Outcomes of Same-Sizing versus Oversizing Donor Trephines in Keratoconic Patients Undergoing First Penetrating Keratoplasty

Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 268-275

  Jaycock, Philip D ^a   Jones, Mark N A ^b   Males, John ^c   Armitage, W John ^d   Cook, Stuart D ^a   Tole, Derek M ^a   Kaye, Stephen B ^e  

^a BRISTOL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UK Transplant   (United Kingdom)

^c SYDNEY EYE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; DONOR; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOCONUS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CORNEA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KERATOCONUS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 38549165618     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.051     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Mamalis N., Anderson C.W., Kreisler K.R., et al. Changing trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 110 (1992) 1409-1411
2. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry: 1990 to 1992 report. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 21 suppl (1993) 1-14
3. Kirkness C.M., Ficker L.A., Steele A.S., and Rice N.S. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye 4 (1990) 673-688
4. Price Jr. F.W., Whitson W.E., and Marks R.G. Progression of visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 1177-1185
5. Williams K.A., Roder D., Esterman A., et al. Factors predictive of corneal graft survival: report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. Ophthalmology 99 (1992) 403-414
6. Vail A., Gore S.M., Bradley B.A., et al. Corneal transplantation in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol 77 (1993) 650-656
7. Legeais J.M., Parc C., d'Hermies F., et al. Nineteen years of penetrating keratoplasty in the Hotel-Dieu Hospital in Paris. Cornea 20 (2001) 603-606
8. Kang P.C., Klintworth G.K., Kim T., et al. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1980-2001. Cornea 24 (2005) 801-803
9. Williams K.A., Muehlberg S.M., Lewis R.F., and Coster D.J. How successful is corneal transplantation?. A report from the Australian Corneal Graft Register. Eye 9 (1995) 219-227
10. Foulks G.N., Perry H.D., and Dohlman C.H. Oversize corneal donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 86 (1979) 490-494
11. Olson R.J. Variation in corneal graft size related to trephine technique. Arch Ophthalmol 97 (1979) 1323-1325
12. Troutman R.C. Astigmatic considerations in corneal graft. Ophthalmic Surg 10 (1979) 21-26
13. Pflugfelder S.C., Roussel T.J., Denham D., et al. Photogrammetric analysis of corneal trephination. Arch Ophthalmol 110 (1992) 1160-1166
14. Perlman E.M. Unusual refractive errors induced by interchanging trephines during penetrating keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg 5 (1989) 271-273
15. Bourne W.M., Davison J.A., and O'Fallon W.M. The effects of oversize donor buttons on postoperative intraocular pressure and corneal curvature in aphakic penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 89 (1982) 242-246
16. Perry H.D., and Foulks G.N. Oversize donor buttons in corneal transplantation surgery for keratoconus. Ophthalmic Surg 18 (1987) 751-752
17. Wilson S.E., and Bourne W.M. Effect of recipient-donor trephine size disparity on refractive error in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 96 (1989) 299-305
18. Duran J.A., Malvar A., and Diez E. Corneal dioptric power after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 73 (1989) 657-660
19. Javadi M.A., Mohammadi M.J., Mirdehghan S.A., and Sajjadi S.H. A comparison between donor-recipient corneal size and its effect on the ultimate refractive error induced in keratoconus. Cornea 12 (1993) 401-405
20. Goble R.R., Hardman Lea S.J., and Falcon M.G. The use of same size host and donor trephine in penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye 8 (1994) 311-314
21. Doyle S.J., Harper C., Marcyniuk B., and Ridgway A.E. Prediction of refractive outcome in penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea 15 (1996) 441-445
22. Spadea L., Bianco G., Mastrofini M.C., and Balestrazzi E. Penetrating keratoplasty with donor and recipient corneas of the same diameter. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 27 (1996) 425-430
23. Serdarevic O.N., Renard G.J., and Pouliquen Y. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: role of videokeratoplasty and trephine sizing. J Cataract Refract Surg 22 (1996) 1165-1174
24. Girard L.J., Esnaola N., Rao R., et al. Use of grafts smaller than the opening for keratoconic myopia and astigmatism: a prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 18 (1992) 380-384
25. Busin M., Zambianchi L., Franceschelli F., et al. Intraoperative cauterization of the cornea can reduce postkeratoplasty refractive error in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 1524-1529
26. Shimmura S., Ando M., Ishioka M., et al. Same-sized donor corneas for myopic keratoconus. Cornea 23 (2004) 345-349
27. Lanier J.D., Bullington Jr. R.H., and Prager T.C. Axial length in keratoconus. Cornea 11 (1992) 250-254
28. Tuft S.J., Fitzke F.W., and Buckley R.J. Myopia following penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 76 (1992) 642-645
29. Troutman R.C., and Gaster R.N. Surgical advances and results of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 90 (1980) 131-136
30. Musch D.C., Meyer R.F., and Sugar A. The effect of removing running sutures on astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 106 (1988) 488-492
31. Mader T.H., Yuan R., Lynn M.J., et al. Changes in keratometric astigmatism after suture removal more than one year after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 100 (1993) 119-127
32. Confino J., and Brown S.I. Bacterial endophthalmitis associated with exposed monofilament sutures following corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol 99 (1985) 111-113
33. Dana M.R., Goren M.B., Gomes J.A., et al. Suture erosion after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea 14 (1995) 243-248
34. Busin M., Monks T., and al-Nawaiseh I. Different suturing techniques variously affect the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 1200-1205
35. Filatov V., Alexandrakis G., Talamo J.H., and Steinert R.F. Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted sutures. Am J Ophthalmol 122 (1996) 696-700
36. Sharif K.W., and Casey T.A. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: complications and long-term success. Br J Ophthalmol 75 (1991) 142-146
37. Irvine A.R., and Kaufman H.E. Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 68 (1969) 835-844
38. Zimmerman T., Olson R., Waltman S., and Kaufman H. Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure; post-keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 96 (1978) 2231-2233