Ethnic and gender differences in science graduation at selective colleges with implications for admission policy and college choice

Research in Higher Education

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 353-381

  Smyth, Frederick L ^a   McArdle, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Affirmative action; College selectivity; Engineering; Gender; Mathematics; Minorities; SAT; Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843152908     PISSN: 03610365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:RIHE.0000027391.05986.79     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adair, R. K. (1991). Using quantitative measures to predict persistence in the natural sciences. College and University Fall: 73-79.
2. Astin, A. W., and Astin, H. S. (1993). Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of Different College Environments on the Educational Pipeline in the Sciences, Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles.
3. Barron's Educational Series, Inc. (2001). Profiles of American Colleges, Barron's Educational Series, Inc., Hauppauge, NY.
4. Betz, N. E., and Hackett, J. (1983). The relationship of self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior 23: 329-345.
5. Bowen, W. G., and Bok, D. (1998). The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Burstein, L. (1980). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research and evaluation. In: Berliner, D. C. (ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 8), American Education Research Association, Washington, DC, pp. 158-233.
7. Buunk, B. P., and Ybema, J. F. (1997). Social comparisons and occupational stress: The identification-contrast model. In: Buunk, B. P., and Gibbons, F. X. (eds.), Health, Coping, and Well-Being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 359-388.
8. Chipman, S. F., and Thomas, V. G. (1987). The participation of women and minorities in mathematical, scientific, and technical fields. Review of Research in Higher Education 14: 387-430.
9. Civian, J., and Schley, S. (1996, April). Pathways for women in the sciences II: Retention in math and science at the college level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
10. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Culotta, E., and Gibbons, A. (eds.). (1992). Minorities in science: Two generations of struggle [Special Report]. Science 258: 1176-1232.
12. Davis, J. A. (1966). The campus as a frogpond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. American Journal of Sociology 72: 17-31.
13. DeBoer, G. E. (1986). Perceived science ability as a factor in the course selections of men and women in college. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 23: 343-352.
14. Dunteman, G. H., Wisenbaker, J., and Taylor, M. E. (1979). Race and Sex Differences in College Science Program Participation (Report No. RT1-22U-1570), Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 199 034)
15. Educational Testing Service (1989). 1989 National SAT Profiles, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
16. Elliott, R., Strenta, A. C., Adair, R., Matier, M., and Scott, J. (1995). Non-Asian minority students in the science pipeline at highly selective institutions. (Final report of NSF Grant RED 93 53 821).
17. Ethington, C. A. (1997). A hierarchical linear modeling approach to studying college effects. In: Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 12), Agathon, New York, pp. 165-194.
18. Farmer, H. S., Wardrop, J. L., Anderson, M. Z., and Risinger, R. (1995). Women's career choices: Focus on science, math, and technology careers. Journal of Counseling Psychology 42: 155-170.
19. Fullilove, R. E., and Treisman, P. U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the mathematics workshop program. Journal of Negro Education 59: 463-478.
20. Green, K. C. (1989). A profile of undergraduates in the sciences. American Scientist 77: 475-480.
21. Higher Education Research Institute (1989). Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) Freshman Questionnaire, UCLA, Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles.
22. Hilton, T. L., Hsia, J., Solorzano, D. G., and Benton, N. L. (1989). Persistence in Science of High Ability Minority Students, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
23. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley, New York.
24. Jackson, L. A., Gardner, P. D., and Sullivan, L. A. (1993). Engineering persistence: Past, present, and future factors and gender differences. Higher Education 26: 227-246.
25. Jacobs, J. E., and Wigfield, A. (1989). Sex equity in mathematics and science education: Research-policy links. Educational Psychology Review 1: 39-56.
26. Jagacinski, C. M., LeBold, W. K., and Salvendy, G. (1988). Gender differences in persistence in computer-related fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4: 185-202.
27. Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In: Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M., and Hartley, E. (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology, Henry Holt, New York, pp. 410-414.
28. Lee, V. E. (1987). Identifying Potential Scientists and Engineers: An Analysis of the High School-College Transition, Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.
29. Leslie, L., and Oaxaca, R. (1998). Women and minorities in higher education. In: Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 13), Agathon, New York, pp. 304-352.
30. Leslie, L., McClure, G. T., and Oaxaca, R. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education 69: 239-276.
31. Levin, J., and Wyckoff, J. H. (1995). Predictors of persistence and success in an engineering program. NACADA Journal 15: 15-21.
32. Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
33. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C., and Hau, K. (2000). Longitudinal multilevel models of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: Counterbalancing contrast and reflected-glory effects in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 337-349.
34. McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.), Chapman and Hall, New York.
35. Meece, J. L., Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. R., and Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin 91: 324-348.
36. Nakao, K., and Treas, J. (1990). Computing 1989 Occupational Prestige Scores (General Social Survey Methodological Report no. 70), National Opinion Research Center, Chicago.
37. National Academy of Sciences (1987). Nurturing Science and Engineering Talent: A Discussion Paper, The Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, Washington, DC.
38. National Science Board (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators-2002 (NSB 02-01) [On-line], National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. Available: http://www.nsf .gov/sbe/srs/seind02/start.htm
39. National Science Foundation (1992). Blacks in Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education, National Science Foundation, Washington DC.
40. National Science Foundation (1999). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (NSF Report No. 99-338), National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
41. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., and Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 44-59.
42. Oakes, J. (1990). Lost Talent: The Underparticipation of Women, Minorities, and Disabled Persons in Science, Rand, Santa Monica, CA.
43. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
44. Post, P., Stewart, M. A., and Smith, P. L. (1991). Self-efficacy, interest, and consideration of math/science and non-math/science occupations among black freshmen. Journal of Vocational Behavior 38: 179-186.
45. Ramist, L., Lewis, C., and McCamley-Jenkins, L. (1994). Student Group Differences in Predicting College Grades: Sex, Language, and Ethnic Groups (College Board Report No. 93-1), College Entrance Examination Board, New York.
46. Raudenbush, S. W., and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Second Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
47. Schoenberger, A. K. (1988, April). College women's persistence in engineering and physical science: A further study. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
48. Schulman, J. L., and Bowen, W. G. (2001). The game of life: College sports and educational values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
50. Simpson, J. C. (2001). Segregated by subject: racial differences in the factors influencing academic major between European Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and Native Americans. Journal of Higher Education 72: 63-100.
51. Snijders, R. A. B., and Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
52. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35: 4-28.
53. Strenta, A. C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., and Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions. Research in Higher Education 35: 513-547.
54. Tobias, S. (1990). They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Research Corporation, Tucson, AZ.
55. Toutkoushian, R. K., and Smart, J. C. (2001). Do institutional characteristics affect student gains from college? Review of Higher Education 25: 39-61.
56. Turner, S. E., and Bowen, W. G. (1999). Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52: 289-313.
57. Ware, N., and Lee, V. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors. American Educational Research Journal 25: 593-614.
58. Ware, N. C., Steckler, N. A., and Leserman, J. (1985). Undergraduate women: Who chooses a science major? Journal of Higher Education 56: 73-84.