High resolution image in bone biology II. Review of the literature

Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Cano Sánchez, Jorge ^a,c   Campo, Julián ^a   Vaquero, Juan José ^b   Martínez González, Jose María ^a   Bascones, Antonio ^a  

^a UCM

^b HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bone biology; High resolution image; Virtual biopsy

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; BONE REGENERATION; BONE REMODELING; BONE STRUCTURE; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAXILLA; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; REVIEW; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 38549177863     PISSN: 16984447     EISSN: 16986946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Van der Meulen MC, Huiskes R. Why mechanobiology. A survey article. J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):401-14.
2. Odgaard A. Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. Bone. 1997 Apr;20(4):315-28.
3. Van Rietbergen B. Micro-FE analyses of bone: state of the art. In: Majumbar S, Bay BK, editors. Noninvasive assessment of trabecular bonearchitecture and the competence of bone. New York: Kluwer academic-Plenum Publishers; 2001 .p. 21-30.
4. Van Eijden TM, Van Ruijven LJ, Giesen EB. Bone tissue stiffness in the mandibular condyle is dependent on the direction and density of the cancellous structure. Calcif Tissue Int. 2004 Dec;75(6):502-8.
5. Ulrich D, Rietbergen B, Laib A, Rüegsegger P. Mechanical analysis of bone and its microarchitecture based on in vivo voxel images. Technol Health Care. 1998 Dec;6(5-6):421-7.
6. Takada H, Abe S, Tamatsu Y, Mitarashi S, Saka H, Ide Y. Three-dimensional bone microstructures of the mandibular angle using microCT and finite element analysis: relationship between partially impacted mandibular third molars and angle fractures. Dent Traumatol. 2006 Feb;22(1):18-24.
7. McNamara LM, Van der Linden JC, Weinans H, Prendergast PJ. Stress-concentrating effect of resorption lacunae in trabecular bone. J Biomech. 2006;39(4):734-41.
8. Carter DR, Caler WE, Spengler DM, Frankel VH. Fatigue behavior of adult cortical bone: the influence of mean strain and strain range. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981 Oct;52(5):481-90.
9. Nicholson PH, Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Davie MW, Dequeker J, et al. Structural and material mechanical properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. Med Eng Phys. 1997 Dec;19(8):729-37.
10. Cano-Sánchez J, Campo-Trapero J, Gonzalo-Lafuente JC, Moreno-López LA, Bascones-Martínez A. Undecalcified bone samples: a description of the technique and its utility based on the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005 Apr 1;10 Suppl 1:E74-87.
11. Borah B, Dufresne TE, Ritman EL, Jorgensen SM, Liu S, Chmielewski PA, et al. Long-term risedronate treatment normalizes mineralization and continues to preserve trabecular architecture: sequential triple biopsy studies with micro-computed tomography. Bone. 2006 Aug;39(2):345-52.
12. Müller R, Gerber SC, Hayes WC. Micro-compression: a novel technique for the nondestructive assessment of local bone failure. Technol Health Care. 1998 Dec;6(5-6):433-44.
13. Thurner PJ, Wyss P, Voide R, Stauber M, Stampanoni M, Sennhauser U, et al. Time-lapsed investigation of three-dimensional failure and damage accumulation in trabecular bone using synchrotron light. Bone. 2006 Aug;39(2):289-99.
14. Bernhardt R, Scharnweber D, Müller B, Thurner P, Schliephake H, Wyss P, et al. Comparison of microfocus- and synchrotron X-ray tomography for the analysis of osteointegration around Ti6Al4V implants. Eur Cell Mater. 2004 Jun 30;7:42-51.
15. Gabet Y, Müller R, Levy J, Dimarchi R, Chorev M, Bab I, et al. Parathyroid hormone 1-34 enhances titanium implant anchorage in low-density trabecular bone: a correlative micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical analysis. Bone. 2006 Aug;39(2):276-82.
16. Jones AC, Sakellariou A, Limaye A, Arns CH, Senden TJ, Sawkins T, et al. Investigation of microstructural features in regenerating bone using micro computed tomography. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004 Apr;15(4):529-32.
17. Shefelbine SJ, Simon U, Claes L, Gold A, Gabet Y, Bab I, et al. Prediction of fracture callus mechanical properties using micro-CT images and voxel-based finite element analysis. Bone. 2005 Mar;36(3):480-8.
18. Huh KH, Yi WJ, Jeon IS, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, et al. Relationship between two-dimensional and three-dimensional bone architecture in predicting the mechanical strength of the pig mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Mar;101(3):363-73.
19. Choël L, Last D, Duboeuf F, Seurin MJ, Lissac M, Briguet A, et al. Trabecular alveolar bone microarchitecture in the human mandible using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 May;33(3):177-82.
20. Dalstra M, Verna C, Cacciafesta V, Andreassen TT, Melsen B. Microcomputed tomography to evaluate bone remodelling and mineralization . In: Majumbar S, Bay BK, eds. Noninvasive assessment of trabecular bone architecture and the competence of bone. New York: Kluwer academic-Plenum Publishers; 2001 .p. 9-19.
21. Maréchal M, Luyten F, Nijs J, Postnov A, Schepers E, Van Steenberghe D. Histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography of bone augmentation under a titanium membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):708-14.
22. Moon HS, Won YY, Kim KD, Ruprecht A, Kim HJ, Kook HK, et al. The three-dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible. Surg Radiol Anat. 2004 Dec;26(6):466-73.
23. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 199-209.
24. Stoppie N, Pattijn V, Van Cleynenbreugel T, Wevers M, Vander Sloten J, Ignace N. Structural and radiological parameters for the characterization of jawbone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Apr;17(2):124-33.
25. Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S, Bresin A, Ammann P. Effect of different masticatory functional and mechanical demands on the structural adaptation of the mandibular alveolar bone in young growing rats. Bone. 2004 Jul;35(1):191-7.
26. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, Newitt DC, Link TM, Lin JC, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone. 1998 May;22(5):445-54.
27. Hsieh J, Molthen RC, Dawson CA, Johnson RH. An iterative approach to the beam hardening correction in cone beam CT. Med Phys. 2000 Jan;27(1):23-9.
28. Verna C, Dalstra M, Lee TC, Melsen B. Microdamage in porcine alveolar bone due to functional and orthodontic loading. Eur J Morphol. 2005 Feb-Apr;42(1-2):3-11.
29. Nevins ML, Camelo M, Rebaudi A, Lynch SE, Nevins M. Three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic evaluation of periodontal regeneration: a human report of intrabony defects treated with Bio-Oss collagen. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Aug;25(4):365-73.
30. Trisi P, Rebaudi A, Calvari F, Lazzara RJ. Sinus graft with biogran, autogenous bone, and PRP: a report of three cases with histology and micro-CT. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006 Apr;26(2):113-25.