Breakdown evaluation of corneal epithelial barrier caused by antiallergic eyedrops using an electrophysiologic method

Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-51

  Nakashima, Mikiro ^a   Nakamura, Tadahiro ^b   Teshima, Mugen ^b   To, Hideto ^b   Uematsu, Masafumi ^a   Kitaoka, Takashi ^a   Taniyama, Kotaro ^a   Nishida, Koyo ^a   Nakamura, Junzo ^a   Sasaki, Hitoshi ^b  

^a NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIALLERGIC AGENT; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; CROMOGLYCATE DISODIUM; EYE DROPS; FEPRAZONE; IBUDILAST; KETOTIFEN FUMARATE; LEVOCABASTINE; PEMIROLAST; PRESERVATIVE; TRANILAST;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL LINE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CYTOTOXICITY; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EPITHELIUM CELL; EVALUATION; EXCISION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LACRIMAL FLUID; MALE; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; SKIN DEFECT;

ANIMALS; ANTI-ALLERGIC AGENTS; BENZALKONIUM COMPOUNDS; BLOOD-RETINAL BARRIER; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; DIFFUSION CHAMBERS, CULTURE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; MALE; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PRESERVATIVES, PHARMACEUTICAL; RABBITS;

EID: 38549123862     PISSN: 10807683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2007.0006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Becquet, F., Goldschild, M., Moldovan, M.S., et al. Histopathological effects of topical ophthalmic preservatives on rat corneoconjunctival surface. Curr. Eye Res. 17:419-425, 1998.
2. Klyce, S.D. Electrical profiles in the corneal epithelium. J. Physiol. 226:407-429, 1972.
3. Nakashima, M., Murata, S., Sakanaka, K., et al. Electrophysiological study for estimation of corneal epithelial disorders after instillation of antiglaucomatous eyedrops. In The 2nd World Congress of the Board of Pharmaceutical Sciences of FIP. Kyoto: abstracts, 2004:394.
4. Chrai, S.S., Patton, T.F., Mehta, A., et al. Lacrimal and instilled fluid dynamics in rabbit eyes. J. Pharm. Sci. 62:1112-1121, 1973.
5. Chrai, S.S., Makoid, M.C., Eriksen, S.P., et al. Drop size and initial dosing frequency problems of topically applied ophthalmic drugs. J. Pharm. Sci. 63:333-338, 1974.
6. Schoenwald, R.D., and Huang, H.S. Corneal penetration behavior of beta-blocking agents I: Physicochemical factors. J. Pharm. Sci. 72:1266-1272, 1983.
7. Suzuki, K., Saito, J., Yanai, R., et al. Cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions during corneal epithelial wound healing. Prog. Ret. Eye Res. 22:113-133, 2003.
8. Klyce, S.D. Relationship of epithelial membrane potentials to corneal potential. Exp. Eye Res. 15:567-575, 1973.
9. Kruszewski, F.H., Walker, T.L., and DiPasquale, L.C. Evaluation of a human corneal epithelial cell line as an in vitro model for assessing ocular irritation. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 36:130-140, 1997.
10. Huang A.J., Tseng S.C., and Kenyon K.R. Paracellular permeability of corneal and conjunctival epithelia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30: 684-689, 1989.
11. Buret A.G., Mitchell K., Muench D.G., et al. Giardia lamblia disrupts tight junctional ZO-1 and increases permeability in nontransformed human small intestinal epithelial monolayers: Effects of epidermal growth factor. Parasitology 125:9-11, 2002.
12. Kawazu, K., Yamada, K., Nakamura, M., et al. Characterization of cyclosporin A transport in cultured rabbit corneal epithelial cells: p-glycoprotein transport activity and binding to cyclophilin. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40:1738-1744, 1999.
13. Sasaki H., Ichikawa M., Kawakami S., et al. In situ ocular absorption of tilisolol through ocular membranes in albino rabbits. J. Pharm. Sci. 85:940-943, 1996.
14. Rojanasakul, Y., Wang, L.Y., Bhat, M., et al. The transport barrier of epithelia: A comparative study on membrane permeability and charge selectivity in the rabbit. Pharm. Res. 9:1029-1034, 1992.
15. Sasaki, H., Yamamura, K., Nishida, K., et al. Delivery of drugs to the eye by topical application. Prog. Ret. Eye Res. 15:583-620, 1996.
16. Nishida, T., Sawa, M., Miyata, K., et al. Clinical classification of the corneal epithelial disorders. Rinsho Ganka 46:738-743, 1992.
17. Burstein, N.L., and Klyce, S.D. Electrophysiologic and morphologic effects of ophthalmic preparations on rabbit cornea epithelium. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 16:899-911, 1977.
18. Moore, R., Carlson, S., and Madara, J.L. Rapid barrier restitution in an in vitro model of intestinal epithelial injury. Lab. Invest. 60:237-244, 1989.
19. Green, K. The effects of preservatives on corneal permeability of drugs. In: Edman, P., ed. Biopharmaceutics of Ocular Drug Delivery. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1993:43-59.
20. Debbasch, C., Brignole, F., Pisella, P.J., et al. Quaternary ammoniums and other preservatives' contribution in oxidative stress and apoptosis on Chang conjunctival cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 42:642-652, 2001.
21. Pisella, P.J., Pouliquen, P., and Baudouin, C. Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative-free glaucoma medication. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 86:418-423, 2002.
22. Wang, Y.D., Kashiwagi, K., Chen, H.B., et al. Effects of isopropyl unoprostone ophthalmic solution on cultured rabbit corneal epithelial cells. Ophthalmologica 215:229-234, 2001.