Cattell-horn-carroll cognitive abilities and reading achievement

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 27-41

  Benson, Nicholas ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Cognitive ability; Educational measurement; Psychological assessment; Reading; School psychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 38549083081     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282907301424     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Alfonso, V.C., Flanagan, D.P., & Radwan, S. (2005). The impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory on test development and interpretation of cognitive and academic abilities. In D. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2 nd ed., pp. 185-202). New York: Guilford.
3. Arbuckle, J.L. (2003). Amos 5.0 [Computer software]. Chicago: Smallwaters.
4. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5. Bowers, P.G., & Ishaik, G. (2003). RAN's contribution to understanding reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 140-157). New York: Guilford.
6. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2 nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Evans, J., Floyd, R., McGrew, K., & Leforgee, M. (2002). The relations between measures of Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) cognitive abilities and reading achievement during childhood and adolescence. School Psychology Review, 31, 246-262.
10. Glutting, J.J., Watkins, M.W., Konold, T.R., & McDermott, P.A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 103-114.
11. Horn, J.L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In D. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53-91). New York: Guilford.
12. Hoyle, R.H., & Panter, A.T. (1995). Writing about structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. International Reading Association and National Association for the Education of Young Children (1998). Learning to read and write: Developmentally appropriate practices for young children. Newark, DE: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
14. Jreskog, K.G., & Srbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Kavale, K.A., Fuchs, D., & Scruggs, T.E. (1994). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: Implications for policymaking. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 70-77.
16. Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
17. Konold, T.R., Juel, C., & McKinnon, M. (1999). Building an integrated model of early reading acquisition (CIERA Rep. No. 1-003). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, School of Education, Center for the Improvement of early Reading Acquisition.
18. Long, J.S. (1983). Covariance structure models: An introduction to Lisrel. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. MacCallum, R.C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures strategies and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Mather, N. (1991). An instructional guide to the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
21. McGrew, K.S. (1993). The relationship between the WJ-R Gf-Gc cognitive clusters and reading achievement across the life-span. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Monograph Series WJ-R, 39-53.
22. McGrew, K.S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151-180). New York: Guilford.
23. McGrew, K.S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2 nd ed., pp. 136-181). New York: Guilford.
24. McGrew, K.S., & Flanagan, D.P. (1998). The intelligent test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25. McGrew, K.S., & Woodcock, R.W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
26. Perie, M., Grigg, W.S., & Donahue, P.L. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-451). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
27. Seigel, L.S. (2003). Basic cognitive processes and reading disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 158-181). New York: Guilford.
28. Steiger, J.H., & Lind, J.C. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society Annual Meeting, Iowa City, IA.
29. U.S. Department of Education (2004). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
30. Vanderwood, M.L., McGrew, K.S., Flanagan, D.P., & Keith, T.Z. (2002). The contribution of general and specific cognitive abilities to reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 159-188.
31. Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
32. Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24, 4-12.