CO2-induced suppression of transpiration cannot explain increasing runoff

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 311-314

  Huntington, Thomas G ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38549083325     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6925     Document Type: Note

References (41)

1. Ainsworth EA, Long SP. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytologist 165: 351-372.
2. Baldocchi D, Wong S. 2006. An assessment of impacts of future CO2 and climate on agriculture. California Climate Change Center, Report No.CEC-500-2005-187-SF, California Energy Commission, 34p.
3. Berbery EG, Barros VR. 2002. The hydrologic cycle of the La plata basin in South America. Journal of Hydrometeorology 3: 630-645.
4. Brutsaert W. 2006. Indications of increasing land surface evaporation during the second half of the 20th century. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L20403, DOI:10.1029/2006GL027532.
5. Brutsaert W, Parlange MB. 1998. Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox. Nature 396: 30.
6. Bunn AG, Scott J, Goetz SJ, Kimball JS, Zhang K. 2007. Northern high-latitude ecosystems respond to climate change. EOS Transactions-American Geophysical Union 88(34): 333-335.
7. Dai A. 2006. Recent climatology, variability, and trends in global surface humidity. Journal of Climate 19: 3589-3606.
8. Dirmeyer PA, Brubaker KL. 2006. Evidence for trends in the Northern Hemisphere water cycle. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L14712, DOI:10.1029/2006GL026359.
9. Drake B, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Long SP. 1997. More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48: 609-639.
10. Field CB, Jackson RB, Mooney RA. 1995. Stomatal response to increased CO2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant Cell and Environment 18: 1214-1225,
11. Frich P, Alexander LV, Delia-Marta P, Gleason B, Haylock M, Klein-Tank AMG, Peterson TC. 2002. Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Climate Research 19: 193-212.
12. Garcia NO, Mechoso CR. 2006. Variability in the discharge of South American rivers and in climate. Hydrological Sciences Journal 50: 459-478.
13. Gedney N, Cox PM, Bletts RA, Boucher O, Huntingford C, Stott PA. 2006. Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records. Nature 439: 835-838.
14. Golubev VS, Lawrimore JH, Groisman PY, Speranskaya NA, Zhuravin SA, Menne MJ, Peterson TC, Malone RW. 2001. Evaporation changes over the contiguous United States and the former USSR: a reassessment. Geophysical Research Letters 28: 2665-2668.
15. Held IM, Soden Bj. 2006. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. Journal of Climate 19: 5686-5699.
16. Hobbins MT, Ramirez JA, Brown TC. 2004. Trends in pan evaporation and actual evapotranspiration across the conterminous U.S.: paradoxical or complementary? Geophysical Research Letters 31: L13503, DOI:10.1029/2004GL019846.
17. 2 enrichment in a scrub oak woodland. Ecology 87: 26-40.
18. Huntington TG. 2006. Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. Journal of Hydrology 319: 83-95.
19. 2 enrichment. Global Change Biology 5: 493-495.
20. Idso SB, Brazel AJ. 1984. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations may increase streamflow. Nature 312: 51-53.
21. Izaurralde RC, Rosenberg NJ, Brown RA, Thomson AM. 2003. Integrated assessment of Hadley Center (HadCM2) climate-change impacts on agricultural productivity and irrigation water supply in the conterminous United States: Part II. Regional agricultural production in 2030 and 2095. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 117: 97-122.
22. Kahler DM, Brutsaert W. 2006. Complementary relationship between daily evaporation in the environment and pan evaporation. Water Resources Research 42: W05413, DO1:10.1029/2005WR004541.
23. Kirschbaum MUF. 2004. Soil respiration under prolonged soil warming: are rate reductions caused by acclimation or substrate loss? Global Change Biology 10: 1870-1877.
24. Körner C. 2006. Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytologist 172: 393-411.
25. Kunkel KE, Easterling DR, Hubbard K, Redmond K. 2004. Temporal variations in frost-free season in the United States: 1895-2000. Geophysical Research Letters 31: L03201, DOI:10.1029/ 2003GL018624.
26. 2 concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiology 140: 779-790.
27. Lewis JD, Lucash M, Olszyk DM, Tingey DT. 2002. Stomatal responses of Douglas-fir seedlings to elevated carbon dioxide and temperature during the third and fourth years of exposure. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 1411-1421.
28. Lins HF, Slack JR. 1999. Streamflow trends in the United States. Geophysical Research Letters 26: 227-230.
29. 2 concentrations. Science 312: 1918-1921.
30. Menzel A, Fabian P. 1999. Growing season extended in Europe. Nature 397: 659.
31. Milly PCD, Dunne KA. 2001. Trends in evaporation and surface cooling in the Mississippi River-basin. Geophysical Research Letters 28: 1219-1222.
32. Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD. 2004. Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2-do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist 162: 253-280.
33. Peterson BJ, Holmes RM, McClelland JW, Vorosmarty CJ, Lammers RB, Shiklomanov AI, Shiklomanov IA, Rahmstorf S. 2002. Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean. Science 298: 2171-2173.
34. Shaw RW, Zavaleta ES, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Mooney HA, Field CB. 2002. Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298: 1987-1990.
35. Szilagyi J, Katul GG, Parlange MB. 2002. Evapotranspiration intensifies over the conterminous United States. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-ASCE 127: 354-362.
36. Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje P, Bojariu R, Easterling D, Klein Tank A, Parker D, Rahimzadeh F, Renwick JA, Rusticucci M, Soden B, Zhai P. 2007. Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, New York, USA.
37. Walter MT, Wilks DS, Parlange J-Y, Schneider RL. 2004. Increasing evapotranspiration from the conterminous United States. Journal of Hydrometeorology 5: 405-408.
38. Walther G-P, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389-395.
39. Wang K-Y, Kellomäki S, Li C, Zha T. 2003. Light and water-use efficiencies of pine shoots exposed to elevated carbon dioxide and temperature. Annals of Botany 92: 53-64.
40. Wolfe DW, Schwartz MD, Lakso AN, Otsuki Y, Pool RM, Shaulis NJ. 2005. Climate change and shifts in spring phenology of three horticultural woody perennials in northeastern USA. International Journal of Biometeorology 49: 303-309.
41. Zhou L, Kaufmann RK, Tian Y, Tucker CJ, Myneni RB. 2003. Relation between interannual variations in satellite measurements of northern forest greenness and climate between 1982 and 1999. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 108(D): 4004, DOI:10.1029/ 2002JD002510.