Perceptions of nursing faculty regarding ethical issues in nursing research

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 270-279

  Szirony, Tracy A ^a   Price, James H ^b   Wolfe, Elisabeth ^a   Telljohann, Susan K ^b   Dake, Joseph A ^c  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUING EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; FINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL ETHICS; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSING EDUCATION; PERCEPTION; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WRITING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NURSING RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE; AUTHORSHIP; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FACULTY, NURSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NURSING RESEARCH; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH SUPPORT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3843130865     PISSN: 00223158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20040601-03     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. American Nurses Association. (1985a). Code for nurses with interpretive statements. Kansas City, MO: Author.
2. American Nurses Association. (1985b). Human rights guidelines for nurses in clinical and other research. Kansas City, MO: Author.
3. American Nurses Association. (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Kansas City, MO: Author.
4. Decker, P.T. (1998). Scientific integrity and the journal review process. Research in Nursing & Health, 21, 283-284.
5. Blancett, S.S. (1991). The ethics of writing and publishing. Journal of Nursing Administration, 21(5), 31-36.
6. th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
7. Choi, B.K., Pak, A.W., & Purdham, J.T. (1990). Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses. Epidemiology, 1, 72-74.
8. th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
9. Denham, S.A. (1993). Stemming the tide of disreputable science: Implications for nursing. Nursing Forum, 28(2), 11-18.
10. DeRaeve, L. (1996). Nursing research: An ethical and legal appraisal. London, UK: Balliere Tindal.
11. Dodd, D.K., & Markweise, B.J. (1987). Survey response rate as a function of personalized signature on cover letter. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 97-98.
12. Everett, S.A., Price, J.H., Bedell, A., & Telljohann, S.K (1997). The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians. Evaluation of the Health Professions, 20, 207-214.
13. Fox, R.J., Crask, M.R., & Kein, J. (1988). Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467-491.
14. Groves, B.W., Price, J.H., Olsson, R.H., & King, K.A. (1997). Response rates to anonymous versus confidential surveys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 665-666.
15. rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
16. nd ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
17. Ketefian, S., & Lenz, E.R. (1995). Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research. Part II: Strategies. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11, 263-269.
18. th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
19. Mangione, T.W. (1995). Mail surveys: Improving the quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. th ed.). Stamford, CT: Appleton and Lange.
21. Oden, L., & Price, J.H. (1999). Effects of a small incentive and follow-up mailings on return rates of a survey to nurse practitioners. Psychological Reports, 85, 1154-1156.
22. th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
23. Price, J.H., Dake, J.A., & Islam, R. (2001). Selected ethical issues in research and publication: Perceptions of health education faculty. Health Education and Behaviors, 28(1), 51-64.
24. Ransdell, L.B. (1996). Maximizing response rate in questionnaire research. American Journal of Health Behavior, 20(2), 50-56.
25. Roberson, M.T., & Sundstrom, E. (1990). Questionnaire design, return rates, and response favorableness in an employee attitude questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 354-357.
26. Silva, M.C. (1995). Ethical guidelines in the conduct dissemination and implementation of nursing research. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association.
27. Wenger, N.S., Korenman, S.G., & Liu, H. (1998). Punishment for unethical behavior in the conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 73, 1187-1194.