Representation of heterogeneous material properties in the core product model

Engineering with Computers

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-58

  Biswas, Arpan ^a   Fenves, Steve J ^b   Shapiro, Vadim ^a   Sriram, Ram ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DESIGN; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

CONTINUOUSLY VARYING MATERIAL PROPERTIES; CORE PRODUCT MODEL; MATERIAL FIELDS;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 38649116933     PISSN: 01770667     EISSN: 14355663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-007-0065-y     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bendsoe M, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71:197-224
2. Ghosh A, Miyamoto Y, Reimanis I (1997) Functionally graded materials: manufacture, properties and applications. Ceram Trans 76:1-192
3. Suresh S, Mortensen A (1997) Fundamentals of functinally graded materials. The University Press, UK
4. Miyamoto Y, Kaysser WA, Rabin BH (eds) (1999) Functionally graded materials: Design, processing and applications. Kluwer, Boston
5. Siu YK, Tan ST (2002) Source-based heterogeneous solid modeling. Comput Aided Des 34:41-55
6. Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (1999) The unified modeling language user guide. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
7. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland (1994) ISO 10303-1:1994, Industrial automation systems and integration - product data representation and exchange - Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles
8. Owen J (1997) STEP: An introduction. Information Geometer, Wichster
9. Fenves S, Sriram R, Subrahmanian E, Rachuri S (2005) Product information exchange: Practices and standards. Trans ASME J Comput Inf Sci Eng 5(3):238-246
10. Fenves SJ (2001) A Core Product Model for representing design information, internal report NISTIR 6736. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD
11. Pratt MJ (2000) Modelling of material property variation for layered manufacturing. In: Mathematics of surfaces IX. Cambridge, UK
12. Pratt MJ, Bhatt AD, Dutta D, Lyons KW, Patil L, Sriram RD (2002) Progress towards an international standard for data transfer in rapid prototyping and layered manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 34(1):1111-1121
13. Patil L, Dutta D, Bhatt AD, Jurrens KK, Lyons KW, Pratt MJ, Sriram RD (2000) Representation of heterogeneous objects in ISO 10303. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Orlando, FL
14. Cho W, Sachs EM, Patrikalakis NM, Cima M, Liu H, Serdy J, Stratton CC (2002) Local composition control in solid freeform fabrication, In: Proceedings of the 2002 NSF design, service and manufacturing grantees and research conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico
15. Liu H, Cho W, Jackson TR, Patrikalakis NM, Sachs EM (2000) Algorithms for design and interrogation of functionally gradient material objects, In: Proceedings of ASME 2000 IDETC/CIE 2000 ASME design automation conference, Baltimore, MD
16. Jackson TR (2000) Analysis of functionally graded material object representation methods, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Ocean Engineering Department
17. Biswas A, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (2004) Heterogeneous material modeling with distance fields. Comput Aided Geom Des 22(3):215-242
18. Holt JB, Koizumi M, Hirai T, Munir ZA (eds) (1993) Ceramic transactions, vol 34. The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio
19. Chandru V, Manohar S, Prakash C (1995) Voxel-based modeling for layered manufacturing. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 27:42-47
20. Pegna J, Safi A (1998) CAD modeling of multi-model structures for freeform fabrication. In: Proceedings of the 1998 solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TX
21. Qian X, Dutta D (2001) Physics based B-Spline heterogeneous object modeling. In: ASME design engineering technical conference, Pittsburgh
22. Kumar V, Dutta D (1998) An approach to modeling and representation of heterogeneous objects. ASME J Mech Des 120:659-667
23. Kumar V, Burns D, Dutta D, Hoffmann C (1999) A framework for object modeling. Comput Aided Des 31:541-556
24. Shapiro V (2002) Solid modeling. In: Farin G, JHoschek, Kim MS (eds) Handbook of computer aided geometric design. Elsevier, Amsterdam
25. Requicha AAG (1980) Representations for rigid solids: Theory, methods, and systems. ACM Computing Surveys 12:437-464
26. Rvachev VL, Sheiko TI, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (2000) On completeness of RFM solution structures. Comput Mech 25:305-316
27. Rvachev VL, Sheiko TI, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (2001) Transfinite interpolation over implicitly defined sets. Comput Aided Geom Des 18:195-220
28. Lancaster P, Salkauskas K (1986) Curve and surface fitting: An introduction, Academic, New York
29. Hoscheck J, Lasser D (1993) Fudamentals of computer aided geometric design, ISBN 1-56881-007-5, A. K. Peters Ltd, Natick, MA, USA, pp 371-501
30. Rvachev VL, Sheiko TI, Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (1999) On completeness of RFM solution structure. Comput Mech J Meshf Methods 25:305-316
31. Kolmogorov AN, Fomin SV (1975) Introductory real analysis, Dover Publication Inc, New York
32. Biswas A, Shapiro V (2004) Approximate distance fields with non-vanishing gradients. Graph Models 66(3):133-159
33. Ricci A (1973) A constructive geometry for computer graphics. Comput J 16(2):157-160
34. Shapiro V (1994) Real functions for representation of rigid solids. Comput Aided Geom Des 11(2):153-175
35. Shapiro V, Tsukanov I (1999) Implicit functions with guaranteed differential properties, In: Proceedings of fifth ACM symposium on solid modeling and applications, Ann Arbor, MI
36. Rvachev VL (1982) Theory of R-functions and some applications, Naukova Dumka (in Russian)
37. Rockwood AP, Owen JC (1987) Blending surfaces in solid modeling. In: Farin GE (ed) Geometric modeling: Algorithms and new trends. SIAM, Philadelphia, pp 367-383
38. Rockwood AP (1989) The displacement method for implicit blending surfaces in solid models. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 8(4):279-297
39. Raviv A, Elber G (1999) Three dimensional freeform sculpting via zero sets of scalar trivariate functions. In: Proceedings of the fifth ACM symposium on solid modeling and applications. ACM Press, New York, pp 246-257
40. Esteve J, Brunet P, Vinacua A (2001) Multiresolution for algebraic curves and surfaces using wavelets. Comput Graph Forum 20(1):47-58
41. Savchenko VV, Pasko AA, Okunev OG, Kunii TL (1995) Function representation of solids reconstructed from scattered surface points and contours. Comput Graph Forum 14(4):181-188
42. Turk G, O'Brien JF (1999) Shape transformation using variational implicit functions, In: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, New York, NY, USA, pp 335-342
43. Kumar GVVR, Srinivasan P, Holla VD, Shastry KG, Prakash BG (2003) Geodesic curve computations on surfaces. Comput Aided Geom Des 20(2):119-133
44. Ahuja N, Chuang JH (1997) Shape representation using generalized potential field model. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(2):169-176
45. Bloomenthal J (1995) Bulge elimination in implicit surface blends. In: Implicit surfaces'95. Grenoble, France, pp 7-20
46. Sherstyuk A (1999) Kernel functions in convolution surfaces: A comparative analysis. Vis Comput 15(4):171-182
47. Koike Y (1992) Graded index materials and components. In: Hornak LA (ed) In polymers for lightwave and integrated optics. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (special contribution to this book)
48. Weiss L, Amon C, Finger S, Miller E, Romero D, Verdinelli I, Walker L, Campbell P (2005) Bayesian computer-aided experimental design and freeform fabrication of heterogeneous matrices for tissue engineering applications. Comput Aided Des 37(11):1127-1139
49. Tsukanov I, Shapiro V (2005) Meshfree Modeling and Analysis of Physical Fields in Heterogeneous Media. Adv Comput Math 23(1-2):95-124