter, H., Lok, W., De Keyser, J. H. and Reijneveld, S. A. (2006) Broadening the scope on health problems among the chronically neurologically ill with the International Classification of Functioning. Disabil Rehabil, 28, pp. 1445-1454.
9. Kempen, G., Doeglas, D. and Suurmeijer, P. (1993) Groningen Activity Restriction Scale, Northern Centre for Health Care Research
10. Cardol, M., de Haan, R. J., Bos, G A van den, De Jong, B. A. and de Groot, I. J. (1999) The development of a handicap assessment questionnaire: The Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil, 13, pp. 411-419.
11. Cardol, M., de Haan, R. J., De Jong, B. A., van den Bos, G A and de Groot, I. J. (2001) Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, pp. 210-216.
12. Laman, H. and Lankhorst, G. J. (1994) Subjective weighting of disability: An approach to quality of life assessment in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil, 16, pp. 198-204.
13. Cohen, L., Pouwer, F., Pfennings, L. E., Lankhorst, G. J., van der Ploeg, H. M., Polman, C. H., Ader, H. J., Jonnson, A. and Vleugels, L. (1999) Factor structure of the Disability and Impact Profile in patients with multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res, 8, pp. 141-150.
14. World Health Organization (2002) Toward a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF, World Health Organization, Geneva
15. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill, New York
16. Streiner, D. and Norman, G. (2003) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, Oxford University Press, Oxford
17. Polit, D. F. and Beck, C. T. (2004) Nursing research. Principles and methods, Lippincott, Philadelphia
18. Briggs, S. R. and Cheek, J. M. (1986) The role of factor-analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Personality, 54, pp. 106-148.
19. Clark, L. A. and Watson, D. (1995) Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psycholog Assess, 7, pp. 309-319.
20. van Sonderen, E (2002) Omgaan met ontbrekende gegevens in het bijzonder bij schaal items (How to handle missing data in particular scale items). Verpleegkunde, Nederlands-Vlaams wetenschappelijk tijdschrift voor verpleegkundigen, 15, pp. 104-111.
21. Pfennings, L., Cohen, L., Miller, D., Gerbaud, L., Vleugels, L., Freeman, J., Vernay, D., Biolay, S., Ketelaer, P., Thompson, A., Polman, C. and van der Ploeg, H. (1999) Using the Short Form-36 with multiple sclerosis patients in five countries: A cross-cultural comparison. Psychol Rep, 85, pp. 19-31.
22. Ware, J. E. and Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 30, pp. 473-483.
23. Pfennings, L., Cohen, L., van der Ploeg, H., Polman, C. and Lankhorst, G. (1998) Reliability of two measures of health-related quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. Percept Mot Skills, 87, pp. 111-114.
24. The WHOQOL Group (1998) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psycholog Med, 28, pp. 551-558.
25. Trompenaars, F., Masthoff, E., Heck, G., Hodiamont, P. and Vries, J. (2005) Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. Qual Life Res, 14, pp. 151-160.
26. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, Academic Press, New York
27. Lublin, F. D. and Reingold, S. C. (1996) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: Results of an international survey. Neurology, 46, pp. 907-911.
28. Newcombe, R. G. and Altman, D. G. (2005) Proportions and their differences. Statistics with confidence, pp. 45-56. British Medical Journal, Bristol
29. Middel, B., Stewart, R., Bouma, J., van Sonderen, E. and Heuvel, W JA van den (2001) How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?. J Eval Clin Pract, 7, pp. 399-410.
30. Hobart, J. C., Riazi, A., Lamping, D. L., Fitzpatrick, R. and Thompson, A. J. (2004) Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: Development of a patient-based measure of outcome. Health Technol Assess, 8, pp. 1-60.
31. Hobart, J., Lamping, D., Fitzpatrick, R., Riazi, A. and Thompson, A. (2001) The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure. Brain, 124, pp. 962-973.
32. Cella, D. F., Dineen, K., Arnason, B., Reder, A., Webster, K. A., Karabatsos, G., Chang, C., Lloyd, S., Steward, J. and Stefoski, D. (1996) Validation of the functional assessment of multiple sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology, 47, pp. 129-139.
33. Vickrey, B. G., Hays, R. D., Harooni, R., Myers, L. W. and Ellison, G. W. (1995) A health-related quality of life measure for multiple sclerosis. Qual Life Res, 4, pp. 187-206.