User perspectives on mixed reality tabletop visualization for face-to-face collaborative design review

Automation in Construction

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 399-412

  Wang, Xiangyu ^a   Dunston, Phillip S ^b  

^a Faculty of Architecture Design and Planning   (Australia)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D models; Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW); Design review; Mixed reality; Usability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; FEEDBACK; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; USABILITY ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES; VISUALIZATION;

DESIGN REVIEW; HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; MIXED REALITY; VIRTUAL DESIGN;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 38649111297     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Campbell D.A. Architectural construction documents on the web: VRML as a case study. Automation in Construction 9 1 (2000) 129-138
2. Caneparo L. Shared virtual reality for design and management: the Porta Susa project. Automation in Construction 10 2 (2001) 217-228
3. Kolarevic B., Schmitt G., Hirschberg U., Kurmann D., and Johnson B. An experiment in design collaboration. Automation in Construction 9 1 (2000) 73-81
4. Retik A., and Shapira A. VR-based planning of construction site activities. Automation in Construction 8 6 (1999) 671-680
5. Waly A.F., and Thabet W.Y. A virtual construction environment for preconstruction planning. Automation in Construction 12 2 (2003) 139-154
6. Seichter H. Collaborative augmented sketching. Proc. of the 2nd IEEE AR Toolkit Workshop 2003, 7th October (2003), Waseda University, Tokyo 42-43
7. Henrysson A., Billinghurst M., and Ollila M. Face to face collaborative AR on mobile phones. Proc. of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'05), October 5-8, Vienna, Austria (2005) 80-89
8. Billinghurst M., Weghorst S., and Fumess T. Shared space: an augmented reality approach for computer supported collaborative work. Virtual Reality 3 1 (1998) 25-36
9. Regenbrecht H.T., and Wagner M.T. Interaction in a collaborative augmented reality environment. Proc. of CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM SIGCHI, April 20-25, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2002) 504-505
10. Raskar R., Welch G., and Chen W. Table-top spatially-augmented reality: bringing physical models to life with projected imagery. Proc. of Second IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR) '99, Oct 20-21 (1999), Cathedral Hill Hotel, San Francisco, USA 64-71
11. Broll W., Stoerring M., and Mottram C. The augmented round table - a new interface to urban planning and architectural design. In: Rauterberg M., et al. (Ed). Proc. of International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT'03 (September 1-5 2003), IOS Press, Zurich, Switzerland 1103-1104
12. Breen J., Nottrot R., and Stellingwerff M. Tangible virtuality-perceptions of computer-aided and physical modeling. Automation in Construction 12 6 (2003) 649-653
13. Hovestadt V., and Hovestadt L. The ARMILLA project. Automation in Construction 8 3 (1999) 325-337
14. Malkawi A.M., and Srinivasan R.S. A new paradigm for human-building interaction: the use of CFD and augmented reality. Automation in Construction 14 1 (2005) 71-84
15. Wang X., and Dunston P.S. Compatibility issues in augmented reality systems for AEC: an experimental prototype study. Automation in Construction 15 3 (2006) 314-326
16. Franz G., von der Heyde M., and Bülthoff H.H. An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality-exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces. Automation in Construction 14 2 (2005) 165-172
17. Westerdahl B., Suneson K., Wernemyr C., Roupé M., Johansson M., and Allwood C.M. Users' evaluation of a virtual reality architectural model compared with the experience of the completed building. Automation in Construction 15 2 (2006) 150-165
18. Hix D., Swan J., Gabbard J., McGee M., Durbin J., and King T. User-centered design and evaluation of a real-time battlefield visualization virtual environment. Proc. of IEEE Virtual Reality (1999) 96-103
19. Bowman D., Johnson D.B., and Hodges L.F. Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 1 (2001) 75-95
20. Bowman D., Hodges L., and Bolter J. The virtual venue: user-computer interaction in information-rich virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 5 (1998) 478-493
21. Gabbard J.L., Hix D., and Swan J.E. User-centered design and evaluation of virtual environments. Proc. of IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (November/December 1999) 2-10
22. Hinckley K., Tullio I., Pausch R., Profin D., and Kassell N. Usability analysis of 3D rotation techniques. Proc. of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (1997) 1-10
23. Dias M., Jorge J., Carvalho J., Santos P., and Luzio J. Usability evaluation of tangible user interfaces for augmented reality. Proc. of the 2nd IEEE AR Toolkit Workshop 2003, 7th October (2003), Waseda University, Tokyo 54-61
24. Paelke V., Stocklein J., Reimann C., and Rosenbach W. Supporting user interface evaluation of AR presentation and interaction techniques with ARToolkit. Proc. of the Second IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, 7 Oct., Tokyo, Japan, Nishi-Waseda Campus (2003), Waseda University 35-41
25. Regenbrecht H.T., and Schubert T. Measuring presence in augmented reality environments: design and a first test of a questionnaire. Proc. of the Fifth Annual International Workshop Presence 2002, Porto, Portugal (October 9-11 2002)
26. Tang C., Owen F., Biocca W., and Mou. Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. Proc. of CHI 2003, April 5-10, Ft. Lauderdale Florida, USA (2003) 73-80
27. Kato H., Billinghurst M., Paupyrev I., Imamoto K., and Tachibana. Virtual object manipulation on a table-top AR environment. Proc. of International Symposium on Augmented Reality, IEEE and ACM, October 5-6 (2000) 111-119
28. Seichter H., and Kvan T. Tangible interfaces in design computing. In: Rüdiger B., Tournay B., and Ørbaek H. (Eds). Proc. of ECAADe 22 (2004), The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Copenhagen 159-166
29. Shelton B.E., and Hedley N.E. Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. Proc. of the First EEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, Darmstadt Germany (September 29 2002) 8 pages
30. Klinker G., Dutoit A., and Bauer M. Fata Morgana - a presentation system for product design. Proc. of 2002 International Symposium on Mixed Reality, Darmstadt (2002) 76-85
31. Issa R., Fukai D., and Danso-Amoako M.O. Evaluation of computer anatomic modeling for analyzing pre-construction problems. CD Proc. of ASCE 2003 Construction Research Congress, March 19-21, Honolulu, Hawaii (2003) 8 pages
32. J.R. Anderson, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, Worth Publishers and W. H. Freeman, New York, NY, 1980.
33. Taylor H.A., and Tversky B. Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory & Language 35 (1996) 371-391
34. Oxman R. Design media for the cognitive designer. Automation in Construction 9 4 (2000) 337-346
35. Sholl M.J. The representation and retrieval of map and environment knowledge. Geographical Systems 2 (1995) 177-195
36. Tversky P., Lee S., and Mainwaring. Why do speakers mix perspectives. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1 4 (1999) 399-412
37. X. Wang, Applications of Mixed Reality technology in architecture, engineering and construction: specification, prototype, and evaluation, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, 2005.
38. Wang X., and Dunston P.S. System evaluation of a Mixed Reality-based collaborative prototype for mechanical design review collaboration. CD Proc. of 2005 ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, July 12-15, Cancun, Mexico (2005)