|
Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 12-14
|
Should macular erythema reactions be counted as positive allergic patch-test reactions?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
2 BROMO 2 BROMOMETHYLGLUTARONITRILE;
2 PHENOXYETHANOL;
ALLERGEN;
BALSAM PERU;
BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE;
COBALT CHLORIDE;
DICHROMATE POTASSIUM;
FRAGRANCE;
HOUSE DUST ALLERGEN;
METHYLDIBROMOGLUTARONITRILE PHENOXYETHANOL;
NEOMYCIN;
NICKEL SULFATE;
SODIUM AUROTHIOSULFATE;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
ARTICLE;
ERYTHEMA;
HUMAN;
MACULAR ERYTHEMA;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
NORTH AMERICAN CONTACT DERMATITIS GROUP SCALE;
PAPULE;
PATCH TEST;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
PREVALENCE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RATING SCALE;
SCORING SYSTEM;
SCREENING;
SKIN ALLERGY;
SKIN ULCER;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
ALLERGENS;
COHORT STUDIES;
DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
ERYTHEMA;
FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS;
FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PATCH TESTS;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK FACTORS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 33645955894
PISSN: 17103568
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2310/6620.2006.05020 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (23)
|
References (4)
|