Prediction of refractive outcome in penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus

Cornea

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 441-445

  Doyle, S J ^a   Harper, C ^a   Marcyniuk, B ^a   Ridgway, A E A ^a  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biometry; Keratoconus; Keratoplasty; Vitreous length

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; KERATOCONUS; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VITREOUS BODY;

EID: 0029741355     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003226-199609000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kirkness CM, Ficker LA, Steele AS, Rice NS. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye 1990;4:673-88.
2. Price FW Jr, Whitson WE, Marks RG. Progression of visual acuity after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:1177-85.
3. Sayegh FN, Ehlers N, Farah I. Evaluation of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Nine years follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol 1988;66:400-3.
4. Sharif KW, Casey TA. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: complications and long term success. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:142-6.
5. Troutman RC, Lawless MA. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea 1987;6:298-305.
6. Troutman RC, Meltzer M. Astigmatism and myopia in keratoconus. Trans Am Ophth Soc 1972;70:265-77.
7. Brooks AMV, Robertson IF, Mahoney AM. Ocular rigidity and intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Aust J Ophthalmol 1984;12:317-24.
8. Lavery GW, Lindstrom RL, Hofer LA, Doughman DJ. The surgical management of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg 1985;16:165-9.
9. Coster DJ. Some factors which affect the visual outcome of corneal transplantation. The Montgomery lecture. Eye 1991; 5:265-78.
10. Foulks GN, Perry HD, Dohlman CH. Oversized corneal donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1979; 86:490-4.
11. Olson RJ. Variation in corneal graft size related to trephine technique. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1807-11.
12. Troutman RC. Astigmatic considerations in corneal graft. Ophthalmic Surg 1979;10:21-6.
13. Binkhorst RD. The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye. Ophthal Surg 1981;12:363-5
14. Lanier JD, Bullington Jr RH, Prager TC. Axial length in keratoconus. Cornea 1992;11:250-4.
15. Tuft SJ, Fitzke FW, Buckley RJ. Myopia following penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76: 642-5.
16. Girard LJ, Esnaola N, Rao R, et al. Use of grafts smaller than the opening for keratoconic myopia and astigmatism. A prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:380-4.
17. Wilson EW, Bourne WM. Effect of recipient-donor trephine size disparity on refractive error in keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1989;96:299-304.
18. Girard LJ, Eguez I, Esnaola N, et al. Effect of penetrating keratoplasty using grafts of various sizes on keratoconic myopia and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988;14: 541-7.
19. Javadi MA, Mohammadi MJ, Mirdehghan SA, et al. A comparison between donor-recipient corneal size and its effect on the ultimate refractive error induced in keratoconus. Cornea 1993;12:401-5.
20. Goble RR, Hardman Lea SJ, Falcon MG. The use of the same size host and donor trephine in penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye 1994;8(pt 3):311-4.
21. Ohmi G, Kinoshita S, Matsuda M, et al. Insufficient accommodation in patients with keratoconus. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 1990;94:186-9.